The measurement of values in surveys

A comparison of ratings and rankings

Duane Francis Alwin, Jon A. Krosnick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

195 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social values are most commonly measured using ranking techniques, but there is a scarcity of systematic comparisons between rankings and other approaches to measuring values in survey research. On the basis of data from the 1980 General Social Survey, this article evaluates the comparability of results obtained using rankings and ratings of valued qualities. The comparison focuses on (1) the ordering of aggregate value preferences and (2) the measurement of individual differences in latent value preferences. The two methods are judged to be similar with respect to ordering the aggregate preferences of the sample, but dissimilar with regard to the latent variable structure underlying the measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)535-552
Number of pages18
JournalPublic Opinion Quarterly
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1985

Fingerprint

ranking
rating
Values
survey research
Rating
Ranking
Individual Differences
Scarcity
Social Values
Survey Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Alwin, Duane Francis ; Krosnick, Jon A. / The measurement of values in surveys : A comparison of ratings and rankings. In: Public Opinion Quarterly. 1985 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 535-552.
@article{6a40184d6e4b45bdb13ec61bd30279bf,
title = "The measurement of values in surveys: A comparison of ratings and rankings",
abstract = "Social values are most commonly measured using ranking techniques, but there is a scarcity of systematic comparisons between rankings and other approaches to measuring values in survey research. On the basis of data from the 1980 General Social Survey, this article evaluates the comparability of results obtained using rankings and ratings of valued qualities. The comparison focuses on (1) the ordering of aggregate value preferences and (2) the measurement of individual differences in latent value preferences. The two methods are judged to be similar with respect to ordering the aggregate preferences of the sample, but dissimilar with regard to the latent variable structure underlying the measures.",
author = "Alwin, {Duane Francis} and Krosnick, {Jon A.}",
year = "1985",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/268949",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "535--552",
journal = "Public Opinion Quarterly",
issn = "0033-362X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

The measurement of values in surveys : A comparison of ratings and rankings. / Alwin, Duane Francis; Krosnick, Jon A.

In: Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 4, 01.12.1985, p. 535-552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The measurement of values in surveys

T2 - A comparison of ratings and rankings

AU - Alwin, Duane Francis

AU - Krosnick, Jon A.

PY - 1985/12/1

Y1 - 1985/12/1

N2 - Social values are most commonly measured using ranking techniques, but there is a scarcity of systematic comparisons between rankings and other approaches to measuring values in survey research. On the basis of data from the 1980 General Social Survey, this article evaluates the comparability of results obtained using rankings and ratings of valued qualities. The comparison focuses on (1) the ordering of aggregate value preferences and (2) the measurement of individual differences in latent value preferences. The two methods are judged to be similar with respect to ordering the aggregate preferences of the sample, but dissimilar with regard to the latent variable structure underlying the measures.

AB - Social values are most commonly measured using ranking techniques, but there is a scarcity of systematic comparisons between rankings and other approaches to measuring values in survey research. On the basis of data from the 1980 General Social Survey, this article evaluates the comparability of results obtained using rankings and ratings of valued qualities. The comparison focuses on (1) the ordering of aggregate value preferences and (2) the measurement of individual differences in latent value preferences. The two methods are judged to be similar with respect to ordering the aggregate preferences of the sample, but dissimilar with regard to the latent variable structure underlying the measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001157455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001157455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/268949

DO - 10.1086/268949

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 535

EP - 552

JO - Public Opinion Quarterly

JF - Public Opinion Quarterly

SN - 0033-362X

IS - 4

ER -