The Physiology of Argumentative Skill Deficiency: Cognitive Ability, Emotional Competence, Communication Qualities, and Responses to Conflict

Lindsey Susan Aloia, Denise Haunani Solomon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study drew upon the argumentative skill deficiency model to advance hypotheses linking cognitive ability and emotional competence to the prominence of loudness, criticism, disagreement, and sarcasm in conflict interactions between dating partners. Hypotheses also predicted that these communication qualities amplify physiological stress responses to conflict interactions, as indexed by measures of salivary cortisol. One hundred college-aged students (50 romantic couples) participated in a dyadic interaction in which they discussed a source of conflict in their relationship. Structural equation analyses evaluated an actor–partner interdependence model in which personal qualities predicted communication qualities that, in turn, predicted amplitude of cortisol change. Results indicated partial support for our hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-338
Number of pages24
JournalCommunication Monographs
Volume82
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2015

Fingerprint

Cortisol
Physiology
physiology
cognitive ability
communication
Communication
interaction
Students
interdependence
criticism
Cognitive Ability
Emotion
Communication Competence
student
Interaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

@article{a7884b1dd05d4c79a92330ae482cf8ea,
title = "The Physiology of Argumentative Skill Deficiency: Cognitive Ability, Emotional Competence, Communication Qualities, and Responses to Conflict",
abstract = "This study drew upon the argumentative skill deficiency model to advance hypotheses linking cognitive ability and emotional competence to the prominence of loudness, criticism, disagreement, and sarcasm in conflict interactions between dating partners. Hypotheses also predicted that these communication qualities amplify physiological stress responses to conflict interactions, as indexed by measures of salivary cortisol. One hundred college-aged students (50 romantic couples) participated in a dyadic interaction in which they discussed a source of conflict in their relationship. Structural equation analyses evaluated an actor–partner interdependence model in which personal qualities predicted communication qualities that, in turn, predicted amplitude of cortisol change. Results indicated partial support for our hypotheses.",
author = "Aloia, {Lindsey Susan} and Solomon, {Denise Haunani}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/03637751.2014.989868",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "315--338",
journal = "Communication Monographs",
issn = "0363-7751",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Physiology of Argumentative Skill Deficiency

T2 - Cognitive Ability, Emotional Competence, Communication Qualities, and Responses to Conflict

AU - Aloia, Lindsey Susan

AU - Solomon, Denise Haunani

PY - 2015/7/3

Y1 - 2015/7/3

N2 - This study drew upon the argumentative skill deficiency model to advance hypotheses linking cognitive ability and emotional competence to the prominence of loudness, criticism, disagreement, and sarcasm in conflict interactions between dating partners. Hypotheses also predicted that these communication qualities amplify physiological stress responses to conflict interactions, as indexed by measures of salivary cortisol. One hundred college-aged students (50 romantic couples) participated in a dyadic interaction in which they discussed a source of conflict in their relationship. Structural equation analyses evaluated an actor–partner interdependence model in which personal qualities predicted communication qualities that, in turn, predicted amplitude of cortisol change. Results indicated partial support for our hypotheses.

AB - This study drew upon the argumentative skill deficiency model to advance hypotheses linking cognitive ability and emotional competence to the prominence of loudness, criticism, disagreement, and sarcasm in conflict interactions between dating partners. Hypotheses also predicted that these communication qualities amplify physiological stress responses to conflict interactions, as indexed by measures of salivary cortisol. One hundred college-aged students (50 romantic couples) participated in a dyadic interaction in which they discussed a source of conflict in their relationship. Structural equation analyses evaluated an actor–partner interdependence model in which personal qualities predicted communication qualities that, in turn, predicted amplitude of cortisol change. Results indicated partial support for our hypotheses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938420750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938420750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03637751.2014.989868

DO - 10.1080/03637751.2014.989868

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938420750

VL - 82

SP - 315

EP - 338

JO - Communication Monographs

JF - Communication Monographs

SN - 0363-7751

IS - 3

ER -