The lead-time reliability paradox and inconsistent value-of-reliability estimates

John Eugene Tyworth, John Saldanha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The value-of-reliability (VOR) reflects the savings in inventory-system costs from more reliable (less variable) lead times. Previous studies have revealed that more reliable, but positively skewed, lead times could actually increase optimal safety inventory when the probability of satisfying all demand during a replenishment cycle drops below 70%. Researchers claim that this paradox affects most firms and that it explains the inconsistent VOR estimates found in the transportation economics literature. Our investigation reveals that firms interested in high product availability may safely ignore the paradox and that less lead-time variability consistently increases VOR, the paradox notwithstanding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)76-85
Number of pages10
JournalTransportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
Volume70
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Lead
firm
Values
savings
Availability
Economics
demand
costs
economics
time
Paradox
Lead time
Costs
literature
Inventory systems
Replenishment
Transportation economics
Safety
Product availability
Savings

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Transportation

Cite this

@article{4746ea41e0a8450a8124aa9c76c6450f,
title = "The lead-time reliability paradox and inconsistent value-of-reliability estimates",
abstract = "The value-of-reliability (VOR) reflects the savings in inventory-system costs from more reliable (less variable) lead times. Previous studies have revealed that more reliable, but positively skewed, lead times could actually increase optimal safety inventory when the probability of satisfying all demand during a replenishment cycle drops below 70{\%}. Researchers claim that this paradox affects most firms and that it explains the inconsistent VOR estimates found in the transportation economics literature. Our investigation reveals that firms interested in high product availability may safely ignore the paradox and that less lead-time variability consistently increases VOR, the paradox notwithstanding.",
author = "Tyworth, {John Eugene} and John Saldanha",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tre.2014.06.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "76--85",
journal = "Transportation Research, Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review",
issn = "1366-5545",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

The lead-time reliability paradox and inconsistent value-of-reliability estimates. / Tyworth, John Eugene; Saldanha, John.

In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 70, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 76-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The lead-time reliability paradox and inconsistent value-of-reliability estimates

AU - Tyworth, John Eugene

AU - Saldanha, John

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The value-of-reliability (VOR) reflects the savings in inventory-system costs from more reliable (less variable) lead times. Previous studies have revealed that more reliable, but positively skewed, lead times could actually increase optimal safety inventory when the probability of satisfying all demand during a replenishment cycle drops below 70%. Researchers claim that this paradox affects most firms and that it explains the inconsistent VOR estimates found in the transportation economics literature. Our investigation reveals that firms interested in high product availability may safely ignore the paradox and that less lead-time variability consistently increases VOR, the paradox notwithstanding.

AB - The value-of-reliability (VOR) reflects the savings in inventory-system costs from more reliable (less variable) lead times. Previous studies have revealed that more reliable, but positively skewed, lead times could actually increase optimal safety inventory when the probability of satisfying all demand during a replenishment cycle drops below 70%. Researchers claim that this paradox affects most firms and that it explains the inconsistent VOR estimates found in the transportation economics literature. Our investigation reveals that firms interested in high product availability may safely ignore the paradox and that less lead-time variability consistently increases VOR, the paradox notwithstanding.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904562249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904562249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tre.2014.06.009

DO - 10.1016/j.tre.2014.06.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904562249

VL - 70

SP - 76

EP - 85

JO - Transportation Research, Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

JF - Transportation Research, Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

SN - 1366-5545

IS - 1

ER -