The need for microsimulation to evaluate osteoporosis interventions

David Vanness, Anna N.A. Tosteson, Sherine E. Gabriel, L. Joseph Melton

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Simulations play an increasingly important role in the evaluation of osteoporosis interventions. Existing evaluations have been based on "reduced-form" cohort simulations that do not reflect the complexity and heterogeneity of osteoporosis and its outcomes. Such simplified models offer parsimony and ease of use, but they also are limited in their ability to explain and extrapolate outcomes in a way that is most useful for both clinical and health policy decision makers. Alternatively, evaluations could be based on "structural" microsimulations, which explicitly model the underlying biology of osteoporosis at the individual level. The structural approach presents technical challenges, including the need to obtain more-detailed data and the requirement that underlying biological models be validated. However, evaluations based on structural microsimulation may ultimately provide substantially more useful information, resulting in improved decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-358
Number of pages6
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2005

Fingerprint

Osteoporosis
Biological Models
Aptitude
Health Policy
Administrative Personnel
Decision Making

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Vanness, David ; Tosteson, Anna N.A. ; Gabriel, Sherine E. ; Melton, L. Joseph. / The need for microsimulation to evaluate osteoporosis interventions. In: Osteoporosis International. 2005 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 353-358.
@article{338f4fae328246cb99c2a7847c72e8d6,
title = "The need for microsimulation to evaluate osteoporosis interventions",
abstract = "Simulations play an increasingly important role in the evaluation of osteoporosis interventions. Existing evaluations have been based on {"}reduced-form{"} cohort simulations that do not reflect the complexity and heterogeneity of osteoporosis and its outcomes. Such simplified models offer parsimony and ease of use, but they also are limited in their ability to explain and extrapolate outcomes in a way that is most useful for both clinical and health policy decision makers. Alternatively, evaluations could be based on {"}structural{"} microsimulations, which explicitly model the underlying biology of osteoporosis at the individual level. The structural approach presents technical challenges, including the need to obtain more-detailed data and the requirement that underlying biological models be validated. However, evaluations based on structural microsimulation may ultimately provide substantially more useful information, resulting in improved decision making.",
author = "David Vanness and Tosteson, {Anna N.A.} and Gabriel, {Sherine E.} and Melton, {L. Joseph}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00198-004-1826-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "353--358",
journal = "Osteoporosis International",
issn = "0937-941X",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "4",

}

The need for microsimulation to evaluate osteoporosis interventions. / Vanness, David; Tosteson, Anna N.A.; Gabriel, Sherine E.; Melton, L. Joseph.

In: Osteoporosis International, Vol. 16, No. 4, 01.04.2005, p. 353-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The need for microsimulation to evaluate osteoporosis interventions

AU - Vanness, David

AU - Tosteson, Anna N.A.

AU - Gabriel, Sherine E.

AU - Melton, L. Joseph

PY - 2005/4/1

Y1 - 2005/4/1

N2 - Simulations play an increasingly important role in the evaluation of osteoporosis interventions. Existing evaluations have been based on "reduced-form" cohort simulations that do not reflect the complexity and heterogeneity of osteoporosis and its outcomes. Such simplified models offer parsimony and ease of use, but they also are limited in their ability to explain and extrapolate outcomes in a way that is most useful for both clinical and health policy decision makers. Alternatively, evaluations could be based on "structural" microsimulations, which explicitly model the underlying biology of osteoporosis at the individual level. The structural approach presents technical challenges, including the need to obtain more-detailed data and the requirement that underlying biological models be validated. However, evaluations based on structural microsimulation may ultimately provide substantially more useful information, resulting in improved decision making.

AB - Simulations play an increasingly important role in the evaluation of osteoporosis interventions. Existing evaluations have been based on "reduced-form" cohort simulations that do not reflect the complexity and heterogeneity of osteoporosis and its outcomes. Such simplified models offer parsimony and ease of use, but they also are limited in their ability to explain and extrapolate outcomes in a way that is most useful for both clinical and health policy decision makers. Alternatively, evaluations could be based on "structural" microsimulations, which explicitly model the underlying biology of osteoporosis at the individual level. The structural approach presents technical challenges, including the need to obtain more-detailed data and the requirement that underlying biological models be validated. However, evaluations based on structural microsimulation may ultimately provide substantially more useful information, resulting in improved decision making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16844385620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16844385620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00198-004-1826-8

DO - 10.1007/s00198-004-1826-8

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15645319

AN - SCOPUS:16844385620

VL - 16

SP - 353

EP - 358

JO - Osteoporosis International

JF - Osteoporosis International

SN - 0937-941X

IS - 4

ER -