The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: Patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence

Stephen H. Roxburgh, Katriona Shea, J. Bastow Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

319 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) has been used for several decades as an explanation for the coexistence of species in ecological communities. It is intuitively simple, but deceptively so. We show, via discussion and examples, that the IDH is not one mechanism of coexistence, but rather summarizes a set of similar phenomena that can arise from the action of several different coexistence mechanisms. These underlying mechanisms are defined by the various ways in which species differ in their response to disturbance-induced spatial and temporal variability in resources and environmental conditions. As an example, the original specification of the IDH required patchy disturbances for coexistence. However, because the underlying mechanisms of coexistence can also operate at the within-patch scale, patchy disturbances are not a necessary requirement for coexistence under intermediate-disturbance regimes. These conclusions are illustrated through the analysis of three models: a spatial within-patch model, a spatial between-patch model, and a purely temporal model. All three generate similar patterns of coexistence under intermediate disturbance, yet underlying that coexistence lie at least two quite-distinct mechanisms of species coexistence: the storage effect and relative nonlinearity. The results from our analyses suggest that, as a promoter of species coexistence, the IDH is both broader in scope and richer in detail than has previously been recognized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-371
Number of pages13
JournalEcology
Volume85
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

intermediate disturbance hypothesis
patch dynamics
coexistence
disturbance
environmental factors
nonlinearity
environmental conditions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Roxburgh, Stephen H. ; Shea, Katriona ; Wilson, J. Bastow. / The intermediate disturbance hypothesis : Patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. In: Ecology. 2004 ; Vol. 85, No. 2. pp. 359-371.
@article{7750db8c5d1940cca0ba4950cb52f199,
title = "The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: Patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence",
abstract = "The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) has been used for several decades as an explanation for the coexistence of species in ecological communities. It is intuitively simple, but deceptively so. We show, via discussion and examples, that the IDH is not one mechanism of coexistence, but rather summarizes a set of similar phenomena that can arise from the action of several different coexistence mechanisms. These underlying mechanisms are defined by the various ways in which species differ in their response to disturbance-induced spatial and temporal variability in resources and environmental conditions. As an example, the original specification of the IDH required patchy disturbances for coexistence. However, because the underlying mechanisms of coexistence can also operate at the within-patch scale, patchy disturbances are not a necessary requirement for coexistence under intermediate-disturbance regimes. These conclusions are illustrated through the analysis of three models: a spatial within-patch model, a spatial between-patch model, and a purely temporal model. All three generate similar patterns of coexistence under intermediate disturbance, yet underlying that coexistence lie at least two quite-distinct mechanisms of species coexistence: the storage effect and relative nonlinearity. The results from our analyses suggest that, as a promoter of species coexistence, the IDH is both broader in scope and richer in detail than has previously been recognized.",
author = "Roxburgh, {Stephen H.} and Katriona Shea and Wilson, {J. Bastow}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1890/03-0266",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "359--371",
journal = "Ecology",
issn = "0012-9658",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "2",

}

The intermediate disturbance hypothesis : Patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. / Roxburgh, Stephen H.; Shea, Katriona; Wilson, J. Bastow.

In: Ecology, Vol. 85, No. 2, 01.01.2004, p. 359-371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The intermediate disturbance hypothesis

T2 - Patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence

AU - Roxburgh, Stephen H.

AU - Shea, Katriona

AU - Wilson, J. Bastow

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) has been used for several decades as an explanation for the coexistence of species in ecological communities. It is intuitively simple, but deceptively so. We show, via discussion and examples, that the IDH is not one mechanism of coexistence, but rather summarizes a set of similar phenomena that can arise from the action of several different coexistence mechanisms. These underlying mechanisms are defined by the various ways in which species differ in their response to disturbance-induced spatial and temporal variability in resources and environmental conditions. As an example, the original specification of the IDH required patchy disturbances for coexistence. However, because the underlying mechanisms of coexistence can also operate at the within-patch scale, patchy disturbances are not a necessary requirement for coexistence under intermediate-disturbance regimes. These conclusions are illustrated through the analysis of three models: a spatial within-patch model, a spatial between-patch model, and a purely temporal model. All three generate similar patterns of coexistence under intermediate disturbance, yet underlying that coexistence lie at least two quite-distinct mechanisms of species coexistence: the storage effect and relative nonlinearity. The results from our analyses suggest that, as a promoter of species coexistence, the IDH is both broader in scope and richer in detail than has previously been recognized.

AB - The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) has been used for several decades as an explanation for the coexistence of species in ecological communities. It is intuitively simple, but deceptively so. We show, via discussion and examples, that the IDH is not one mechanism of coexistence, but rather summarizes a set of similar phenomena that can arise from the action of several different coexistence mechanisms. These underlying mechanisms are defined by the various ways in which species differ in their response to disturbance-induced spatial and temporal variability in resources and environmental conditions. As an example, the original specification of the IDH required patchy disturbances for coexistence. However, because the underlying mechanisms of coexistence can also operate at the within-patch scale, patchy disturbances are not a necessary requirement for coexistence under intermediate-disturbance regimes. These conclusions are illustrated through the analysis of three models: a spatial within-patch model, a spatial between-patch model, and a purely temporal model. All three generate similar patterns of coexistence under intermediate disturbance, yet underlying that coexistence lie at least two quite-distinct mechanisms of species coexistence: the storage effect and relative nonlinearity. The results from our analyses suggest that, as a promoter of species coexistence, the IDH is both broader in scope and richer in detail than has previously been recognized.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542349775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542349775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1890/03-0266

DO - 10.1890/03-0266

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1542349775

VL - 85

SP - 359

EP - 371

JO - Ecology

JF - Ecology

SN - 0012-9658

IS - 2

ER -