The Modeling and Measurement of HF Antenna Skywave Radiation Patterns in Irregular Terrain

James Kenneth Breakall, J. S. Young, G. H. Hagn, R. W. Adler, D. L. Faust, Douglas Henry Werner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Method of Moments (MoM) was used in conjunction with the Geometric Theory of Diffraction (GTD) for predicting the elevation-plane radiation patterns of simple high-frequency (HF) vertical monopoles and horizontal dipoles situated in irregular terrain. The three-dimensional terrain was approximated by seven connected flat plates that were very wide relative to the largest wavelength of interest The plate length along the terrain profile was the longest possible that still adequately followed the shape of the path on the azimuth of the elevation pattern of interest and no shorter than 1 wavelength at the lowest frequency of interest The MoM model was used to determine the antenna currents under the assumption that the terrain was planar (i.e., locally flat) over the distance pertinent to establishing the input impedance. The currents thus derived were used as inputs to the GTD model to determine the gain versus elevation angle of the antennas for HF skywave when situated in the irregular terrain. The surface wave solution for groundwave was not included since this does not appreciably contribute any effect to the skywave farfield patterns at HF in this case. The model predictions were made using perfect electric conducting (PEC) plates and using thin plates made of lossy dielectric material with the same conductivity and relative permittivity as measured for the soil. These computed results were compared with experimental elevation-plane pattern data obtained using a single-frequency helicopter-borne beacon transmitter towed on a long dielectric rope in the far field on a linear path directly over the antennas. The monopoles and dipoles were situated in front of, on top of, and behind a hill whose elevation above the flat surrounding terrain was about 45 m. The patterns of all of the antenna types and sitings exhibited diffraction effects caused by the irregular terrain, with the largest effects being observed at the highest measurement frequency (27 MHz). The results for the PEC plates and the lossy dielectric plates were essentially identical for the horizontal dipoles, whereas the lossy dielectric plates were required to properly match the measured results for the vertical monopoles. The gain of the antennas in irregular terrain and the gain of the same antennas situated in flat, open terrain differed by up to 20 dB at the lower elevation angles (e.g., 3°-5°). This difference in gain is significant for most HF systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)936-945
Number of pages10
JournalIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Volume42
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

antenna radiation patterns
Directional patterns (antenna)
Antennas
antennas
Diffraction
Method of moments
monopoles
elevation angle
method of moments
dipoles
Wavelength
diffraction
Helicopters
Surface waves
conduction
Transmitters
beacons
Permittivity
helicopters
thin plates

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{3de33d0cc6614ec8801d4e75d3dc4bf3,
title = "The Modeling and Measurement of HF Antenna Skywave Radiation Patterns in Irregular Terrain",
abstract = "The Method of Moments (MoM) was used in conjunction with the Geometric Theory of Diffraction (GTD) for predicting the elevation-plane radiation patterns of simple high-frequency (HF) vertical monopoles and horizontal dipoles situated in irregular terrain. The three-dimensional terrain was approximated by seven connected flat plates that were very wide relative to the largest wavelength of interest The plate length along the terrain profile was the longest possible that still adequately followed the shape of the path on the azimuth of the elevation pattern of interest and no shorter than 1 wavelength at the lowest frequency of interest The MoM model was used to determine the antenna currents under the assumption that the terrain was planar (i.e., locally flat) over the distance pertinent to establishing the input impedance. The currents thus derived were used as inputs to the GTD model to determine the gain versus elevation angle of the antennas for HF skywave when situated in the irregular terrain. The surface wave solution for groundwave was not included since this does not appreciably contribute any effect to the skywave farfield patterns at HF in this case. The model predictions were made using perfect electric conducting (PEC) plates and using thin plates made of lossy dielectric material with the same conductivity and relative permittivity as measured for the soil. These computed results were compared with experimental elevation-plane pattern data obtained using a single-frequency helicopter-borne beacon transmitter towed on a long dielectric rope in the far field on a linear path directly over the antennas. The monopoles and dipoles were situated in front of, on top of, and behind a hill whose elevation above the flat surrounding terrain was about 45 m. The patterns of all of the antenna types and sitings exhibited diffraction effects caused by the irregular terrain, with the largest effects being observed at the highest measurement frequency (27 MHz). The results for the PEC plates and the lossy dielectric plates were essentially identical for the horizontal dipoles, whereas the lossy dielectric plates were required to properly match the measured results for the vertical monopoles. The gain of the antennas in irregular terrain and the gain of the same antennas situated in flat, open terrain differed by up to 20 dB at the lower elevation angles (e.g., 3°-5°). This difference in gain is significant for most HF systems.",
author = "Breakall, {James Kenneth} and Young, {J. S.} and Hagn, {G. H.} and Adler, {R. W.} and Faust, {D. L.} and Werner, {Douglas Henry}",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/8.299595",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "936--945",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation",
issn = "0018-926X",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "7",

}

The Modeling and Measurement of HF Antenna Skywave Radiation Patterns in Irregular Terrain. / Breakall, James Kenneth; Young, J. S.; Hagn, G. H.; Adler, R. W.; Faust, D. L.; Werner, Douglas Henry.

In: IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 42, No. 7, 01.01.1994, p. 936-945.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Modeling and Measurement of HF Antenna Skywave Radiation Patterns in Irregular Terrain

AU - Breakall, James Kenneth

AU - Young, J. S.

AU - Hagn, G. H.

AU - Adler, R. W.

AU - Faust, D. L.

AU - Werner, Douglas Henry

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - The Method of Moments (MoM) was used in conjunction with the Geometric Theory of Diffraction (GTD) for predicting the elevation-plane radiation patterns of simple high-frequency (HF) vertical monopoles and horizontal dipoles situated in irregular terrain. The three-dimensional terrain was approximated by seven connected flat plates that were very wide relative to the largest wavelength of interest The plate length along the terrain profile was the longest possible that still adequately followed the shape of the path on the azimuth of the elevation pattern of interest and no shorter than 1 wavelength at the lowest frequency of interest The MoM model was used to determine the antenna currents under the assumption that the terrain was planar (i.e., locally flat) over the distance pertinent to establishing the input impedance. The currents thus derived were used as inputs to the GTD model to determine the gain versus elevation angle of the antennas for HF skywave when situated in the irregular terrain. The surface wave solution for groundwave was not included since this does not appreciably contribute any effect to the skywave farfield patterns at HF in this case. The model predictions were made using perfect electric conducting (PEC) plates and using thin plates made of lossy dielectric material with the same conductivity and relative permittivity as measured for the soil. These computed results were compared with experimental elevation-plane pattern data obtained using a single-frequency helicopter-borne beacon transmitter towed on a long dielectric rope in the far field on a linear path directly over the antennas. The monopoles and dipoles were situated in front of, on top of, and behind a hill whose elevation above the flat surrounding terrain was about 45 m. The patterns of all of the antenna types and sitings exhibited diffraction effects caused by the irregular terrain, with the largest effects being observed at the highest measurement frequency (27 MHz). The results for the PEC plates and the lossy dielectric plates were essentially identical for the horizontal dipoles, whereas the lossy dielectric plates were required to properly match the measured results for the vertical monopoles. The gain of the antennas in irregular terrain and the gain of the same antennas situated in flat, open terrain differed by up to 20 dB at the lower elevation angles (e.g., 3°-5°). This difference in gain is significant for most HF systems.

AB - The Method of Moments (MoM) was used in conjunction with the Geometric Theory of Diffraction (GTD) for predicting the elevation-plane radiation patterns of simple high-frequency (HF) vertical monopoles and horizontal dipoles situated in irregular terrain. The three-dimensional terrain was approximated by seven connected flat plates that were very wide relative to the largest wavelength of interest The plate length along the terrain profile was the longest possible that still adequately followed the shape of the path on the azimuth of the elevation pattern of interest and no shorter than 1 wavelength at the lowest frequency of interest The MoM model was used to determine the antenna currents under the assumption that the terrain was planar (i.e., locally flat) over the distance pertinent to establishing the input impedance. The currents thus derived were used as inputs to the GTD model to determine the gain versus elevation angle of the antennas for HF skywave when situated in the irregular terrain. The surface wave solution for groundwave was not included since this does not appreciably contribute any effect to the skywave farfield patterns at HF in this case. The model predictions were made using perfect electric conducting (PEC) plates and using thin plates made of lossy dielectric material with the same conductivity and relative permittivity as measured for the soil. These computed results were compared with experimental elevation-plane pattern data obtained using a single-frequency helicopter-borne beacon transmitter towed on a long dielectric rope in the far field on a linear path directly over the antennas. The monopoles and dipoles were situated in front of, on top of, and behind a hill whose elevation above the flat surrounding terrain was about 45 m. The patterns of all of the antenna types and sitings exhibited diffraction effects caused by the irregular terrain, with the largest effects being observed at the highest measurement frequency (27 MHz). The results for the PEC plates and the lossy dielectric plates were essentially identical for the horizontal dipoles, whereas the lossy dielectric plates were required to properly match the measured results for the vertical monopoles. The gain of the antennas in irregular terrain and the gain of the same antennas situated in flat, open terrain differed by up to 20 dB at the lower elevation angles (e.g., 3°-5°). This difference in gain is significant for most HF systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028463974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028463974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/8.299595

DO - 10.1109/8.299595

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 936

EP - 945

JO - IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

JF - IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

SN - 0018-926X

IS - 7

ER -