The 'pause' in global warming in historical context: (II). Comparing models to observations

Stephan Lewandowsky, Kevin Cowtan, James S. Risbey, Michael E. Mann, Byron A. Steinman, Naomi Oreskes, Stefan Rahmstorf

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We review the evidence for a putative early 21st-century divergence between global mean surface temperature (GMST) and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections. We provide a systematic comparison between temperatures and projections using historical versions of GMST products and historical versions of model projections that existed at the times when claims about a divergence were made. The comparisons are conducted with a variety of statistical techniques that correct for problems in previous work, including using continuous trends and a Monte Carlo approach to simulate internal variability. The results show that there is no robust statistical evidence for a divergence between models and observations. The impression of a divergence early in the 21st century was caused by various biases in model interpretation and in the observations, and was unsupported by robust statistics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number123007
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume13
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Global Warming
Global warming
global warming
divergence
Temperature
twenty first century
surface temperature
Statistics
temperature
comparison

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Lewandowsky, S., Cowtan, K., Risbey, J. S., Mann, M. E., Steinman, B. A., Oreskes, N., & Rahmstorf, S. (2018). The 'pause' in global warming in historical context: (II). Comparing models to observations. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), [123007]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf372
Lewandowsky, Stephan ; Cowtan, Kevin ; Risbey, James S. ; Mann, Michael E. ; Steinman, Byron A. ; Oreskes, Naomi ; Rahmstorf, Stefan. / The 'pause' in global warming in historical context : (II). Comparing models to observations. In: Environmental Research Letters. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 12.
@article{fea0c4c19d7f4beb915141f6e92fe3a3,
title = "The 'pause' in global warming in historical context: (II). Comparing models to observations",
abstract = "We review the evidence for a putative early 21st-century divergence between global mean surface temperature (GMST) and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections. We provide a systematic comparison between temperatures and projections using historical versions of GMST products and historical versions of model projections that existed at the times when claims about a divergence were made. The comparisons are conducted with a variety of statistical techniques that correct for problems in previous work, including using continuous trends and a Monte Carlo approach to simulate internal variability. The results show that there is no robust statistical evidence for a divergence between models and observations. The impression of a divergence early in the 21st century was caused by various biases in model interpretation and in the observations, and was unsupported by robust statistics.",
author = "Stephan Lewandowsky and Kevin Cowtan and Risbey, {James S.} and Mann, {Michael E.} and Steinman, {Byron A.} and Naomi Oreskes and Stefan Rahmstorf",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1088/1748-9326/aaf372",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Environmental Research Letters",
issn = "1748-9326",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

Lewandowsky, S, Cowtan, K, Risbey, JS, Mann, ME, Steinman, BA, Oreskes, N & Rahmstorf, S 2018, 'The 'pause' in global warming in historical context: (II). Comparing models to observations', Environmental Research Letters, vol. 13, no. 12, 123007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf372

The 'pause' in global warming in historical context : (II). Comparing models to observations. / Lewandowsky, Stephan; Cowtan, Kevin; Risbey, James S.; Mann, Michael E.; Steinman, Byron A.; Oreskes, Naomi; Rahmstorf, Stefan.

In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, No. 12, 123007, 12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 'pause' in global warming in historical context

T2 - (II). Comparing models to observations

AU - Lewandowsky, Stephan

AU - Cowtan, Kevin

AU - Risbey, James S.

AU - Mann, Michael E.

AU - Steinman, Byron A.

AU - Oreskes, Naomi

AU - Rahmstorf, Stefan

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - We review the evidence for a putative early 21st-century divergence between global mean surface temperature (GMST) and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections. We provide a systematic comparison between temperatures and projections using historical versions of GMST products and historical versions of model projections that existed at the times when claims about a divergence were made. The comparisons are conducted with a variety of statistical techniques that correct for problems in previous work, including using continuous trends and a Monte Carlo approach to simulate internal variability. The results show that there is no robust statistical evidence for a divergence between models and observations. The impression of a divergence early in the 21st century was caused by various biases in model interpretation and in the observations, and was unsupported by robust statistics.

AB - We review the evidence for a putative early 21st-century divergence between global mean surface temperature (GMST) and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections. We provide a systematic comparison between temperatures and projections using historical versions of GMST products and historical versions of model projections that existed at the times when claims about a divergence were made. The comparisons are conducted with a variety of statistical techniques that correct for problems in previous work, including using continuous trends and a Monte Carlo approach to simulate internal variability. The results show that there is no robust statistical evidence for a divergence between models and observations. The impression of a divergence early in the 21st century was caused by various biases in model interpretation and in the observations, and was unsupported by robust statistics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060124018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060124018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf372

DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf372

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85060124018

VL - 13

JO - Environmental Research Letters

JF - Environmental Research Letters

SN - 1748-9326

IS - 12

M1 - 123007

ER -