The processual principle in folk art: Based on a study of wooden chain carving

Simon Josef Bronner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Folk. Art. Craft. By themselves these brief, piquant words can generate argument and confusion over meaning wherever thinkers meet. In combinations like ‘folk art’ and ‘folk craft’ a noticeable din may arise, particularly, many have claimed, if the thinkers include unreserved art historians and folklorists. To be sure, the 1960s and 1970s witnessed several publications defending (or attacking) the honour and virtue of one or the other discipline. As a teacher of material culture, however, I naturally question strictly exclusive disciplinary camps. True, I am a folklorist by training and temperament; but I am also part of an American Studies Program in a Humanities Division, yet my office and research colleagues sit entrenched in the Behavioral Sciences Wing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-67
Number of pages13
JournalFolk Life
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1983

Fingerprint

folk art
behavioral science
study program
honor
historian
art
teacher
Folklorists
Carvings
Thinkers
Folk Art

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Bronner, Simon Josef. / The processual principle in folk art : Based on a study of wooden chain carving. In: Folk Life. 1983 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 55-67.
@article{f14e8791e2cc460f9d2ebaa40f624927,
title = "The processual principle in folk art: Based on a study of wooden chain carving",
abstract = "Folk. Art. Craft. By themselves these brief, piquant words can generate argument and confusion over meaning wherever thinkers meet. In combinations like ‘folk art’ and ‘folk craft’ a noticeable din may arise, particularly, many have claimed, if the thinkers include unreserved art historians and folklorists. To be sure, the 1960s and 1970s witnessed several publications defending (or attacking) the honour and virtue of one or the other discipline. As a teacher of material culture, however, I naturally question strictly exclusive disciplinary camps. True, I am a folklorist by training and temperament; but I am also part of an American Studies Program in a Humanities Division, yet my office and research colleagues sit entrenched in the Behavioral Sciences Wing.",
author = "Bronner, {Simon Josef}",
year = "1983",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1179/043087783798254546",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "55--67",
journal = "Folk Life",
issn = "0430-8778",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "1",

}

The processual principle in folk art : Based on a study of wooden chain carving. / Bronner, Simon Josef.

In: Folk Life, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.1983, p. 55-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The processual principle in folk art

T2 - Based on a study of wooden chain carving

AU - Bronner, Simon Josef

PY - 1983/1/1

Y1 - 1983/1/1

N2 - Folk. Art. Craft. By themselves these brief, piquant words can generate argument and confusion over meaning wherever thinkers meet. In combinations like ‘folk art’ and ‘folk craft’ a noticeable din may arise, particularly, many have claimed, if the thinkers include unreserved art historians and folklorists. To be sure, the 1960s and 1970s witnessed several publications defending (or attacking) the honour and virtue of one or the other discipline. As a teacher of material culture, however, I naturally question strictly exclusive disciplinary camps. True, I am a folklorist by training and temperament; but I am also part of an American Studies Program in a Humanities Division, yet my office and research colleagues sit entrenched in the Behavioral Sciences Wing.

AB - Folk. Art. Craft. By themselves these brief, piquant words can generate argument and confusion over meaning wherever thinkers meet. In combinations like ‘folk art’ and ‘folk craft’ a noticeable din may arise, particularly, many have claimed, if the thinkers include unreserved art historians and folklorists. To be sure, the 1960s and 1970s witnessed several publications defending (or attacking) the honour and virtue of one or the other discipline. As a teacher of material culture, however, I naturally question strictly exclusive disciplinary camps. True, I am a folklorist by training and temperament; but I am also part of an American Studies Program in a Humanities Division, yet my office and research colleagues sit entrenched in the Behavioral Sciences Wing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974999832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974999832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1179/043087783798254546

DO - 10.1179/043087783798254546

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84974999832

VL - 22

SP - 55

EP - 67

JO - Folk Life

JF - Folk Life

SN - 0430-8778

IS - 1

ER -