The perspectives of health care providers and staff on the usefulness of a diabetes registry

Heather Stuckey, Frederick Yoo, William Curry, Robert A. Gabbay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

• Objective: To obtain the perspectives of health care providers and staff on the usefulness of a chronic disease registry. • Methods: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design with a survey sent to all health care providers and staff registry users throughout the Penn State system followed by 10 interviews and 4 focus groups to follow up on survey responses. Descriptive statistics and correlations were run for the survey data. Provider and staff survey responses were compared using a Wilcoxon test. A thematic analysis was performed on transcripts of the interviews and focus groups. • Results: Providers and staff were generally satisfied with the registry and felt that it increased the efficiency of the diabetes patient visit. Themes identified in the interviews and focus groups included (1) quality improvements, (2) efficiency, (3) research applicability, and (4) implementation challenges. • Conclusion: The use of a chronic disease registry can be advantageous in clinical care and can help with adherence to evidence-based guidelines, quality improvement, efficiency, clinical organization of health care delivery, and academic research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-33
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Volume18
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

Health Personnel
Registries
Focus Groups
Interviews
Quality Improvement
Chronic Disease
Research
Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{09664ed995b24370aa0515fcd007108f,
title = "The perspectives of health care providers and staff on the usefulness of a diabetes registry",
abstract = "• Objective: To obtain the perspectives of health care providers and staff on the usefulness of a chronic disease registry. • Methods: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design with a survey sent to all health care providers and staff registry users throughout the Penn State system followed by 10 interviews and 4 focus groups to follow up on survey responses. Descriptive statistics and correlations were run for the survey data. Provider and staff survey responses were compared using a Wilcoxon test. A thematic analysis was performed on transcripts of the interviews and focus groups. • Results: Providers and staff were generally satisfied with the registry and felt that it increased the efficiency of the diabetes patient visit. Themes identified in the interviews and focus groups included (1) quality improvements, (2) efficiency, (3) research applicability, and (4) implementation challenges. • Conclusion: The use of a chronic disease registry can be advantageous in clinical care and can help with adherence to evidence-based guidelines, quality improvement, efficiency, clinical organization of health care delivery, and academic research.",
author = "Heather Stuckey and Frederick Yoo and William Curry and Gabbay, {Robert A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "22--33",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management",
issn = "1079-6533",
publisher = "Turner White Communications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

The perspectives of health care providers and staff on the usefulness of a diabetes registry. / Stuckey, Heather; Yoo, Frederick; Curry, William; Gabbay, Robert A.

In: Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management, Vol. 18, No. 7, 01.07.2011, p. 22-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The perspectives of health care providers and staff on the usefulness of a diabetes registry

AU - Stuckey, Heather

AU - Yoo, Frederick

AU - Curry, William

AU - Gabbay, Robert A.

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - • Objective: To obtain the perspectives of health care providers and staff on the usefulness of a chronic disease registry. • Methods: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design with a survey sent to all health care providers and staff registry users throughout the Penn State system followed by 10 interviews and 4 focus groups to follow up on survey responses. Descriptive statistics and correlations were run for the survey data. Provider and staff survey responses were compared using a Wilcoxon test. A thematic analysis was performed on transcripts of the interviews and focus groups. • Results: Providers and staff were generally satisfied with the registry and felt that it increased the efficiency of the diabetes patient visit. Themes identified in the interviews and focus groups included (1) quality improvements, (2) efficiency, (3) research applicability, and (4) implementation challenges. • Conclusion: The use of a chronic disease registry can be advantageous in clinical care and can help with adherence to evidence-based guidelines, quality improvement, efficiency, clinical organization of health care delivery, and academic research.

AB - • Objective: To obtain the perspectives of health care providers and staff on the usefulness of a chronic disease registry. • Methods: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design with a survey sent to all health care providers and staff registry users throughout the Penn State system followed by 10 interviews and 4 focus groups to follow up on survey responses. Descriptive statistics and correlations were run for the survey data. Provider and staff survey responses were compared using a Wilcoxon test. A thematic analysis was performed on transcripts of the interviews and focus groups. • Results: Providers and staff were generally satisfied with the registry and felt that it increased the efficiency of the diabetes patient visit. Themes identified in the interviews and focus groups included (1) quality improvements, (2) efficiency, (3) research applicability, and (4) implementation challenges. • Conclusion: The use of a chronic disease registry can be advantageous in clinical care and can help with adherence to evidence-based guidelines, quality improvement, efficiency, clinical organization of health care delivery, and academic research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960734159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960734159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960734159

VL - 18

SP - 22

EP - 33

JO - Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management

JF - Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management

SN - 1079-6533

IS - 7

ER -