The mechanics of perfection: Philosophy, theology, and the foundations of American law

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

American philosophy of law is better understood as theology than as that traditional American academic or pragmatic discourse that styles itself philosophy. The mechanics of an American philosophy of law provides a basis in reason for an American theology of faith in the perfectibility of law. The relationship among reason, faith, and truth (perfection) better defines an American philosophy of law than do traditional, merely rational, conceptions. This essay first examines the archetypal framework within which Americans work through their theology and construct their rational analytic frameworks for that purpose through the prism of two foundational cases, Swift v. Tyson (1842) and Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1938), and its transposition to American legal positivism. It then suggests that Benedict XVI's 2006 articulation of the foundational relationship between faith (theology) and reason (philosophy) is a better basis for understanding the American theology of law, the function of philosophy within that theology, and the role of the magisterium of judges in its elaboration. Since the settlement of Plymouth Bay and the Virginia colonies, Americans have been obsessed with the mechanics of perfectibility. Perfectibility is built into the constitutive documents of the American republic. The preamble to the American Constitution declares the establishment of the American union: “in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationOn Philosophy in American Law
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages44-52
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9780511576386
ISBN (Print)9780521883689
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

theology
mechanic
philosophy of law
Law
faith
legal positivism
railroad
philosophy
republic
constitution
pragmatics
welfare
justice
discourse

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Backer, Larry Cata. / The mechanics of perfection : Philosophy, theology, and the foundations of American law. On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 44-52
@inbook{3af835fffd6e40a2a9872f195130fd20,
title = "The mechanics of perfection: Philosophy, theology, and the foundations of American law",
abstract = "American philosophy of law is better understood as theology than as that traditional American academic or pragmatic discourse that styles itself philosophy. The mechanics of an American philosophy of law provides a basis in reason for an American theology of faith in the perfectibility of law. The relationship among reason, faith, and truth (perfection) better defines an American philosophy of law than do traditional, merely rational, conceptions. This essay first examines the archetypal framework within which Americans work through their theology and construct their rational analytic frameworks for that purpose through the prism of two foundational cases, Swift v. Tyson (1842) and Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1938), and its transposition to American legal positivism. It then suggests that Benedict XVI's 2006 articulation of the foundational relationship between faith (theology) and reason (philosophy) is a better basis for understanding the American theology of law, the function of philosophy within that theology, and the role of the magisterium of judges in its elaboration. Since the settlement of Plymouth Bay and the Virginia colonies, Americans have been obsessed with the mechanics of perfectibility. Perfectibility is built into the constitutive documents of the American republic. The preamble to the American Constitution declares the establishment of the American union: “in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”",
author = "Backer, {Larry Cata}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511576386.007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521883689",
pages = "44--52",
booktitle = "On Philosophy in American Law",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

The mechanics of perfection : Philosophy, theology, and the foundations of American law. / Backer, Larry Cata.

On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 44-52.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The mechanics of perfection

T2 - Philosophy, theology, and the foundations of American law

AU - Backer, Larry Cata

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - American philosophy of law is better understood as theology than as that traditional American academic or pragmatic discourse that styles itself philosophy. The mechanics of an American philosophy of law provides a basis in reason for an American theology of faith in the perfectibility of law. The relationship among reason, faith, and truth (perfection) better defines an American philosophy of law than do traditional, merely rational, conceptions. This essay first examines the archetypal framework within which Americans work through their theology and construct their rational analytic frameworks for that purpose through the prism of two foundational cases, Swift v. Tyson (1842) and Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1938), and its transposition to American legal positivism. It then suggests that Benedict XVI's 2006 articulation of the foundational relationship between faith (theology) and reason (philosophy) is a better basis for understanding the American theology of law, the function of philosophy within that theology, and the role of the magisterium of judges in its elaboration. Since the settlement of Plymouth Bay and the Virginia colonies, Americans have been obsessed with the mechanics of perfectibility. Perfectibility is built into the constitutive documents of the American republic. The preamble to the American Constitution declares the establishment of the American union: “in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”

AB - American philosophy of law is better understood as theology than as that traditional American academic or pragmatic discourse that styles itself philosophy. The mechanics of an American philosophy of law provides a basis in reason for an American theology of faith in the perfectibility of law. The relationship among reason, faith, and truth (perfection) better defines an American philosophy of law than do traditional, merely rational, conceptions. This essay first examines the archetypal framework within which Americans work through their theology and construct their rational analytic frameworks for that purpose through the prism of two foundational cases, Swift v. Tyson (1842) and Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1938), and its transposition to American legal positivism. It then suggests that Benedict XVI's 2006 articulation of the foundational relationship between faith (theology) and reason (philosophy) is a better basis for understanding the American theology of law, the function of philosophy within that theology, and the role of the magisterium of judges in its elaboration. Since the settlement of Plymouth Bay and the Virginia colonies, Americans have been obsessed with the mechanics of perfectibility. Perfectibility is built into the constitutive documents of the American republic. The preamble to the American Constitution declares the establishment of the American union: “in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926983686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926983686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511576386.007

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511576386.007

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84926983686

SN - 9780521883689

SP - 44

EP - 52

BT - On Philosophy in American Law

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -