The match and mismatch between photosynthesis and land surface phenology of deciduous forests

Petra D'Odorico, Alemu Gonsamo, Christopher M. Gough, Gil Bohrer, James Morison, Matthew Wilkinson, Paul J. Hanson, Damiano Gianelle, Jose Fuentes, Nina Buchmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Plant phenology is a key indicator of the terrestrial biosphere's response to climate change, as well as a driver of global climate through changes in the carbon, energy and water cycles. Remote sensing observations of seasonal canopy greenness dynamics represent a valuable means to study land surface phenology (LSP) at scales relevant for comparison with regional climate information as well as ecosystem-level CO2 fluxes. We explore relationships among key LSP dates at the start and end of the season captured by three remote sensing products (i.e., NDVI: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; PI: Phenology Index; MODIS Land Cover Dynamics Product based on the Enhanced Vegetation Index, EVI) over 19 deciduous broadleaf and mixed forest sites in the northern hemisphere for 2000-2012, and compare these estimates to estimates of start and end of photosynthesis phenology extracted from gross primary productivity (GPP) from CO2 flux measurements. To derive phenological transition dates, we use analytical solutions of various derivatives from the fitted logistic curves. LSP dates estimated by the three remote sensing products were not equivalent and differed in their sign and magnitude of lags with photosynthesis phenology dates. NDVI-derived phenology was characterized by shorter growing seasons, while EVI prolonged it by about two weeks compared to the photosynthesis phenology season length. PI start and end of season dates more closely matched the start (r2=0.84, RMSE=7.61) and end (r2=0.61, RMSE=8.57) of photosynthesis phenology as estimated by GPP time series. PI was also found agreeing best with LSP estimates from highly spatially resolved ground digital camera observations, available for about half of the investigated FLUXNET sites. Although there were strong relationships between remotely sensed LSP and photosynthesis phenology, the relationships were not consistent across deciduous forest ecosystems implying that the vegetative and photosynthetic timing do not always follow each other in the same direction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-38
Number of pages14
JournalAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
Volume214-215
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 5 2015

Fingerprint

deciduous forests
deciduous forest
phenology
land surface
photosynthesis
NDVI
remote sensing
primary productivity
climate change
productivity
hydrologic cycle
moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer
flux measurement
vegetation index
mixed forests
mixed forest
land cover
cameras
regional climate
forest ecosystems

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Forestry
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

D'Odorico, P., Gonsamo, A., Gough, C. M., Bohrer, G., Morison, J., Wilkinson, M., ... Buchmann, N. (2015). The match and mismatch between photosynthesis and land surface phenology of deciduous forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 214-215, 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.07.005
D'Odorico, Petra ; Gonsamo, Alemu ; Gough, Christopher M. ; Bohrer, Gil ; Morison, James ; Wilkinson, Matthew ; Hanson, Paul J. ; Gianelle, Damiano ; Fuentes, Jose ; Buchmann, Nina. / The match and mismatch between photosynthesis and land surface phenology of deciduous forests. In: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2015 ; Vol. 214-215. pp. 25-38.
@article{5aeb86d5e4e145089efae9c405090733,
title = "The match and mismatch between photosynthesis and land surface phenology of deciduous forests",
abstract = "Plant phenology is a key indicator of the terrestrial biosphere's response to climate change, as well as a driver of global climate through changes in the carbon, energy and water cycles. Remote sensing observations of seasonal canopy greenness dynamics represent a valuable means to study land surface phenology (LSP) at scales relevant for comparison with regional climate information as well as ecosystem-level CO2 fluxes. We explore relationships among key LSP dates at the start and end of the season captured by three remote sensing products (i.e., NDVI: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; PI: Phenology Index; MODIS Land Cover Dynamics Product based on the Enhanced Vegetation Index, EVI) over 19 deciduous broadleaf and mixed forest sites in the northern hemisphere for 2000-2012, and compare these estimates to estimates of start and end of photosynthesis phenology extracted from gross primary productivity (GPP) from CO2 flux measurements. To derive phenological transition dates, we use analytical solutions of various derivatives from the fitted logistic curves. LSP dates estimated by the three remote sensing products were not equivalent and differed in their sign and magnitude of lags with photosynthesis phenology dates. NDVI-derived phenology was characterized by shorter growing seasons, while EVI prolonged it by about two weeks compared to the photosynthesis phenology season length. PI start and end of season dates more closely matched the start (r2=0.84, RMSE=7.61) and end (r2=0.61, RMSE=8.57) of photosynthesis phenology as estimated by GPP time series. PI was also found agreeing best with LSP estimates from highly spatially resolved ground digital camera observations, available for about half of the investigated FLUXNET sites. Although there were strong relationships between remotely sensed LSP and photosynthesis phenology, the relationships were not consistent across deciduous forest ecosystems implying that the vegetative and photosynthetic timing do not always follow each other in the same direction.",
author = "Petra D'Odorico and Alemu Gonsamo and Gough, {Christopher M.} and Gil Bohrer and James Morison and Matthew Wilkinson and Hanson, {Paul J.} and Damiano Gianelle and Jose Fuentes and Nina Buchmann",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "214-215",
pages = "25--38",
journal = "Agricultural and Forest Meteorology",
issn = "0168-1923",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

D'Odorico, P, Gonsamo, A, Gough, CM, Bohrer, G, Morison, J, Wilkinson, M, Hanson, PJ, Gianelle, D, Fuentes, J & Buchmann, N 2015, 'The match and mismatch between photosynthesis and land surface phenology of deciduous forests', Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 214-215, pp. 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.07.005

The match and mismatch between photosynthesis and land surface phenology of deciduous forests. / D'Odorico, Petra; Gonsamo, Alemu; Gough, Christopher M.; Bohrer, Gil; Morison, James; Wilkinson, Matthew; Hanson, Paul J.; Gianelle, Damiano; Fuentes, Jose; Buchmann, Nina.

In: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 214-215, 05.12.2015, p. 25-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The match and mismatch between photosynthesis and land surface phenology of deciduous forests

AU - D'Odorico, Petra

AU - Gonsamo, Alemu

AU - Gough, Christopher M.

AU - Bohrer, Gil

AU - Morison, James

AU - Wilkinson, Matthew

AU - Hanson, Paul J.

AU - Gianelle, Damiano

AU - Fuentes, Jose

AU - Buchmann, Nina

PY - 2015/12/5

Y1 - 2015/12/5

N2 - Plant phenology is a key indicator of the terrestrial biosphere's response to climate change, as well as a driver of global climate through changes in the carbon, energy and water cycles. Remote sensing observations of seasonal canopy greenness dynamics represent a valuable means to study land surface phenology (LSP) at scales relevant for comparison with regional climate information as well as ecosystem-level CO2 fluxes. We explore relationships among key LSP dates at the start and end of the season captured by three remote sensing products (i.e., NDVI: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; PI: Phenology Index; MODIS Land Cover Dynamics Product based on the Enhanced Vegetation Index, EVI) over 19 deciduous broadleaf and mixed forest sites in the northern hemisphere for 2000-2012, and compare these estimates to estimates of start and end of photosynthesis phenology extracted from gross primary productivity (GPP) from CO2 flux measurements. To derive phenological transition dates, we use analytical solutions of various derivatives from the fitted logistic curves. LSP dates estimated by the three remote sensing products were not equivalent and differed in their sign and magnitude of lags with photosynthesis phenology dates. NDVI-derived phenology was characterized by shorter growing seasons, while EVI prolonged it by about two weeks compared to the photosynthesis phenology season length. PI start and end of season dates more closely matched the start (r2=0.84, RMSE=7.61) and end (r2=0.61, RMSE=8.57) of photosynthesis phenology as estimated by GPP time series. PI was also found agreeing best with LSP estimates from highly spatially resolved ground digital camera observations, available for about half of the investigated FLUXNET sites. Although there were strong relationships between remotely sensed LSP and photosynthesis phenology, the relationships were not consistent across deciduous forest ecosystems implying that the vegetative and photosynthetic timing do not always follow each other in the same direction.

AB - Plant phenology is a key indicator of the terrestrial biosphere's response to climate change, as well as a driver of global climate through changes in the carbon, energy and water cycles. Remote sensing observations of seasonal canopy greenness dynamics represent a valuable means to study land surface phenology (LSP) at scales relevant for comparison with regional climate information as well as ecosystem-level CO2 fluxes. We explore relationships among key LSP dates at the start and end of the season captured by three remote sensing products (i.e., NDVI: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; PI: Phenology Index; MODIS Land Cover Dynamics Product based on the Enhanced Vegetation Index, EVI) over 19 deciduous broadleaf and mixed forest sites in the northern hemisphere for 2000-2012, and compare these estimates to estimates of start and end of photosynthesis phenology extracted from gross primary productivity (GPP) from CO2 flux measurements. To derive phenological transition dates, we use analytical solutions of various derivatives from the fitted logistic curves. LSP dates estimated by the three remote sensing products were not equivalent and differed in their sign and magnitude of lags with photosynthesis phenology dates. NDVI-derived phenology was characterized by shorter growing seasons, while EVI prolonged it by about two weeks compared to the photosynthesis phenology season length. PI start and end of season dates more closely matched the start (r2=0.84, RMSE=7.61) and end (r2=0.61, RMSE=8.57) of photosynthesis phenology as estimated by GPP time series. PI was also found agreeing best with LSP estimates from highly spatially resolved ground digital camera observations, available for about half of the investigated FLUXNET sites. Although there were strong relationships between remotely sensed LSP and photosynthesis phenology, the relationships were not consistent across deciduous forest ecosystems implying that the vegetative and photosynthetic timing do not always follow each other in the same direction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939170337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939170337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.07.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939170337

VL - 214-215

SP - 25

EP - 38

JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

SN - 0168-1923

ER -