The pathological evaluation of the pediatric inguinal hernia sac

William Wenner, Marta Gutenberg, Timothy Crombleholme, Cory Flickinger, Scott P. Bartlett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The College of American Pathologists has suggested that institutions should establish guidelines for the evaluation of the hernia sac. In addition, some states require the submission of this tissue for pathological evaluation. Yet, neither evidence-based guidelines nor published reviews for the evaluation of the pediatric hernia sac are available. Therefore, this retrospective study was conducted to document experience with the evaluation of the pediatric hernia sac. Methods: All reports of the evaluation of hernia sacs submitted to the Department of Pathology during an 8-year period were reviewed. The case of any report that differed in any way from 'consistent with hernia sac' was evaluated for the effect of the findings on the clinical course. Results: A total of 7,924 hernia sacs were submitted on 6,034 patients. Microscopic evaluation was performed on 534. A total of 7,567 (95.4%) submitted specimens on 5,743 patients were 'consistent with hernia sac' and demonstrated no other findings. Three hundred fifty- seven specimens contained findings in addition to hernia sac. In no patient did the results of the evaluation have an effect on the patient care. Conclusions: There is strong evidence that the routine pathological evaluation of pediatric hernia sacs offers little relevant clinical information. Mandatory tissue submission of hernia sacs should be reconsidered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)717-718
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Inguinal Hernia
Hernia
Pediatrics
Guidelines
Patient Care
Retrospective Studies
Pathology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Wenner, William ; Gutenberg, Marta ; Crombleholme, Timothy ; Flickinger, Cory ; Bartlett, Scott P. / The pathological evaluation of the pediatric inguinal hernia sac. In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 1998 ; Vol. 33, No. 5. pp. 717-718.
@article{d1a985df125c45b5bdc5eeb9f5b89309,
title = "The pathological evaluation of the pediatric inguinal hernia sac",
abstract = "Background: The College of American Pathologists has suggested that institutions should establish guidelines for the evaluation of the hernia sac. In addition, some states require the submission of this tissue for pathological evaluation. Yet, neither evidence-based guidelines nor published reviews for the evaluation of the pediatric hernia sac are available. Therefore, this retrospective study was conducted to document experience with the evaluation of the pediatric hernia sac. Methods: All reports of the evaluation of hernia sacs submitted to the Department of Pathology during an 8-year period were reviewed. The case of any report that differed in any way from 'consistent with hernia sac' was evaluated for the effect of the findings on the clinical course. Results: A total of 7,924 hernia sacs were submitted on 6,034 patients. Microscopic evaluation was performed on 534. A total of 7,567 (95.4{\%}) submitted specimens on 5,743 patients were 'consistent with hernia sac' and demonstrated no other findings. Three hundred fifty- seven specimens contained findings in addition to hernia sac. In no patient did the results of the evaluation have an effect on the patient care. Conclusions: There is strong evidence that the routine pathological evaluation of pediatric hernia sacs offers little relevant clinical information. Mandatory tissue submission of hernia sacs should be reconsidered.",
author = "William Wenner and Marta Gutenberg and Timothy Crombleholme and Cory Flickinger and Bartlett, {Scott P.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90195-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "717--718",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Wenner, W, Gutenberg, M, Crombleholme, T, Flickinger, C & Bartlett, SP 1998, 'The pathological evaluation of the pediatric inguinal hernia sac', Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 717-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90195-6

The pathological evaluation of the pediatric inguinal hernia sac. / Wenner, William; Gutenberg, Marta; Crombleholme, Timothy; Flickinger, Cory; Bartlett, Scott P.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 33, No. 5, 01.01.1998, p. 717-718.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The pathological evaluation of the pediatric inguinal hernia sac

AU - Wenner, William

AU - Gutenberg, Marta

AU - Crombleholme, Timothy

AU - Flickinger, Cory

AU - Bartlett, Scott P.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Background: The College of American Pathologists has suggested that institutions should establish guidelines for the evaluation of the hernia sac. In addition, some states require the submission of this tissue for pathological evaluation. Yet, neither evidence-based guidelines nor published reviews for the evaluation of the pediatric hernia sac are available. Therefore, this retrospective study was conducted to document experience with the evaluation of the pediatric hernia sac. Methods: All reports of the evaluation of hernia sacs submitted to the Department of Pathology during an 8-year period were reviewed. The case of any report that differed in any way from 'consistent with hernia sac' was evaluated for the effect of the findings on the clinical course. Results: A total of 7,924 hernia sacs were submitted on 6,034 patients. Microscopic evaluation was performed on 534. A total of 7,567 (95.4%) submitted specimens on 5,743 patients were 'consistent with hernia sac' and demonstrated no other findings. Three hundred fifty- seven specimens contained findings in addition to hernia sac. In no patient did the results of the evaluation have an effect on the patient care. Conclusions: There is strong evidence that the routine pathological evaluation of pediatric hernia sacs offers little relevant clinical information. Mandatory tissue submission of hernia sacs should be reconsidered.

AB - Background: The College of American Pathologists has suggested that institutions should establish guidelines for the evaluation of the hernia sac. In addition, some states require the submission of this tissue for pathological evaluation. Yet, neither evidence-based guidelines nor published reviews for the evaluation of the pediatric hernia sac are available. Therefore, this retrospective study was conducted to document experience with the evaluation of the pediatric hernia sac. Methods: All reports of the evaluation of hernia sacs submitted to the Department of Pathology during an 8-year period were reviewed. The case of any report that differed in any way from 'consistent with hernia sac' was evaluated for the effect of the findings on the clinical course. Results: A total of 7,924 hernia sacs were submitted on 6,034 patients. Microscopic evaluation was performed on 534. A total of 7,567 (95.4%) submitted specimens on 5,743 patients were 'consistent with hernia sac' and demonstrated no other findings. Three hundred fifty- seven specimens contained findings in addition to hernia sac. In no patient did the results of the evaluation have an effect on the patient care. Conclusions: There is strong evidence that the routine pathological evaluation of pediatric hernia sacs offers little relevant clinical information. Mandatory tissue submission of hernia sacs should be reconsidered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13144261672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13144261672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90195-6

DO - 10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90195-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 9607476

AN - SCOPUS:13144261672

VL - 33

SP - 717

EP - 718

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 5

ER -