The pragmatic significance of “lost causes”: Reflections on Josiah Royce in light of William James and Edward Said

Vincent M. Colapietro, Josiah Royce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

While James suggested the pragmatic meaning of the Absolute is that the Absolute provides a warrant for taking, now and then, a “moral holiday,” Royce envisioned it to be a justification for fighting in behalf of “lost causes.” The battle of the Absolute as waged between these two thinkers was, in no small measure, one bearing upon the human significance and value of the Absolute, especially in reference to experience, time, and history. In the first part of this paper, the author examines Royce’s understanding of lost causes in its original polemical context, whereas in the second part he recontextualizes Royce’s position by juxtaposing it to that of the contemporary theorist Edward Said. Royce’s position needs to be understood in its original context but also invites being considered in a more contemporary one.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-299
Number of pages23
JournalTransactions of the Charles S Peirce Society
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Edward Said
Josiah Royce
Causes
William James
History
Theorists
Warrants
Holidays
Justification
Thinkers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{f02f66cad62144ec8f228c6b316596c1,
title = "The pragmatic significance of “lost causes”: Reflections on Josiah Royce in light of William James and Edward Said",
abstract = "While James suggested the pragmatic meaning of the Absolute is that the Absolute provides a warrant for taking, now and then, a “moral holiday,” Royce envisioned it to be a justification for fighting in behalf of “lost causes.” The battle of the Absolute as waged between these two thinkers was, in no small measure, one bearing upon the human significance and value of the Absolute, especially in reference to experience, time, and history. In the first part of this paper, the author examines Royce’s understanding of lost causes in its original polemical context, whereas in the second part he recontextualizes Royce’s position by juxtaposing it to that of the contemporary theorist Edward Said. Royce’s position needs to be understood in its original context but also invites being considered in a more contemporary one.",
author = "Colapietro, {Vincent M.} and Josiah Royce",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.51.3.277",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "277--299",
journal = "Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society",
issn = "0009-1774",
publisher = "Indiana University Press",
number = "3",

}

The pragmatic significance of “lost causes” : Reflections on Josiah Royce in light of William James and Edward Said. / Colapietro, Vincent M.; Royce, Josiah.

In: Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society, Vol. 51, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 277-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The pragmatic significance of “lost causes”

T2 - Reflections on Josiah Royce in light of William James and Edward Said

AU - Colapietro, Vincent M.

AU - Royce, Josiah

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - While James suggested the pragmatic meaning of the Absolute is that the Absolute provides a warrant for taking, now and then, a “moral holiday,” Royce envisioned it to be a justification for fighting in behalf of “lost causes.” The battle of the Absolute as waged between these two thinkers was, in no small measure, one bearing upon the human significance and value of the Absolute, especially in reference to experience, time, and history. In the first part of this paper, the author examines Royce’s understanding of lost causes in its original polemical context, whereas in the second part he recontextualizes Royce’s position by juxtaposing it to that of the contemporary theorist Edward Said. Royce’s position needs to be understood in its original context but also invites being considered in a more contemporary one.

AB - While James suggested the pragmatic meaning of the Absolute is that the Absolute provides a warrant for taking, now and then, a “moral holiday,” Royce envisioned it to be a justification for fighting in behalf of “lost causes.” The battle of the Absolute as waged between these two thinkers was, in no small measure, one bearing upon the human significance and value of the Absolute, especially in reference to experience, time, and history. In the first part of this paper, the author examines Royce’s understanding of lost causes in its original polemical context, whereas in the second part he recontextualizes Royce’s position by juxtaposing it to that of the contemporary theorist Edward Said. Royce’s position needs to be understood in its original context but also invites being considered in a more contemporary one.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956941253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956941253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.51.3.277

DO - 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.51.3.277

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84956941253

VL - 51

SP - 277

EP - 299

JO - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society

JF - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society

SN - 0009-1774

IS - 3

ER -