The "open letter"

radiologists' reports in the era of patient web portals

Michael Bruno, Jonelle Thomas, Michael J. Mohr, Sigall K. Bell, Stephen D. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Historically, radiologists' official written reports have functionally been proprietary communications between radiologists and referring providers. Although never secret, these reports have traditionally been archived in the medical record, with tightly controlled access. Patients rarely viewed reports directly. As patient-centered care, transparent communication, and electronic archiving have converged, however, radiologists' reports, like many other medical record components, are increasingly accessible to patients via web-based "portals." Many radiologists harbor justified anxiety about whether and how radiology reports should change in response to these portals. Direct patient access to radiology reports raises several questions, including: who are reports really for, what is their essential purpose, what content should they include or omit, what limits should be placed on their accessibility, and what ethical and legal ramifications arise from the reports' unfettered accessibility. In this paper, we outline the challenges and opportunities that arise from direct patient access to radiology reports via web-based portals, and propose an approach to optimizing radiologists' reports in an era of enhanced transparency. We conclude that, in effect, the health information web portal is a "train which has left the station"; patient portals are a nationwide reality, and transparency is now a public and professional expectation. Radiologists urgently need to consider quality implications for their report writing in order to address the challenges these developments pose, and to best harness the potential benefits for patients and providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)863-867
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
Volume11
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

Radiology
Medical Records
Communication
Patient-Centered Care
Radiologists
Patient Portals
Anxiety
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{b6719db73da3443c9e647da43b0ad98f,
title = "The {"}open letter{"}: radiologists' reports in the era of patient web portals",
abstract = "Historically, radiologists' official written reports have functionally been proprietary communications between radiologists and referring providers. Although never secret, these reports have traditionally been archived in the medical record, with tightly controlled access. Patients rarely viewed reports directly. As patient-centered care, transparent communication, and electronic archiving have converged, however, radiologists' reports, like many other medical record components, are increasingly accessible to patients via web-based {"}portals.{"} Many radiologists harbor justified anxiety about whether and how radiology reports should change in response to these portals. Direct patient access to radiology reports raises several questions, including: who are reports really for, what is their essential purpose, what content should they include or omit, what limits should be placed on their accessibility, and what ethical and legal ramifications arise from the reports' unfettered accessibility. In this paper, we outline the challenges and opportunities that arise from direct patient access to radiology reports via web-based portals, and propose an approach to optimizing radiologists' reports in an era of enhanced transparency. We conclude that, in effect, the health information web portal is a {"}train which has left the station{"}; patient portals are a nationwide reality, and transparency is now a public and professional expectation. Radiologists urgently need to consider quality implications for their report writing in order to address the challenges these developments pose, and to best harness the potential benefits for patients and providers.",
author = "Michael Bruno and Jonelle Thomas and Mohr, {Michael J.} and Bell, {Sigall K.} and Brown, {Stephen D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "863--867",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "9",

}

The "open letter" : radiologists' reports in the era of patient web portals. / Bruno, Michael; Thomas, Jonelle; Mohr, Michael J.; Bell, Sigall K.; Brown, Stephen D.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, Vol. 11, No. 9, 01.09.2014, p. 863-867.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The "open letter"

T2 - radiologists' reports in the era of patient web portals

AU - Bruno, Michael

AU - Thomas, Jonelle

AU - Mohr, Michael J.

AU - Bell, Sigall K.

AU - Brown, Stephen D.

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Historically, radiologists' official written reports have functionally been proprietary communications between radiologists and referring providers. Although never secret, these reports have traditionally been archived in the medical record, with tightly controlled access. Patients rarely viewed reports directly. As patient-centered care, transparent communication, and electronic archiving have converged, however, radiologists' reports, like many other medical record components, are increasingly accessible to patients via web-based "portals." Many radiologists harbor justified anxiety about whether and how radiology reports should change in response to these portals. Direct patient access to radiology reports raises several questions, including: who are reports really for, what is their essential purpose, what content should they include or omit, what limits should be placed on their accessibility, and what ethical and legal ramifications arise from the reports' unfettered accessibility. In this paper, we outline the challenges and opportunities that arise from direct patient access to radiology reports via web-based portals, and propose an approach to optimizing radiologists' reports in an era of enhanced transparency. We conclude that, in effect, the health information web portal is a "train which has left the station"; patient portals are a nationwide reality, and transparency is now a public and professional expectation. Radiologists urgently need to consider quality implications for their report writing in order to address the challenges these developments pose, and to best harness the potential benefits for patients and providers.

AB - Historically, radiologists' official written reports have functionally been proprietary communications between radiologists and referring providers. Although never secret, these reports have traditionally been archived in the medical record, with tightly controlled access. Patients rarely viewed reports directly. As patient-centered care, transparent communication, and electronic archiving have converged, however, radiologists' reports, like many other medical record components, are increasingly accessible to patients via web-based "portals." Many radiologists harbor justified anxiety about whether and how radiology reports should change in response to these portals. Direct patient access to radiology reports raises several questions, including: who are reports really for, what is their essential purpose, what content should they include or omit, what limits should be placed on their accessibility, and what ethical and legal ramifications arise from the reports' unfettered accessibility. In this paper, we outline the challenges and opportunities that arise from direct patient access to radiology reports via web-based portals, and propose an approach to optimizing radiologists' reports in an era of enhanced transparency. We conclude that, in effect, the health information web portal is a "train which has left the station"; patient portals are a nationwide reality, and transparency is now a public and professional expectation. Radiologists urgently need to consider quality implications for their report writing in order to address the challenges these developments pose, and to best harness the potential benefits for patients and providers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027930189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027930189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.014

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 863

EP - 867

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 9

ER -