The persuasiveness of synthetic speech versus human speech

Steven E. Stern, John W. Mullennix, Corrie Lynn Dyson, Stephen Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Is computer-synthesized speech as persuasive as the human voice when presenting an argument? After completing an attitude pretest, 193 participants were randomly assigned to listen to a persuasive appeal under three conditions: a high-quality synthesized speech system (DECtalk Express), a low-quality synthesized speech system (Monologue), and a tape recording of a human voice. Following the appeal, participants completed a posttest attitude survey and a series of questionnaires designed to assess perceptions of speech qualities, perceptions of the speaker, and perceptions of the message. The human voice was generally perceived more favorably than the computer-synthesized voice, and the speaker was perceived more favorably when the voice was a human voice than when it was computer synthesized. There was, however, no evidence that computerized speech, as compared with the human voice, affected persuasion or perceptions of the message. Actual or potential applications of this research include issues that should be considered when designing synthetic speech systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)588-595
Number of pages8
JournalHuman Factors
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

appeal
sound storage medium
Tape Recording
Persuasive Communication
Speech Perception
persuasion
Tape recordings
questionnaire
evidence
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Stern, Steven E. ; Mullennix, John W. ; Dyson, Corrie Lynn ; Wilson, Stephen. / The persuasiveness of synthetic speech versus human speech. In: Human Factors. 1999 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 588-595.
@article{09968dcc5b944aeab6170c985a29d26f,
title = "The persuasiveness of synthetic speech versus human speech",
abstract = "Is computer-synthesized speech as persuasive as the human voice when presenting an argument? After completing an attitude pretest, 193 participants were randomly assigned to listen to a persuasive appeal under three conditions: a high-quality synthesized speech system (DECtalk Express), a low-quality synthesized speech system (Monologue), and a tape recording of a human voice. Following the appeal, participants completed a posttest attitude survey and a series of questionnaires designed to assess perceptions of speech qualities, perceptions of the speaker, and perceptions of the message. The human voice was generally perceived more favorably than the computer-synthesized voice, and the speaker was perceived more favorably when the voice was a human voice than when it was computer synthesized. There was, however, no evidence that computerized speech, as compared with the human voice, affected persuasion or perceptions of the message. Actual or potential applications of this research include issues that should be considered when designing synthetic speech systems.",
author = "Stern, {Steven E.} and Mullennix, {John W.} and Dyson, {Corrie Lynn} and Stephen Wilson",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1518/001872099779656680",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "588--595",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

The persuasiveness of synthetic speech versus human speech. / Stern, Steven E.; Mullennix, John W.; Dyson, Corrie Lynn; Wilson, Stephen.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.01.1999, p. 588-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The persuasiveness of synthetic speech versus human speech

AU - Stern, Steven E.

AU - Mullennix, John W.

AU - Dyson, Corrie Lynn

AU - Wilson, Stephen

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Is computer-synthesized speech as persuasive as the human voice when presenting an argument? After completing an attitude pretest, 193 participants were randomly assigned to listen to a persuasive appeal under three conditions: a high-quality synthesized speech system (DECtalk Express), a low-quality synthesized speech system (Monologue), and a tape recording of a human voice. Following the appeal, participants completed a posttest attitude survey and a series of questionnaires designed to assess perceptions of speech qualities, perceptions of the speaker, and perceptions of the message. The human voice was generally perceived more favorably than the computer-synthesized voice, and the speaker was perceived more favorably when the voice was a human voice than when it was computer synthesized. There was, however, no evidence that computerized speech, as compared with the human voice, affected persuasion or perceptions of the message. Actual or potential applications of this research include issues that should be considered when designing synthetic speech systems.

AB - Is computer-synthesized speech as persuasive as the human voice when presenting an argument? After completing an attitude pretest, 193 participants were randomly assigned to listen to a persuasive appeal under three conditions: a high-quality synthesized speech system (DECtalk Express), a low-quality synthesized speech system (Monologue), and a tape recording of a human voice. Following the appeal, participants completed a posttest attitude survey and a series of questionnaires designed to assess perceptions of speech qualities, perceptions of the speaker, and perceptions of the message. The human voice was generally perceived more favorably than the computer-synthesized voice, and the speaker was perceived more favorably when the voice was a human voice than when it was computer synthesized. There was, however, no evidence that computerized speech, as compared with the human voice, affected persuasion or perceptions of the message. Actual or potential applications of this research include issues that should be considered when designing synthetic speech systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033505120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033505120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1518/001872099779656680

DO - 10.1518/001872099779656680

M3 - Article

C2 - 10774129

AN - SCOPUS:0033505120

VL - 41

SP - 588

EP - 595

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 4

ER -