The MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study revisited: Two views ten years after its initial publication

E. Fuller Torrey, Jonathan Stanley, John Monahan, John S. Shannon, Henry J. Steadman, Paul S. Appelbaum, Thomas Grisso, Edward P. Mulvey, Pamela Clark Robbins, Loren H. Roth, Eric Silver

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents two views of the results of the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study, which was conducted between 1992 and 1995 in order to ascertain the prevalence of community violence in a sample of people discharged from acute psychiatric facilities. The initial findings, which were published in 1998 in the Archives of General Psychiatry, have been cited by some advocates as proof that discharged psychiatric patients are not more dangerous than other persons in the general population. For the article presented here, Dr. Torrey and Mr. Stanley examined additional articles, book chapters, and a book about the MacArthur Study that have appeared since 1998 in order to ascertain whether the study's original conclusion should be modified and whether additional conclusions can be drawn from the subsequently published data. They present six points on which they disagree with the findings or fault the design of the MacArthur Study. After each point, Dr. Monahan, Dr. Steadman, and other authors of the MacArthur Study Group respond.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-152
Number of pages6
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Violence
Psychiatry
Publications
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Torrey, E. Fuller ; Stanley, Jonathan ; Monahan, John ; Shannon, John S. ; Steadman, Henry J. ; Appelbaum, Paul S. ; Grisso, Thomas ; Mulvey, Edward P. ; Robbins, Pamela Clark ; Roth, Loren H. ; Silver, Eric. / The MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study revisited : Two views ten years after its initial publication. In: Psychiatric Services. 2008 ; Vol. 59, No. 2. pp. 147-152.
@article{60ec510492ea45ed8cb25ca5eb70d54e,
title = "The MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study revisited: Two views ten years after its initial publication",
abstract = "This article presents two views of the results of the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study, which was conducted between 1992 and 1995 in order to ascertain the prevalence of community violence in a sample of people discharged from acute psychiatric facilities. The initial findings, which were published in 1998 in the Archives of General Psychiatry, have been cited by some advocates as proof that discharged psychiatric patients are not more dangerous than other persons in the general population. For the article presented here, Dr. Torrey and Mr. Stanley examined additional articles, book chapters, and a book about the MacArthur Study that have appeared since 1998 in order to ascertain whether the study's original conclusion should be modified and whether additional conclusions can be drawn from the subsequently published data. They present six points on which they disagree with the findings or fault the design of the MacArthur Study. After each point, Dr. Monahan, Dr. Steadman, and other authors of the MacArthur Study Group respond.",
author = "Torrey, {E. Fuller} and Jonathan Stanley and John Monahan and Shannon, {John S.} and Steadman, {Henry J.} and Appelbaum, {Paul S.} and Thomas Grisso and Mulvey, {Edward P.} and Robbins, {Pamela Clark} and Roth, {Loren H.} and Eric Silver",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1176/ps.2008.59.2.147",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "147--152",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "2",

}

Torrey, EF, Stanley, J, Monahan, J, Shannon, JS, Steadman, HJ, Appelbaum, PS, Grisso, T, Mulvey, EP, Robbins, PC, Roth, LH & Silver, E 2008, 'The MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study revisited: Two views ten years after its initial publication', Psychiatric Services, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2008.59.2.147

The MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study revisited : Two views ten years after its initial publication. / Torrey, E. Fuller; Stanley, Jonathan; Monahan, John; Shannon, John S.; Steadman, Henry J.; Appelbaum, Paul S.; Grisso, Thomas; Mulvey, Edward P.; Robbins, Pamela Clark; Roth, Loren H.; Silver, Eric.

In: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 59, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 147-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study revisited

T2 - Two views ten years after its initial publication

AU - Torrey, E. Fuller

AU - Stanley, Jonathan

AU - Monahan, John

AU - Shannon, John S.

AU - Steadman, Henry J.

AU - Appelbaum, Paul S.

AU - Grisso, Thomas

AU - Mulvey, Edward P.

AU - Robbins, Pamela Clark

AU - Roth, Loren H.

AU - Silver, Eric

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - This article presents two views of the results of the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study, which was conducted between 1992 and 1995 in order to ascertain the prevalence of community violence in a sample of people discharged from acute psychiatric facilities. The initial findings, which were published in 1998 in the Archives of General Psychiatry, have been cited by some advocates as proof that discharged psychiatric patients are not more dangerous than other persons in the general population. For the article presented here, Dr. Torrey and Mr. Stanley examined additional articles, book chapters, and a book about the MacArthur Study that have appeared since 1998 in order to ascertain whether the study's original conclusion should be modified and whether additional conclusions can be drawn from the subsequently published data. They present six points on which they disagree with the findings or fault the design of the MacArthur Study. After each point, Dr. Monahan, Dr. Steadman, and other authors of the MacArthur Study Group respond.

AB - This article presents two views of the results of the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study, which was conducted between 1992 and 1995 in order to ascertain the prevalence of community violence in a sample of people discharged from acute psychiatric facilities. The initial findings, which were published in 1998 in the Archives of General Psychiatry, have been cited by some advocates as proof that discharged psychiatric patients are not more dangerous than other persons in the general population. For the article presented here, Dr. Torrey and Mr. Stanley examined additional articles, book chapters, and a book about the MacArthur Study that have appeared since 1998 in order to ascertain whether the study's original conclusion should be modified and whether additional conclusions can be drawn from the subsequently published data. They present six points on which they disagree with the findings or fault the design of the MacArthur Study. After each point, Dr. Monahan, Dr. Steadman, and other authors of the MacArthur Study Group respond.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047685587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047685587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/ps.2008.59.2.147

DO - 10.1176/ps.2008.59.2.147

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18245156

AN - SCOPUS:85047685587

VL - 59

SP - 147

EP - 152

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 2

ER -