The logic of causal investigations and the rhetoric and pragmatics of research planning

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Must investigations of treatment effects adopt a logic of causal investigation that defaults to the design and application of randomized control trials in education? Does the language of scientific research impel this too for intervention studies? In this brief response to Scriven's chapter, we explore the pragmatics of research planning to identify compounding factors and challenges to such characterizations of 'gold standard' research in education. The prospect is tantalizing: if adjudications of explanatory power are the true benchmark for evaluating educational studies, then a requisite variety in research designs and logics must be entertained, and engaged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationA Companion to Research in Education
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
Pages173-175
Number of pages3
Volume9789400768093
ISBN (Electronic)9789400768093
ISBN (Print)9400768087, 9789400768086
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

research planning
rhetoric
pragmatics
gold standard
education
language

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Mark, M. M. (2014). The logic of causal investigations and the rhetoric and pragmatics of research planning. In A Companion to Research in Education (Vol. 9789400768093, pp. 173-175). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_22
Mark, Melvin Michael. / The logic of causal investigations and the rhetoric and pragmatics of research planning. A Companion to Research in Education. Vol. 9789400768093 Springer Netherlands, 2014. pp. 173-175
@inbook{46f2063c9d60467d836e70766bb90a9b,
title = "The logic of causal investigations and the rhetoric and pragmatics of research planning",
abstract = "Must investigations of treatment effects adopt a logic of causal investigation that defaults to the design and application of randomized control trials in education? Does the language of scientific research impel this too for intervention studies? In this brief response to Scriven's chapter, we explore the pragmatics of research planning to identify compounding factors and challenges to such characterizations of 'gold standard' research in education. The prospect is tantalizing: if adjudications of explanatory power are the true benchmark for evaluating educational studies, then a requisite variety in research designs and logics must be entertained, and engaged.",
author = "Mark, {Melvin Michael}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_22",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9400768087",
volume = "9789400768093",
pages = "173--175",
booktitle = "A Companion to Research in Education",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Mark, MM 2014, The logic of causal investigations and the rhetoric and pragmatics of research planning. in A Companion to Research in Education. vol. 9789400768093, Springer Netherlands, pp. 173-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_22

The logic of causal investigations and the rhetoric and pragmatics of research planning. / Mark, Melvin Michael.

A Companion to Research in Education. Vol. 9789400768093 Springer Netherlands, 2014. p. 173-175.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The logic of causal investigations and the rhetoric and pragmatics of research planning

AU - Mark, Melvin Michael

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Must investigations of treatment effects adopt a logic of causal investigation that defaults to the design and application of randomized control trials in education? Does the language of scientific research impel this too for intervention studies? In this brief response to Scriven's chapter, we explore the pragmatics of research planning to identify compounding factors and challenges to such characterizations of 'gold standard' research in education. The prospect is tantalizing: if adjudications of explanatory power are the true benchmark for evaluating educational studies, then a requisite variety in research designs and logics must be entertained, and engaged.

AB - Must investigations of treatment effects adopt a logic of causal investigation that defaults to the design and application of randomized control trials in education? Does the language of scientific research impel this too for intervention studies? In this brief response to Scriven's chapter, we explore the pragmatics of research planning to identify compounding factors and challenges to such characterizations of 'gold standard' research in education. The prospect is tantalizing: if adjudications of explanatory power are the true benchmark for evaluating educational studies, then a requisite variety in research designs and logics must be entertained, and engaged.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928862016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928862016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_22

DO - 10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_22

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9400768087

SN - 9789400768086

VL - 9789400768093

SP - 173

EP - 175

BT - A Companion to Research in Education

PB - Springer Netherlands

ER -

Mark MM. The logic of causal investigations and the rhetoric and pragmatics of research planning. In A Companion to Research in Education. Vol. 9789400768093. Springer Netherlands. 2014. p. 173-175 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_22