The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk

Karen Gasper, Gerald L. Clore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

140 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three experiments investigated how trait anxiety would influence individuals' assumptions about the relevance of their experiences of state anxiety for judgments of risk. Experiment 1 found that attributions of state anxiety to a judgment-irrelevant source reduced the risk estimates of low, but not of high, trait-anxious individuals. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that attribution manipulations reduce the influence of state affect on judgment only when the state affect is inconsistent with participants' trait affect. Experiment 3 revealed that these effects can be controlled by explicitly manipulating participants' assumptions about the relevance of their feelings. Regardless of the level of trait anxiety, attributions were effective at reducing mood effects when facts, but not feelings, were assumed to be the relevant basis for judgment. Overall, the results suggest that trait-consistent affect is more readily assumed to be informative and hence is more likely to be relied on than trait-inconsistent affect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1350-1363
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume74
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Anxiety
anxiety
attribution
experiment
Emotions
mood
manipulation
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{281132ff67bd489c986d130f75cb634a,
title = "The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk",
abstract = "Three experiments investigated how trait anxiety would influence individuals' assumptions about the relevance of their experiences of state anxiety for judgments of risk. Experiment 1 found that attributions of state anxiety to a judgment-irrelevant source reduced the risk estimates of low, but not of high, trait-anxious individuals. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that attribution manipulations reduce the influence of state affect on judgment only when the state affect is inconsistent with participants' trait affect. Experiment 3 revealed that these effects can be controlled by explicitly manipulating participants' assumptions about the relevance of their feelings. Regardless of the level of trait anxiety, attributions were effective at reducing mood effects when facts, but not feelings, were assumed to be the relevant basis for judgment. Overall, the results suggest that trait-consistent affect is more readily assumed to be informative and hence is more likely to be relied on than trait-inconsistent affect.",
author = "Karen Gasper and Clore, {Gerald L.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1350",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "1350--1363",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk. / Gasper, Karen; Clore, Gerald L.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 5, 01.01.1998, p. 1350-1363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk

AU - Gasper, Karen

AU - Clore, Gerald L.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Three experiments investigated how trait anxiety would influence individuals' assumptions about the relevance of their experiences of state anxiety for judgments of risk. Experiment 1 found that attributions of state anxiety to a judgment-irrelevant source reduced the risk estimates of low, but not of high, trait-anxious individuals. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that attribution manipulations reduce the influence of state affect on judgment only when the state affect is inconsistent with participants' trait affect. Experiment 3 revealed that these effects can be controlled by explicitly manipulating participants' assumptions about the relevance of their feelings. Regardless of the level of trait anxiety, attributions were effective at reducing mood effects when facts, but not feelings, were assumed to be the relevant basis for judgment. Overall, the results suggest that trait-consistent affect is more readily assumed to be informative and hence is more likely to be relied on than trait-inconsistent affect.

AB - Three experiments investigated how trait anxiety would influence individuals' assumptions about the relevance of their experiences of state anxiety for judgments of risk. Experiment 1 found that attributions of state anxiety to a judgment-irrelevant source reduced the risk estimates of low, but not of high, trait-anxious individuals. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that attribution manipulations reduce the influence of state affect on judgment only when the state affect is inconsistent with participants' trait affect. Experiment 3 revealed that these effects can be controlled by explicitly manipulating participants' assumptions about the relevance of their feelings. Regardless of the level of trait anxiety, attributions were effective at reducing mood effects when facts, but not feelings, were assumed to be the relevant basis for judgment. Overall, the results suggest that trait-consistent affect is more readily assumed to be informative and hence is more likely to be relied on than trait-inconsistent affect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032067667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032067667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1350

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1350

M3 - Article

C2 - 9599448

AN - SCOPUS:0032067667

VL - 74

SP - 1350

EP - 1363

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -