The present of the English future

Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse

Rena Torres Cacoullos, James A. Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use the variationist method to elucidate the expression of future time in English, examining multiple grammaticalization in the same domain (will and going to). Usage patterns show that the choice of form is not determined by invariant semantic readings such as proximity, certainty, willingness, or intention. Rather, particular instances of each general construction occupy lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic niches. While putative differences in meaning are largely neutralized in discourse, grammaticalization paths are reflected in particular constructions of different degrees of lexical specificity, which bear different nuances of meaning or tenacious patterns of distribution inherited from once-meaningful associations. We conclude that collocations contribute to the shape of grammatical variation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)321-354
Number of pages34
JournalLanguage
Volume85
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

discourse
present
pragmatics
semantics
Discourse
Grammatical Variation
Grammaticalization
Collocation
time
Willingness
Niche
Intentions
Syntax
Certainty
Proximity
Specificity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{46d7dc77b95343009aca0c4857c0b272,
title = "The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse",
abstract = "We use the variationist method to elucidate the expression of future time in English, examining multiple grammaticalization in the same domain (will and going to). Usage patterns show that the choice of form is not determined by invariant semantic readings such as proximity, certainty, willingness, or intention. Rather, particular instances of each general construction occupy lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic niches. While putative differences in meaning are largely neutralized in discourse, grammaticalization paths are reflected in particular constructions of different degrees of lexical specificity, which bear different nuances of meaning or tenacious patterns of distribution inherited from once-meaningful associations. We conclude that collocations contribute to the shape of grammatical variation.",
author = "{Torres Cacoullos}, Rena and Walker, {James A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/lan.0.0110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "321--354",
journal = "Language",
issn = "0097-8507",
publisher = "Linguistic Society of America",
number = "2",

}

The present of the English future : Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. / Torres Cacoullos, Rena; Walker, James A.

In: Language, Vol. 85, No. 2, 01.06.2009, p. 321-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The present of the English future

T2 - Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse

AU - Torres Cacoullos, Rena

AU - Walker, James A.

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - We use the variationist method to elucidate the expression of future time in English, examining multiple grammaticalization in the same domain (will and going to). Usage patterns show that the choice of form is not determined by invariant semantic readings such as proximity, certainty, willingness, or intention. Rather, particular instances of each general construction occupy lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic niches. While putative differences in meaning are largely neutralized in discourse, grammaticalization paths are reflected in particular constructions of different degrees of lexical specificity, which bear different nuances of meaning or tenacious patterns of distribution inherited from once-meaningful associations. We conclude that collocations contribute to the shape of grammatical variation.

AB - We use the variationist method to elucidate the expression of future time in English, examining multiple grammaticalization in the same domain (will and going to). Usage patterns show that the choice of form is not determined by invariant semantic readings such as proximity, certainty, willingness, or intention. Rather, particular instances of each general construction occupy lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic niches. While putative differences in meaning are largely neutralized in discourse, grammaticalization paths are reflected in particular constructions of different degrees of lexical specificity, which bear different nuances of meaning or tenacious patterns of distribution inherited from once-meaningful associations. We conclude that collocations contribute to the shape of grammatical variation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73649099168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73649099168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/lan.0.0110

DO - 10.1353/lan.0.0110

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 321

EP - 354

JO - Language

JF - Language

SN - 0097-8507

IS - 2

ER -