TY - JOUR
T1 - The National Academy of Kinesiology 2020 Review and Evaluation of Doctoral Programs in Kinesiology
AU - Challis, John H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - The results of the 2020 review and ranking of U.S. doctoral programs in kinesiology conducted by the National Academy of Kinesiology (NAK) are presented. These results represent data collected for the 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 calendar years for 43 programs. The rankings reflect data collected on program faculty (productivity, funding, and visibility) and program students (admissions, support, publications, and employment). The data for each assessment index were first transformed into z scores, and then the z scores converted into T-scores. Weights were applied to the T-scores of the indices and then summed to obtain a total T-score. Programs were ranked in two ways: one based on the total T-scores from the data not normalized (unadjusted) and the other with total T-scores from the data normalized with respect to the number of faculty members in each program (adjusted). In addition to program rankings, descriptive data are presented on faculty and student data.
AB - The results of the 2020 review and ranking of U.S. doctoral programs in kinesiology conducted by the National Academy of Kinesiology (NAK) are presented. These results represent data collected for the 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 calendar years for 43 programs. The rankings reflect data collected on program faculty (productivity, funding, and visibility) and program students (admissions, support, publications, and employment). The data for each assessment index were first transformed into z scores, and then the z scores converted into T-scores. Weights were applied to the T-scores of the indices and then summed to obtain a total T-score. Programs were ranked in two ways: one based on the total T-scores from the data not normalized (unadjusted) and the other with total T-scores from the data normalized with respect to the number of faculty members in each program (adjusted). In addition to program rankings, descriptive data are presented on faculty and student data.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102239193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102239193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/KR.2020-0049
DO - 10.1123/KR.2020-0049
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85102239193
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - Kinesiology Review
JF - Kinesiology Review
SN - 2163-0453
IS - 1
ER -