Lock-in occurs between many different types of flow instabilities and structural-acoustic resonators. Factors that describe the coupling between the fluid and structure have been defined for low flow Mach numbers. This paper discusses how different flow instabilities influence lock-in experimentally and analytically. A key concept to the lock-in process is the relative source generation versus dissipation. The type of fluid instability source dominates the generation component of the process, so a comparison between a cavity shear layer instability with a relatively stronger source, for example wake vortex shedding from a bluff body, will be described as a coupling factor. In the fluid-elastic cavity lock-in case, the shear layer instability produced by flow over a cavity couples to the elastic structure containing the cavity. In this study, this type of lockin was not achieved experimentally. A stronger source, vortex shedding from a bluff body however, is shown experimentally to locks into the same resonator. This study shows that fluidelastic cavity lock-in is unlikely to occur given the critical level of damping that exists for a submerged structure and the relatively weak source strength that a cavity produces. Also in this paper, a unified theory is presented based on describing functions, a nonlinear control theory used to predict limit cycles of oscillation, where a self-sustaining oscillation or lock-in is possible. The describing function models capture the primary characteristics of the instability mechanisms, are consistent with Strouhal frequency concepts, capture damping, and are consistent with mass-damping concepts from wake oscillator theory. This study shows a strong consistency between the analytical models and experimental results.