The jilting effect: Antecedents, mechanisms, and consequences for preference

Aaron M. Garvey, Margaret G. Meloy, Baba Shiv

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research explores how the experience of a jilt-the anticipation and subsequent inaccessibility of a highly desirable, aspirant option-influences preference for incumbent and non-incumbent options. The authors conceptualize jilting as a multi-stage process, which consists of a pre-jilt anticipatory phase that is initiated on the introduction of an aspirant option arid a post-jilt phase that is initiated when the aspirant option becomes inaccessible. They show that during the anticipatory phase, a process of denigration specific to the incumbent option is engendered. The subsequent jilt elicits a negative emotional response. During the affectively charged post-jilt phase, preference shifts away from the now-denigrated incumbent option, yielding a jilting effect. In four field and laboratory studies, the authors establish this jilting effect, rule out alternative accounts, and discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)785-798
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Marketing Research
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Incumbents
Anticipation
Emotional response

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{7fc1da6773e5416cb37ad660b4d57013,
title = "The jilting effect: Antecedents, mechanisms, and consequences for preference",
abstract = "This research explores how the experience of a jilt-the anticipation and subsequent inaccessibility of a highly desirable, aspirant option-influences preference for incumbent and non-incumbent options. The authors conceptualize jilting as a multi-stage process, which consists of a pre-jilt anticipatory phase that is initiated on the introduction of an aspirant option arid a post-jilt phase that is initiated when the aspirant option becomes inaccessible. They show that during the anticipatory phase, a process of denigration specific to the incumbent option is engendered. The subsequent jilt elicits a negative emotional response. During the affectively charged post-jilt phase, preference shifts away from the now-denigrated incumbent option, yielding a jilting effect. In four field and laboratory studies, the authors establish this jilting effect, rule out alternative accounts, and discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings.",
author = "Garvey, {Aaron M.} and Meloy, {Margaret G.} and Baba Shiv",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1509/jmr.14.0373",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "785--798",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Research",
issn = "0022-2437",
publisher = "American Marketing Association",
number = "5",

}

The jilting effect : Antecedents, mechanisms, and consequences for preference. / Garvey, Aaron M.; Meloy, Margaret G.; Shiv, Baba.

In: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 54, No. 5, 10.2017, p. 785-798.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The jilting effect

T2 - Antecedents, mechanisms, and consequences for preference

AU - Garvey, Aaron M.

AU - Meloy, Margaret G.

AU - Shiv, Baba

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - This research explores how the experience of a jilt-the anticipation and subsequent inaccessibility of a highly desirable, aspirant option-influences preference for incumbent and non-incumbent options. The authors conceptualize jilting as a multi-stage process, which consists of a pre-jilt anticipatory phase that is initiated on the introduction of an aspirant option arid a post-jilt phase that is initiated when the aspirant option becomes inaccessible. They show that during the anticipatory phase, a process of denigration specific to the incumbent option is engendered. The subsequent jilt elicits a negative emotional response. During the affectively charged post-jilt phase, preference shifts away from the now-denigrated incumbent option, yielding a jilting effect. In four field and laboratory studies, the authors establish this jilting effect, rule out alternative accounts, and discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings.

AB - This research explores how the experience of a jilt-the anticipation and subsequent inaccessibility of a highly desirable, aspirant option-influences preference for incumbent and non-incumbent options. The authors conceptualize jilting as a multi-stage process, which consists of a pre-jilt anticipatory phase that is initiated on the introduction of an aspirant option arid a post-jilt phase that is initiated when the aspirant option becomes inaccessible. They show that during the anticipatory phase, a process of denigration specific to the incumbent option is engendered. The subsequent jilt elicits a negative emotional response. During the affectively charged post-jilt phase, preference shifts away from the now-denigrated incumbent option, yielding a jilting effect. In four field and laboratory studies, the authors establish this jilting effect, rule out alternative accounts, and discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034055494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034055494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1509/jmr.14.0373

DO - 10.1509/jmr.14.0373

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85034055494

VL - 54

SP - 785

EP - 798

JO - Journal of Marketing Research

JF - Journal of Marketing Research

SN - 0022-2437

IS - 5

ER -