During a 1951 press conference upon his arrival in Hiroshima, the Japanese-American artist Isamu Noguchi startled reporters with the comment “Hiroshima is probably the most modern city in the world”. Noguchi’s statement expressed the ambivalence many in Japan and beyond felt towards Hiroshima in the aftermath of the bomb. Hiroshima was an expression of a modern nightmare, a failure of the enlightenment narrative of science and progress, but Hiroshima was also a tabula rasa, an urban space open for a complete reconstruction of the city, and “[for] clearing the blinders of convention to enable a bold modernity”. Indeed, the ambivalent and conflicting meanings of the bombing continued to plague the commemoration of the bombing and rebuilding of the stricken city. This paper examines Hiroshima's relation to nuclear modernity through a look at the controversy surrounding the rejection of Isamu Noguchi's design for the Hiroshima cenotaph. During the debates sparked by the design and its rejection, competing visions of Hiroshima's identity and relation to the bomb were displayed and argued about as postwar Hiroshima tried to make peace with its modern past.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Management Science and Operations Research