The past is not dead: Legacy identification and alumni ambivalence in the wake of the sandusky scandal at Penn State

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate how the temporal effects of past, present, and future influence organizational identification. We examine an underrepresented but important stakeholder group-organizational alumni-whose prior organizational experiences can leave a “legacy identification,” such that alumni continue to define themselves in terms of the organization's ideals and values, even after leaving. We examined alumni responses to the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal at Penn State by analyzing a subset of more than 25,000 communications sent by more than 14,000 alumni in the year following the scandal. We found that alumni drew upon their legacy identification as they went through an emotion-laden struggle involving predominantly positive experiences in the past, predominantly negative experiences in the present, and uncertain experiences in the future. We show how targeting processes toward insiders and outsiders affect identification states, including three previously undocumented forms of ambivalent identification: “reconciled identification,” “selective identification,” and “conditional identification.” Our grounded model illustrates the broad applicability of the legacy identification concept, which has strong implications for studying the temporality and complexity of identification processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)826-856
Number of pages31
JournalAcademy of Management Journal
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Identification (control systems)
Communication
Scandal
Ambivalence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{82965c154b39406bafc36e1bf7a5d8b8,
title = "The past is not dead: Legacy identification and alumni ambivalence in the wake of the sandusky scandal at Penn State",
abstract = "We investigate how the temporal effects of past, present, and future influence organizational identification. We examine an underrepresented but important stakeholder group-organizational alumni-whose prior organizational experiences can leave a “legacy identification,” such that alumni continue to define themselves in terms of the organization's ideals and values, even after leaving. We examined alumni responses to the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal at Penn State by analyzing a subset of more than 25,000 communications sent by more than 14,000 alumni in the year following the scandal. We found that alumni drew upon their legacy identification as they went through an emotion-laden struggle involving predominantly positive experiences in the past, predominantly negative experiences in the present, and uncertain experiences in the future. We show how targeting processes toward insiders and outsiders affect identification states, including three previously undocumented forms of ambivalent identification: “reconciled identification,” “selective identification,” and “conditional identification.” Our grounded model illustrates the broad applicability of the legacy identification concept, which has strong implications for studying the temporality and complexity of identification processes.",
author = "Eury, {Jennifer Lynn} and Glen Kreiner and Trevino, {Linda K.} and Gioia, {Dennis Arnold}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amj.2015.0534",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "826--856",
journal = "Academy of Management Journal",
issn = "0001-4273",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The past is not dead

T2 - Legacy identification and alumni ambivalence in the wake of the sandusky scandal at Penn State

AU - Eury, Jennifer Lynn

AU - Kreiner, Glen

AU - Trevino, Linda K.

AU - Gioia, Dennis Arnold

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - We investigate how the temporal effects of past, present, and future influence organizational identification. We examine an underrepresented but important stakeholder group-organizational alumni-whose prior organizational experiences can leave a “legacy identification,” such that alumni continue to define themselves in terms of the organization's ideals and values, even after leaving. We examined alumni responses to the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal at Penn State by analyzing a subset of more than 25,000 communications sent by more than 14,000 alumni in the year following the scandal. We found that alumni drew upon their legacy identification as they went through an emotion-laden struggle involving predominantly positive experiences in the past, predominantly negative experiences in the present, and uncertain experiences in the future. We show how targeting processes toward insiders and outsiders affect identification states, including three previously undocumented forms of ambivalent identification: “reconciled identification,” “selective identification,” and “conditional identification.” Our grounded model illustrates the broad applicability of the legacy identification concept, which has strong implications for studying the temporality and complexity of identification processes.

AB - We investigate how the temporal effects of past, present, and future influence organizational identification. We examine an underrepresented but important stakeholder group-organizational alumni-whose prior organizational experiences can leave a “legacy identification,” such that alumni continue to define themselves in terms of the organization's ideals and values, even after leaving. We examined alumni responses to the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal at Penn State by analyzing a subset of more than 25,000 communications sent by more than 14,000 alumni in the year following the scandal. We found that alumni drew upon their legacy identification as they went through an emotion-laden struggle involving predominantly positive experiences in the past, predominantly negative experiences in the present, and uncertain experiences in the future. We show how targeting processes toward insiders and outsiders affect identification states, including three previously undocumented forms of ambivalent identification: “reconciled identification,” “selective identification,” and “conditional identification.” Our grounded model illustrates the broad applicability of the legacy identification concept, which has strong implications for studying the temporality and complexity of identification processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048327932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048327932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/amj.2015.0534

DO - 10.5465/amj.2015.0534

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048327932

VL - 61

SP - 826

EP - 856

JO - Academy of Management Journal

JF - Academy of Management Journal

SN - 0001-4273

IS - 3

ER -