The Many Meanings of Religiousness: A Policy‐Capturing Approach

Kenneth I. Pargament, Mark S. Sullivan, William K. Balzer, Kimberly S. Van Haitsma, Patrick H. Raymark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article reports the results of two policy‐capturing studies that investigated individual differences in the meaning of religiousness. Policy capturing requires judges to respond to a large number of hypothetical scenarios or profiles that differ along a number of potentially relevant cues or attributes. Multiple regression analyses are then conducted to ascertain which cues are influencing each judge's responses. For both studies, 100 profiles were developed describing hypothetical individuals who differed on 10 cues thought to influence perceptions of religiousness (e.g., church attendance, doctrinal orthodoxy), and judges rated each profile on a 9‐point religiousness scale. Judges in Study 1 were 27 Roman Catholic and Protestant college students. Policy‐capturing analyses identified clear individual differences in the cues that afifected judgments of religiousness, and in the self‐insight of the students into their personal policies. To test whether these findings reflected the youth or religious maturity of the sample, the study was replicated with a sample of 22 Catholic and Protestant clergy. Similar results were found in Study 2. In both samples, individual policy capturing did a significantly better job of predicting judgments of religiousness than did self‐described policies or policies created by averaging across judges. Together these findings underscore the diversity of religious meanings and the need for further idiographic investigations in the psychology of religion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)953-983
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume63
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Cues
Individuality
Religion and Psychology
Clergy
Students
Regression Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Pargament, Kenneth I. ; Sullivan, Mark S. ; Balzer, William K. ; Van Haitsma, Kimberly S. ; Raymark, Patrick H. / The Many Meanings of Religiousness : A Policy‐Capturing Approach. In: Journal of Personality. 1995 ; Vol. 63, No. 4. pp. 953-983.
@article{45b5429724224dfa8ffd8b38674dbf87,
title = "The Many Meanings of Religiousness: A Policy‐Capturing Approach",
abstract = "ABSTRACT This article reports the results of two policy‐capturing studies that investigated individual differences in the meaning of religiousness. Policy capturing requires judges to respond to a large number of hypothetical scenarios or profiles that differ along a number of potentially relevant cues or attributes. Multiple regression analyses are then conducted to ascertain which cues are influencing each judge's responses. For both studies, 100 profiles were developed describing hypothetical individuals who differed on 10 cues thought to influence perceptions of religiousness (e.g., church attendance, doctrinal orthodoxy), and judges rated each profile on a 9‐point religiousness scale. Judges in Study 1 were 27 Roman Catholic and Protestant college students. Policy‐capturing analyses identified clear individual differences in the cues that afifected judgments of religiousness, and in the self‐insight of the students into their personal policies. To test whether these findings reflected the youth or religious maturity of the sample, the study was replicated with a sample of 22 Catholic and Protestant clergy. Similar results were found in Study 2. In both samples, individual policy capturing did a significantly better job of predicting judgments of religiousness than did self‐described policies or policies created by averaging across judges. Together these findings underscore the diversity of religious meanings and the need for further idiographic investigations in the psychology of religion.",
author = "Pargament, {Kenneth I.} and Sullivan, {Mark S.} and Balzer, {William K.} and {Van Haitsma}, {Kimberly S.} and Raymark, {Patrick H.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00322.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "953--983",
journal = "Journal of Personality",
issn = "0022-3506",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

The Many Meanings of Religiousness : A Policy‐Capturing Approach. / Pargament, Kenneth I.; Sullivan, Mark S.; Balzer, William K.; Van Haitsma, Kimberly S.; Raymark, Patrick H.

In: Journal of Personality, Vol. 63, No. 4, 01.01.1995, p. 953-983.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Many Meanings of Religiousness

T2 - A Policy‐Capturing Approach

AU - Pargament, Kenneth I.

AU - Sullivan, Mark S.

AU - Balzer, William K.

AU - Van Haitsma, Kimberly S.

AU - Raymark, Patrick H.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - ABSTRACT This article reports the results of two policy‐capturing studies that investigated individual differences in the meaning of religiousness. Policy capturing requires judges to respond to a large number of hypothetical scenarios or profiles that differ along a number of potentially relevant cues or attributes. Multiple regression analyses are then conducted to ascertain which cues are influencing each judge's responses. For both studies, 100 profiles were developed describing hypothetical individuals who differed on 10 cues thought to influence perceptions of religiousness (e.g., church attendance, doctrinal orthodoxy), and judges rated each profile on a 9‐point religiousness scale. Judges in Study 1 were 27 Roman Catholic and Protestant college students. Policy‐capturing analyses identified clear individual differences in the cues that afifected judgments of religiousness, and in the self‐insight of the students into their personal policies. To test whether these findings reflected the youth or religious maturity of the sample, the study was replicated with a sample of 22 Catholic and Protestant clergy. Similar results were found in Study 2. In both samples, individual policy capturing did a significantly better job of predicting judgments of religiousness than did self‐described policies or policies created by averaging across judges. Together these findings underscore the diversity of religious meanings and the need for further idiographic investigations in the psychology of religion.

AB - ABSTRACT This article reports the results of two policy‐capturing studies that investigated individual differences in the meaning of religiousness. Policy capturing requires judges to respond to a large number of hypothetical scenarios or profiles that differ along a number of potentially relevant cues or attributes. Multiple regression analyses are then conducted to ascertain which cues are influencing each judge's responses. For both studies, 100 profiles were developed describing hypothetical individuals who differed on 10 cues thought to influence perceptions of religiousness (e.g., church attendance, doctrinal orthodoxy), and judges rated each profile on a 9‐point religiousness scale. Judges in Study 1 were 27 Roman Catholic and Protestant college students. Policy‐capturing analyses identified clear individual differences in the cues that afifected judgments of religiousness, and in the self‐insight of the students into their personal policies. To test whether these findings reflected the youth or religious maturity of the sample, the study was replicated with a sample of 22 Catholic and Protestant clergy. Similar results were found in Study 2. In both samples, individual policy capturing did a significantly better job of predicting judgments of religiousness than did self‐described policies or policies created by averaging across judges. Together these findings underscore the diversity of religious meanings and the need for further idiographic investigations in the psychology of religion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989660598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989660598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00322.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00322.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84989660598

VL - 63

SP - 953

EP - 983

JO - Journal of Personality

JF - Journal of Personality

SN - 0022-3506

IS - 4

ER -