The paradox of regret: Remembering and forgetting the history of slavery in George W. Bush's Gorée Island address

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Ceremonial statements of regret from state actors may appear to lack discernible gains compared to historic procedures of reconciliation or political reunification; yet the ceremonial language of these statements influences public perceptions of historical justice, moral wisdom and democratic virtue. This essay analyzes President George W. Bush's historic address on the transatlantic slave trade as an excellent case study in the rhetoric of regret (distinct from that of official apology and the like). Such occasions warrant scrutiny because a critical paradox-the inherent divide between dutiful remembrance of past wrongs and practical political duties that would set them aright-shapes state officials' increasingly prevalent use of ceremonial lamentations in pursuit of geopolitical legitimacy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-38
Number of pages34
JournalHistory and Memory
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

History
Slavery
Forgetting
George W. Bush
Ceremonial
Remembering
Paradox
Historic
Rhetoric
Legitimacy
Justice
Language
Transatlantic Slave Trade
Remembrance
Warrants
Lamentations
Wisdom
Reconciliation
Scrutiny
Apology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History

Cite this

@article{717774825e524ea5b980cf6060ae3c4d,
title = "The paradox of regret: Remembering and forgetting the history of slavery in George W. Bush's Gor{\'e}e Island address",
abstract = "Ceremonial statements of regret from state actors may appear to lack discernible gains compared to historic procedures of reconciliation or political reunification; yet the ceremonial language of these statements influences public perceptions of historical justice, moral wisdom and democratic virtue. This essay analyzes President George W. Bush's historic address on the transatlantic slave trade as an excellent case study in the rhetoric of regret (distinct from that of official apology and the like). Such occasions warrant scrutiny because a critical paradox-the inherent divide between dutiful remembrance of past wrongs and practical political duties that would set them aright-shapes state officials' increasingly prevalent use of ceremonial lamentations in pursuit of geopolitical legitimacy.",
author = "Bradford Vivian",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/ham.2012.0000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "5--38",
journal = "History & Memory",
issn = "0935-560X",
publisher = "Athenaum",
number = "1",

}

The paradox of regret : Remembering and forgetting the history of slavery in George W. Bush's Gorée Island address. / Vivian, Bradford.

In: History and Memory, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.03.2012, p. 5-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The paradox of regret

T2 - Remembering and forgetting the history of slavery in George W. Bush's Gorée Island address

AU - Vivian, Bradford

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Ceremonial statements of regret from state actors may appear to lack discernible gains compared to historic procedures of reconciliation or political reunification; yet the ceremonial language of these statements influences public perceptions of historical justice, moral wisdom and democratic virtue. This essay analyzes President George W. Bush's historic address on the transatlantic slave trade as an excellent case study in the rhetoric of regret (distinct from that of official apology and the like). Such occasions warrant scrutiny because a critical paradox-the inherent divide between dutiful remembrance of past wrongs and practical political duties that would set them aright-shapes state officials' increasingly prevalent use of ceremonial lamentations in pursuit of geopolitical legitimacy.

AB - Ceremonial statements of regret from state actors may appear to lack discernible gains compared to historic procedures of reconciliation or political reunification; yet the ceremonial language of these statements influences public perceptions of historical justice, moral wisdom and democratic virtue. This essay analyzes President George W. Bush's historic address on the transatlantic slave trade as an excellent case study in the rhetoric of regret (distinct from that of official apology and the like). Such occasions warrant scrutiny because a critical paradox-the inherent divide between dutiful remembrance of past wrongs and practical political duties that would set them aright-shapes state officials' increasingly prevalent use of ceremonial lamentations in pursuit of geopolitical legitimacy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908407576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908407576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/ham.2012.0000

DO - 10.1353/ham.2012.0000

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84908407576

VL - 24

SP - 5

EP - 38

JO - History & Memory

JF - History & Memory

SN - 0935-560X

IS - 1

ER -