État de la connaissance scientifique et mobilisation du principe de précaution

Translated title of the contribution: The precautionary principle and the characterization of scientific uncertainty

Claude Henry, Marc Albert Henry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The precautionary principle is formulated in many different ways. However the differences are not of a fundamental nature. What is fundamental in the principle - i.e. the recognition that decisions must be taken on the basis of uncertain (also called ambiguous) information, in particular uncertain scientific information - is also common to all formulations. But what is exactly meant by uncertain scientific information, and what makes it an acceptable basis for decision ? any non-falsified hypothesis might not be deemed acceptable in this sense. We try to identify what makes an uncertain piece of scientific information acceptable in a decision-making process, drawing from those processes that have dealt with asbestos utilisations, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, antibiotics used as growth factors, and climate change. We consider how to insert this approach in a theory of choice under uncertainty generalizing von Neumman-Morgenstern axiomatics. Classification JEL : D 81 et H 43.

Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)1277-1290
Number of pages14
JournalRevue Economique
Volume54
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

Fingerprint

Scientific uncertainty
Precautionary principle
Antibiotics
Classification JEL
Decision-making process
Growth factors
Choice under uncertainty
Axiomatics
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy
Climate change

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

@article{d0dbfc36d36847949690917cb41e0ca4,
title = "{\'E}tat de la connaissance scientifique et mobilisation du principe de pr{\'e}caution",
abstract = "The precautionary principle is formulated in many different ways. However the differences are not of a fundamental nature. What is fundamental in the principle - i.e. the recognition that decisions must be taken on the basis of uncertain (also called ambiguous) information, in particular uncertain scientific information - is also common to all formulations. But what is exactly meant by uncertain scientific information, and what makes it an acceptable basis for decision ? any non-falsified hypothesis might not be deemed acceptable in this sense. We try to identify what makes an uncertain piece of scientific information acceptable in a decision-making process, drawing from those processes that have dealt with asbestos utilisations, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, antibiotics used as growth factors, and climate change. We consider how to insert this approach in a theory of choice under uncertainty generalizing von Neumman-Morgenstern axiomatics. Classification JEL : D 81 et H 43.",
author = "Claude Henry and Henry, {Marc Albert}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/3503361",
language = "French",
volume = "54",
pages = "1277--1290",
journal = "Revue Economique",
issn = "0035-2764",
publisher = "Presses de Sciences Po",
number = "6",

}

État de la connaissance scientifique et mobilisation du principe de précaution. / Henry, Claude; Henry, Marc Albert.

In: Revue Economique, Vol. 54, No. 6, 01.12.2003, p. 1277-1290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - État de la connaissance scientifique et mobilisation du principe de précaution

AU - Henry, Claude

AU - Henry, Marc Albert

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - The precautionary principle is formulated in many different ways. However the differences are not of a fundamental nature. What is fundamental in the principle - i.e. the recognition that decisions must be taken on the basis of uncertain (also called ambiguous) information, in particular uncertain scientific information - is also common to all formulations. But what is exactly meant by uncertain scientific information, and what makes it an acceptable basis for decision ? any non-falsified hypothesis might not be deemed acceptable in this sense. We try to identify what makes an uncertain piece of scientific information acceptable in a decision-making process, drawing from those processes that have dealt with asbestos utilisations, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, antibiotics used as growth factors, and climate change. We consider how to insert this approach in a theory of choice under uncertainty generalizing von Neumman-Morgenstern axiomatics. Classification JEL : D 81 et H 43.

AB - The precautionary principle is formulated in many different ways. However the differences are not of a fundamental nature. What is fundamental in the principle - i.e. the recognition that decisions must be taken on the basis of uncertain (also called ambiguous) information, in particular uncertain scientific information - is also common to all formulations. But what is exactly meant by uncertain scientific information, and what makes it an acceptable basis for decision ? any non-falsified hypothesis might not be deemed acceptable in this sense. We try to identify what makes an uncertain piece of scientific information acceptable in a decision-making process, drawing from those processes that have dealt with asbestos utilisations, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, antibiotics used as growth factors, and climate change. We consider how to insert this approach in a theory of choice under uncertainty generalizing von Neumman-Morgenstern axiomatics. Classification JEL : D 81 et H 43.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649105975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649105975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/3503361

DO - 10.2307/3503361

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67649105975

VL - 54

SP - 1277

EP - 1290

JO - Revue Economique

JF - Revue Economique

SN - 0035-2764

IS - 6

ER -