The politics of imaginaries and bioenergy sub-niches in the emerging Northeast U.S. bioenergy economy

Morey Burnham, Weston Eaton, Theresa Selfa, Cynthia Clare Hinrichs, Andrea Feldpausch-Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As part of a transition to lower carbon energy systems, bioenergy development is often assumed to follow a uniform pathway. Yet the design, organization, and politics of bioenergy production in specific regional contexts may be contested. This study examines contestation within an emerging perennial crop bioenergy sector in the U.S. Northeast. Synthesizing conceptual contributions from the multi-level perspective on the significance of niches and sub-niches in sustainability transitions and from science and technology studies on the material and moral implications of sociotechnical imaginaries and object conflicts, this paper analyzes the politics of bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries. It identifies two main bioenergy sub-niches centered on (1) regional production and (2) community energy. Examining proposed and current production of perennial energy crops on marginal land, the study draws on 42 semi-structured interviews with bioenergy actors (e.g., scientists, industry representatives, policymakers, farmers/landowners) and secondary documents. The two bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries revealed political contestations around scale of operations, control and beneficiaries, and about definitions and uses of marginal land relative to livelihoods and community. This study highlights the potency of rival imaginaries within a developing sociotechnical niche and implications for sustainability transitions. Tracing the contours and emphases of, as well as conflicts between, bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries can clarify which pathways for transition to a lower carbon energy future could garner political and public support. The paper concludes by considering how disagreements between sub-niche actors could lead to productive mutual learning and the possibility of forging solutions contributing to more robust and equitable sustainability transitions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-76
Number of pages11
JournalGeoforum
Volume82
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

bioenergy
economy
politics
energy
sustainability
technology studies
political support
science studies
public support
livelihood
community
farmer
organization
industry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{334233a2d7d44855a64a6834636915f0,
title = "The politics of imaginaries and bioenergy sub-niches in the emerging Northeast U.S. bioenergy economy",
abstract = "As part of a transition to lower carbon energy systems, bioenergy development is often assumed to follow a uniform pathway. Yet the design, organization, and politics of bioenergy production in specific regional contexts may be contested. This study examines contestation within an emerging perennial crop bioenergy sector in the U.S. Northeast. Synthesizing conceptual contributions from the multi-level perspective on the significance of niches and sub-niches in sustainability transitions and from science and technology studies on the material and moral implications of sociotechnical imaginaries and object conflicts, this paper analyzes the politics of bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries. It identifies two main bioenergy sub-niches centered on (1) regional production and (2) community energy. Examining proposed and current production of perennial energy crops on marginal land, the study draws on 42 semi-structured interviews with bioenergy actors (e.g., scientists, industry representatives, policymakers, farmers/landowners) and secondary documents. The two bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries revealed political contestations around scale of operations, control and beneficiaries, and about definitions and uses of marginal land relative to livelihoods and community. This study highlights the potency of rival imaginaries within a developing sociotechnical niche and implications for sustainability transitions. Tracing the contours and emphases of, as well as conflicts between, bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries can clarify which pathways for transition to a lower carbon energy future could garner political and public support. The paper concludes by considering how disagreements between sub-niche actors could lead to productive mutual learning and the possibility of forging solutions contributing to more robust and equitable sustainability transitions.",
author = "Morey Burnham and Weston Eaton and Theresa Selfa and Hinrichs, {Cynthia Clare} and Andrea Feldpausch-Parker",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "66--76",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

The politics of imaginaries and bioenergy sub-niches in the emerging Northeast U.S. bioenergy economy. / Burnham, Morey; Eaton, Weston; Selfa, Theresa; Hinrichs, Cynthia Clare; Feldpausch-Parker, Andrea.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 82, 01.06.2017, p. 66-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The politics of imaginaries and bioenergy sub-niches in the emerging Northeast U.S. bioenergy economy

AU - Burnham, Morey

AU - Eaton, Weston

AU - Selfa, Theresa

AU - Hinrichs, Cynthia Clare

AU - Feldpausch-Parker, Andrea

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - As part of a transition to lower carbon energy systems, bioenergy development is often assumed to follow a uniform pathway. Yet the design, organization, and politics of bioenergy production in specific regional contexts may be contested. This study examines contestation within an emerging perennial crop bioenergy sector in the U.S. Northeast. Synthesizing conceptual contributions from the multi-level perspective on the significance of niches and sub-niches in sustainability transitions and from science and technology studies on the material and moral implications of sociotechnical imaginaries and object conflicts, this paper analyzes the politics of bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries. It identifies two main bioenergy sub-niches centered on (1) regional production and (2) community energy. Examining proposed and current production of perennial energy crops on marginal land, the study draws on 42 semi-structured interviews with bioenergy actors (e.g., scientists, industry representatives, policymakers, farmers/landowners) and secondary documents. The two bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries revealed political contestations around scale of operations, control and beneficiaries, and about definitions and uses of marginal land relative to livelihoods and community. This study highlights the potency of rival imaginaries within a developing sociotechnical niche and implications for sustainability transitions. Tracing the contours and emphases of, as well as conflicts between, bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries can clarify which pathways for transition to a lower carbon energy future could garner political and public support. The paper concludes by considering how disagreements between sub-niche actors could lead to productive mutual learning and the possibility of forging solutions contributing to more robust and equitable sustainability transitions.

AB - As part of a transition to lower carbon energy systems, bioenergy development is often assumed to follow a uniform pathway. Yet the design, organization, and politics of bioenergy production in specific regional contexts may be contested. This study examines contestation within an emerging perennial crop bioenergy sector in the U.S. Northeast. Synthesizing conceptual contributions from the multi-level perspective on the significance of niches and sub-niches in sustainability transitions and from science and technology studies on the material and moral implications of sociotechnical imaginaries and object conflicts, this paper analyzes the politics of bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries. It identifies two main bioenergy sub-niches centered on (1) regional production and (2) community energy. Examining proposed and current production of perennial energy crops on marginal land, the study draws on 42 semi-structured interviews with bioenergy actors (e.g., scientists, industry representatives, policymakers, farmers/landowners) and secondary documents. The two bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries revealed political contestations around scale of operations, control and beneficiaries, and about definitions and uses of marginal land relative to livelihoods and community. This study highlights the potency of rival imaginaries within a developing sociotechnical niche and implications for sustainability transitions. Tracing the contours and emphases of, as well as conflicts between, bioenergy sub-niche imaginaries can clarify which pathways for transition to a lower carbon energy future could garner political and public support. The paper concludes by considering how disagreements between sub-niche actors could lead to productive mutual learning and the possibility of forging solutions contributing to more robust and equitable sustainability transitions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016959839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016959839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.022

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.022

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016959839

VL - 82

SP - 66

EP - 76

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -