The National and Cosmopolitan Dimensions of Disciplinarity

Reconsidering the Origins of Communication Studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using the first five years of the Quarterly Journal of Speech as a record of Communication Studies' founding, I contend that the discipline began with a tension between contrasting sets of affect and reasoning. In the initial volumes of QJS, one reads many recommendations designed to establish the discipline's academic sovereignty and self-determination, but, at the same time, other essays suggest a commitment to cross-disciplinary inquiry and citizenship. I interpret this tension through contemporary theories of nationalism and cosmopolitanism. These concepts highlight the implications of competing visions for the discipline's future, but they also reveal how cosmopolitan and nationalist processes complemented one another in the early years of “Speech.” I argue, finally, that this tension provides opportunities for Communication Studies in the twenty-first century.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-257
Number of pages14
JournalQuarterly Journal of Speech
Volume101
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2015

Fingerprint

communication
Communication
cosmopolitanism
self-determination
twenty-first century
sovereignty
nationalism
citizenship
commitment
Disciplinarity
Communication Studies
Cross-disciplinary
Citizenship
Nationalists
Self-determination
Sovereignty
Nationalism
Founding
Cosmopolitanism
Academic Discipline

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education

Cite this

@article{d51fc4cb320047339a07e8548121aca3,
title = "The National and Cosmopolitan Dimensions of Disciplinarity: Reconsidering the Origins of Communication Studies",
abstract = "Using the first five years of the Quarterly Journal of Speech as a record of Communication Studies' founding, I contend that the discipline began with a tension between contrasting sets of affect and reasoning. In the initial volumes of QJS, one reads many recommendations designed to establish the discipline's academic sovereignty and self-determination, but, at the same time, other essays suggest a commitment to cross-disciplinary inquiry and citizenship. I interpret this tension through contemporary theories of nationalism and cosmopolitanism. These concepts highlight the implications of competing visions for the discipline's future, but they also reveal how cosmopolitan and nationalist processes complemented one another in the early years of “Speech.” I argue, finally, that this tension provides opportunities for Communication Studies in the twenty-first century.",
author = "Wilson, {Kirtley Hasketh}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/00335630.2015.995437",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "244--257",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Speech",
issn = "0033-5630",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The National and Cosmopolitan Dimensions of Disciplinarity

T2 - Reconsidering the Origins of Communication Studies

AU - Wilson, Kirtley Hasketh

PY - 2015/1/2

Y1 - 2015/1/2

N2 - Using the first five years of the Quarterly Journal of Speech as a record of Communication Studies' founding, I contend that the discipline began with a tension between contrasting sets of affect and reasoning. In the initial volumes of QJS, one reads many recommendations designed to establish the discipline's academic sovereignty and self-determination, but, at the same time, other essays suggest a commitment to cross-disciplinary inquiry and citizenship. I interpret this tension through contemporary theories of nationalism and cosmopolitanism. These concepts highlight the implications of competing visions for the discipline's future, but they also reveal how cosmopolitan and nationalist processes complemented one another in the early years of “Speech.” I argue, finally, that this tension provides opportunities for Communication Studies in the twenty-first century.

AB - Using the first five years of the Quarterly Journal of Speech as a record of Communication Studies' founding, I contend that the discipline began with a tension between contrasting sets of affect and reasoning. In the initial volumes of QJS, one reads many recommendations designed to establish the discipline's academic sovereignty and self-determination, but, at the same time, other essays suggest a commitment to cross-disciplinary inquiry and citizenship. I interpret this tension through contemporary theories of nationalism and cosmopolitanism. These concepts highlight the implications of competing visions for the discipline's future, but they also reveal how cosmopolitan and nationalist processes complemented one another in the early years of “Speech.” I argue, finally, that this tension provides opportunities for Communication Studies in the twenty-first century.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922470276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922470276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00335630.2015.995437

DO - 10.1080/00335630.2015.995437

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 244

EP - 257

JO - Quarterly Journal of Speech

JF - Quarterly Journal of Speech

SN - 0033-5630

IS - 1

ER -