The informed consent process in whole blood donation

Lindsay A. Alaishuski, Rodney D. Grim, Ronald Domen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context.-Informed consent in transfusion medicine has been an area lacking of significant research and it is unknown if donors fully comprehend the risks associated with whole blood donation. Objective.-To assess the adequacy of the informed consent process in whole blood donation. Design.-A brief questionnaire was constructed and distributed to whole blood donors visiting various fixed and mobile donor sites of the Central Pennsylvania Blood Bank. Questions consisted of demographic information; donor opinions of information content, length, and comprehension; and a short quiz pertaining to donor risks and eligibility. Results.-Analysis of 849 surveys demonstrated that donors comprehended a mean of 73.5% of the various donor eligibility and risks that were surveyed. Female and younger donors scored statistically higher on comprehension questions compared with male and older counterparts. Donors were most aware of (1) donor eligibility requirements related to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome comprehension, (2) the risk of dizziness postdonation, and (3) having lived in a certain country (93.7%-95.6% comprehension, respectively). Donors were least aware of (1) the risk of a possible referral to a physician for outstanding medical conditions or positive test results, (2) the risk of a positive test result, and (3) West Nile virus testing information (22.4%-49.3% comprehension, respectively). Conclusions.-Whole blood donors believed that they were giving informed consent, but a significant percentage of donors were unaware of several of the risks associated with blood donation, including participation in West Nile virus research testing. Our data suggest that donors do not fully comprehend the risks of whole blood donation and that repetition of information to the donor, and in multiple formats, strengthens the level of comprehension and thus the informed consent process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)947-951
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Volume132
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Blood Donors
Informed Consent
Tissue Donors
West Nile virus
Transfusion Medicine
Blood Banks
Dizziness
Research
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Referral and Consultation
Demography
Physicians

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Alaishuski, Lindsay A. ; Grim, Rodney D. ; Domen, Ronald. / The informed consent process in whole blood donation. In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 132, No. 6. pp. 947-951.
@article{74b9525ec50d4d4c8e77eb0eee734b85,
title = "The informed consent process in whole blood donation",
abstract = "Context.-Informed consent in transfusion medicine has been an area lacking of significant research and it is unknown if donors fully comprehend the risks associated with whole blood donation. Objective.-To assess the adequacy of the informed consent process in whole blood donation. Design.-A brief questionnaire was constructed and distributed to whole blood donors visiting various fixed and mobile donor sites of the Central Pennsylvania Blood Bank. Questions consisted of demographic information; donor opinions of information content, length, and comprehension; and a short quiz pertaining to donor risks and eligibility. Results.-Analysis of 849 surveys demonstrated that donors comprehended a mean of 73.5{\%} of the various donor eligibility and risks that were surveyed. Female and younger donors scored statistically higher on comprehension questions compared with male and older counterparts. Donors were most aware of (1) donor eligibility requirements related to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome comprehension, (2) the risk of dizziness postdonation, and (3) having lived in a certain country (93.7{\%}-95.6{\%} comprehension, respectively). Donors were least aware of (1) the risk of a possible referral to a physician for outstanding medical conditions or positive test results, (2) the risk of a positive test result, and (3) West Nile virus testing information (22.4{\%}-49.3{\%} comprehension, respectively). Conclusions.-Whole blood donors believed that they were giving informed consent, but a significant percentage of donors were unaware of several of the risks associated with blood donation, including participation in West Nile virus research testing. Our data suggest that donors do not fully comprehend the risks of whole blood donation and that repetition of information to the donor, and in multiple formats, strengthens the level of comprehension and thus the informed consent process.",
author = "Alaishuski, {Lindsay A.} and Grim, {Rodney D.} and Ronald Domen",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
pages = "947--951",
journal = "Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0003-9985",
publisher = "College of American Pathologists",
number = "6",

}

The informed consent process in whole blood donation. / Alaishuski, Lindsay A.; Grim, Rodney D.; Domen, Ronald.

In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 132, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 947-951.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The informed consent process in whole blood donation

AU - Alaishuski, Lindsay A.

AU - Grim, Rodney D.

AU - Domen, Ronald

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Context.-Informed consent in transfusion medicine has been an area lacking of significant research and it is unknown if donors fully comprehend the risks associated with whole blood donation. Objective.-To assess the adequacy of the informed consent process in whole blood donation. Design.-A brief questionnaire was constructed and distributed to whole blood donors visiting various fixed and mobile donor sites of the Central Pennsylvania Blood Bank. Questions consisted of demographic information; donor opinions of information content, length, and comprehension; and a short quiz pertaining to donor risks and eligibility. Results.-Analysis of 849 surveys demonstrated that donors comprehended a mean of 73.5% of the various donor eligibility and risks that were surveyed. Female and younger donors scored statistically higher on comprehension questions compared with male and older counterparts. Donors were most aware of (1) donor eligibility requirements related to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome comprehension, (2) the risk of dizziness postdonation, and (3) having lived in a certain country (93.7%-95.6% comprehension, respectively). Donors were least aware of (1) the risk of a possible referral to a physician for outstanding medical conditions or positive test results, (2) the risk of a positive test result, and (3) West Nile virus testing information (22.4%-49.3% comprehension, respectively). Conclusions.-Whole blood donors believed that they were giving informed consent, but a significant percentage of donors were unaware of several of the risks associated with blood donation, including participation in West Nile virus research testing. Our data suggest that donors do not fully comprehend the risks of whole blood donation and that repetition of information to the donor, and in multiple formats, strengthens the level of comprehension and thus the informed consent process.

AB - Context.-Informed consent in transfusion medicine has been an area lacking of significant research and it is unknown if donors fully comprehend the risks associated with whole blood donation. Objective.-To assess the adequacy of the informed consent process in whole blood donation. Design.-A brief questionnaire was constructed and distributed to whole blood donors visiting various fixed and mobile donor sites of the Central Pennsylvania Blood Bank. Questions consisted of demographic information; donor opinions of information content, length, and comprehension; and a short quiz pertaining to donor risks and eligibility. Results.-Analysis of 849 surveys demonstrated that donors comprehended a mean of 73.5% of the various donor eligibility and risks that were surveyed. Female and younger donors scored statistically higher on comprehension questions compared with male and older counterparts. Donors were most aware of (1) donor eligibility requirements related to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome comprehension, (2) the risk of dizziness postdonation, and (3) having lived in a certain country (93.7%-95.6% comprehension, respectively). Donors were least aware of (1) the risk of a possible referral to a physician for outstanding medical conditions or positive test results, (2) the risk of a positive test result, and (3) West Nile virus testing information (22.4%-49.3% comprehension, respectively). Conclusions.-Whole blood donors believed that they were giving informed consent, but a significant percentage of donors were unaware of several of the risks associated with blood donation, including participation in West Nile virus research testing. Our data suggest that donors do not fully comprehend the risks of whole blood donation and that repetition of information to the donor, and in multiple formats, strengthens the level of comprehension and thus the informed consent process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45549094208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45549094208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18517277

AN - SCOPUS:45549094208

VL - 132

SP - 947

EP - 951

JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0003-9985

IS - 6

ER -