The meaning of autonomy: On and beyond the interpersonal circumplex

Beverly A. Hmel, Aaron Lee Pincus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Review of existing psychological literature suggests that conceptions of autonomy as an individual difference have taken several forms. Structural analyses of 15 self-report autonomy scales utilizing the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) and the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality as structural referents confirmed the presence of diverse conceptualizations of this construct. Two hundred ninety undergraduate students completed 15 autonomy scales, the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R), and the Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS). Factor analysis revealed three unique conceptualizations of autonomy. Each factor was further differentiated from the others by its unique location on the IPC and its distinct relationships with the domains and facets of the NEO-PI-R. Evaluation of these findings within the context of existing autonomy research leads to the conclusion that only two of the three identified factors reflect autonomy. Factor I, Depressogenic Vulnerability, though relatively consistent with its theoretical foundation, lacks the agentic quality one would expect in an autonomy construct. Factors II and III, presently labeled Self-governance and Agentic Separation, respectively, share an agentic core but differ considerably in their interpersonal content. Theoretical and empirical implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume70
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Personality Inventory
Individuality
Self Report
Statistical Factor Analysis
Personality
Students
Psychology
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{2b4bb53fe4564d71bb9dd432d7e689e8,
title = "The meaning of autonomy: On and beyond the interpersonal circumplex",
abstract = "Review of existing psychological literature suggests that conceptions of autonomy as an individual difference have taken several forms. Structural analyses of 15 self-report autonomy scales utilizing the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) and the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality as structural referents confirmed the presence of diverse conceptualizations of this construct. Two hundred ninety undergraduate students completed 15 autonomy scales, the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R), and the Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS). Factor analysis revealed three unique conceptualizations of autonomy. Each factor was further differentiated from the others by its unique location on the IPC and its distinct relationships with the domains and facets of the NEO-PI-R. Evaluation of these findings within the context of existing autonomy research leads to the conclusion that only two of the three identified factors reflect autonomy. Factor I, Depressogenic Vulnerability, though relatively consistent with its theoretical foundation, lacks the agentic quality one would expect in an autonomy construct. Factors II and III, presently labeled Self-governance and Agentic Separation, respectively, share an agentic core but differ considerably in their interpersonal content. Theoretical and empirical implications of these findings are discussed.",
author = "Hmel, {Beverly A.} and Pincus, {Aaron Lee}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-6494.05006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
journal = "Journal of Personality",
issn = "0022-3506",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

The meaning of autonomy : On and beyond the interpersonal circumplex. / Hmel, Beverly A.; Pincus, Aaron Lee.

In: Journal of Personality, Vol. 70, No. 3, 01.01.2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The meaning of autonomy

T2 - On and beyond the interpersonal circumplex

AU - Hmel, Beverly A.

AU - Pincus, Aaron Lee

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Review of existing psychological literature suggests that conceptions of autonomy as an individual difference have taken several forms. Structural analyses of 15 self-report autonomy scales utilizing the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) and the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality as structural referents confirmed the presence of diverse conceptualizations of this construct. Two hundred ninety undergraduate students completed 15 autonomy scales, the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R), and the Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS). Factor analysis revealed three unique conceptualizations of autonomy. Each factor was further differentiated from the others by its unique location on the IPC and its distinct relationships with the domains and facets of the NEO-PI-R. Evaluation of these findings within the context of existing autonomy research leads to the conclusion that only two of the three identified factors reflect autonomy. Factor I, Depressogenic Vulnerability, though relatively consistent with its theoretical foundation, lacks the agentic quality one would expect in an autonomy construct. Factors II and III, presently labeled Self-governance and Agentic Separation, respectively, share an agentic core but differ considerably in their interpersonal content. Theoretical and empirical implications of these findings are discussed.

AB - Review of existing psychological literature suggests that conceptions of autonomy as an individual difference have taken several forms. Structural analyses of 15 self-report autonomy scales utilizing the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) and the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality as structural referents confirmed the presence of diverse conceptualizations of this construct. Two hundred ninety undergraduate students completed 15 autonomy scales, the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R), and the Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS). Factor analysis revealed three unique conceptualizations of autonomy. Each factor was further differentiated from the others by its unique location on the IPC and its distinct relationships with the domains and facets of the NEO-PI-R. Evaluation of these findings within the context of existing autonomy research leads to the conclusion that only two of the three identified factors reflect autonomy. Factor I, Depressogenic Vulnerability, though relatively consistent with its theoretical foundation, lacks the agentic quality one would expect in an autonomy construct. Factors II and III, presently labeled Self-governance and Agentic Separation, respectively, share an agentic core but differ considerably in their interpersonal content. Theoretical and empirical implications of these findings are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038892068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038892068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-6494.05006

DO - 10.1111/1467-6494.05006

M3 - Article

C2 - 12049162

AN - SCOPUS:0038892068

VL - 70

JO - Journal of Personality

JF - Journal of Personality

SN - 0022-3506

IS - 3

ER -