The issue of word division in cataloging chinese language titles

Jie Huang, Kathleen J.M. Haynes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study addresses how syllable or word division in bibliographic records of Chinese materials affects title keyword searches. Title keyword searches with both syllable division and word division are conducted in OCLC, RLIN, and Peking University Library (PKUL), and results are compared in terms of recall and precision. It is found that with both OCLC and RLIN, the recall and precision percentages vary greatly if the syllables of a keyword in the search are aggregated or not. In contrast, for PKUL, the recall and precision percentages remain high and the same in both ways. The findings suggest that PKUL has two advantages over OCLC and RLIN that would reduce human errors in word division in cataloging and searching.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-42
Number of pages16
JournalCataloging and Classification Quarterly
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

language
human error

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{d6b4422b93e64fe7830039ca92a2b715,
title = "The issue of word division in cataloging chinese language titles",
abstract = "This study addresses how syllable or word division in bibliographic records of Chinese materials affects title keyword searches. Title keyword searches with both syllable division and word division are conducted in OCLC, RLIN, and Peking University Library (PKUL), and results are compared in terms of recall and precision. It is found that with both OCLC and RLIN, the recall and precision percentages vary greatly if the syllables of a keyword in the search are aggregated or not. In contrast, for PKUL, the recall and precision percentages remain high and the same in both ways. The findings suggest that PKUL has two advantages over OCLC and RLIN that would reduce human errors in word division in cataloging and searching.",
author = "Jie Huang and Haynes, {Kathleen J.M.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1300/J104v38n01_04",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "27--42",
journal = "Cataloging and Classification Quarterly",
issn = "0163-9374",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

The issue of word division in cataloging chinese language titles. / Huang, Jie; Haynes, Kathleen J.M.

In: Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 27-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The issue of word division in cataloging chinese language titles

AU - Huang, Jie

AU - Haynes, Kathleen J.M.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - This study addresses how syllable or word division in bibliographic records of Chinese materials affects title keyword searches. Title keyword searches with both syllable division and word division are conducted in OCLC, RLIN, and Peking University Library (PKUL), and results are compared in terms of recall and precision. It is found that with both OCLC and RLIN, the recall and precision percentages vary greatly if the syllables of a keyword in the search are aggregated or not. In contrast, for PKUL, the recall and precision percentages remain high and the same in both ways. The findings suggest that PKUL has two advantages over OCLC and RLIN that would reduce human errors in word division in cataloging and searching.

AB - This study addresses how syllable or word division in bibliographic records of Chinese materials affects title keyword searches. Title keyword searches with both syllable division and word division are conducted in OCLC, RLIN, and Peking University Library (PKUL), and results are compared in terms of recall and precision. It is found that with both OCLC and RLIN, the recall and precision percentages vary greatly if the syllables of a keyword in the search are aggregated or not. In contrast, for PKUL, the recall and precision percentages remain high and the same in both ways. The findings suggest that PKUL has two advantages over OCLC and RLIN that would reduce human errors in word division in cataloging and searching.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749594005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749594005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J104v38n01_04

DO - 10.1300/J104v38n01_04

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33749594005

VL - 38

SP - 27

EP - 42

JO - Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

JF - Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

SN - 0163-9374

IS - 1

ER -