The predictive validity of the decision styles scale

An evaluation across task types

Katherine Hamilton, Shin I. Shih, Susan Mohammed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research on decision making has been limited by the lack of consensus on how to effectively conceptualize and measure decision styles. The current study extends previous research by providing validation evidence for the Decision Styles Scale. The psychometric properties and predictive validity of the scale were evaluated across three independent samples and using three different task types (intuitive, rational, and quasi-rational). The results showed that the rational decision style was positively related to decision accuracy, creativity, decision speed, and the reliance on affectively-based information in decision making. Whereas the intuitive decision style was positively related to the reliance on affectively-based information and negatively related to depth of explanations. Both decision styles also interacted to predict decision speed and the reliance on affectively-based information such that, a high intuitive style decreased the positive effect of rational decision style on decision speed and a high rational style increased the positive effect of intuitive decision style on the reliance on affective information. The theoretical implications of these findings along with areas for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-340
Number of pages8
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume119
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Creativity
Research
Psychometrics
Consensus

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{a346594ca6d1487f9c028b3c5fdb9dd1,
title = "The predictive validity of the decision styles scale: An evaluation across task types",
abstract = "Research on decision making has been limited by the lack of consensus on how to effectively conceptualize and measure decision styles. The current study extends previous research by providing validation evidence for the Decision Styles Scale. The psychometric properties and predictive validity of the scale were evaluated across three independent samples and using three different task types (intuitive, rational, and quasi-rational). The results showed that the rational decision style was positively related to decision accuracy, creativity, decision speed, and the reliance on affectively-based information in decision making. Whereas the intuitive decision style was positively related to the reliance on affectively-based information and negatively related to depth of explanations. Both decision styles also interacted to predict decision speed and the reliance on affectively-based information such that, a high intuitive style decreased the positive effect of rational decision style on decision speed and a high rational style increased the positive effect of intuitive decision style on the reliance on affective information. The theoretical implications of these findings along with areas for future research are discussed.",
author = "Katherine Hamilton and Shih, {Shin I.} and Susan Mohammed",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "333--340",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

The predictive validity of the decision styles scale : An evaluation across task types. / Hamilton, Katherine; Shih, Shin I.; Mohammed, Susan.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 119, 01.12.2017, p. 333-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The predictive validity of the decision styles scale

T2 - An evaluation across task types

AU - Hamilton, Katherine

AU - Shih, Shin I.

AU - Mohammed, Susan

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Research on decision making has been limited by the lack of consensus on how to effectively conceptualize and measure decision styles. The current study extends previous research by providing validation evidence for the Decision Styles Scale. The psychometric properties and predictive validity of the scale were evaluated across three independent samples and using three different task types (intuitive, rational, and quasi-rational). The results showed that the rational decision style was positively related to decision accuracy, creativity, decision speed, and the reliance on affectively-based information in decision making. Whereas the intuitive decision style was positively related to the reliance on affectively-based information and negatively related to depth of explanations. Both decision styles also interacted to predict decision speed and the reliance on affectively-based information such that, a high intuitive style decreased the positive effect of rational decision style on decision speed and a high rational style increased the positive effect of intuitive decision style on the reliance on affective information. The theoretical implications of these findings along with areas for future research are discussed.

AB - Research on decision making has been limited by the lack of consensus on how to effectively conceptualize and measure decision styles. The current study extends previous research by providing validation evidence for the Decision Styles Scale. The psychometric properties and predictive validity of the scale were evaluated across three independent samples and using three different task types (intuitive, rational, and quasi-rational). The results showed that the rational decision style was positively related to decision accuracy, creativity, decision speed, and the reliance on affectively-based information in decision making. Whereas the intuitive decision style was positively related to the reliance on affectively-based information and negatively related to depth of explanations. Both decision styles also interacted to predict decision speed and the reliance on affectively-based information such that, a high intuitive style decreased the positive effect of rational decision style on decision speed and a high rational style increased the positive effect of intuitive decision style on the reliance on affective information. The theoretical implications of these findings along with areas for future research are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027297067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027297067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.009

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.009

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 333

EP - 340

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

ER -