The proof of the pudding: An essay in honor of Richard S. Robin

Vincent M. Colapietro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The author joins the efforts of Richard S. Robin in "Classical American Pragmatism and Pragmatism's Proof" to bring into sharp focus some of the most salient features of Peirce's elusive proof (but ones rarely, if ever, thematized in discussions of this topic). Robin offers a strongly pragmatic reading of Peirce's endeavor to prove pragmatism, taking advantage of a distinction Peirce draws himself in R 596 ("Reason's Rules"), that between elucidation and proof. He does so by attending carefully to what Peirce is doing in this endeavor (i.e., by considering critically the pragmatics of proof), going so far as to suggest that there is possibly even a performative dimension to the Peircean proof. What is the upshot? The proof of the pudding is in the eating, not in the recipe. Accordingly, a formal proof can only be part of the story; an equally important part is the largely implicit context wherein the deliberative exercise of rational agency, specifically in reference to the practice of inquiry, aims at a greater measure of heuristic self-control. But this carries implications for what form a proof of pragmatism most appropriately takes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)285-309
Number of pages25
JournalTransactions of the Charles S Peirce Society
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

Pragmatism
Salient
Recipes
Elucidation
Heuristics
Self-control
Rational Agency
Exercise

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{3122d78230c04545852fa347257314b7,
title = "The proof of the pudding: An essay in honor of Richard S. Robin",
abstract = "The author joins the efforts of Richard S. Robin in {"}Classical American Pragmatism and Pragmatism's Proof{"} to bring into sharp focus some of the most salient features of Peirce's elusive proof (but ones rarely, if ever, thematized in discussions of this topic). Robin offers a strongly pragmatic reading of Peirce's endeavor to prove pragmatism, taking advantage of a distinction Peirce draws himself in R 596 ({"}Reason's Rules{"}), that between elucidation and proof. He does so by attending carefully to what Peirce is doing in this endeavor (i.e., by considering critically the pragmatics of proof), going so far as to suggest that there is possibly even a performative dimension to the Peircean proof. What is the upshot? The proof of the pudding is in the eating, not in the recipe. Accordingly, a formal proof can only be part of the story; an equally important part is the largely implicit context wherein the deliberative exercise of rational agency, specifically in reference to the practice of inquiry, aims at a greater measure of heuristic self-control. But this carries implications for what form a proof of pragmatism most appropriately takes.",
author = "Colapietro, {Vincent M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.48.3.285",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "285--309",
journal = "Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society",
issn = "0009-1774",
publisher = "Indiana University Press",
number = "3",

}

The proof of the pudding : An essay in honor of Richard S. Robin. / Colapietro, Vincent M.

In: Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society, Vol. 48, No. 3, 01.12.2012, p. 285-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The proof of the pudding

T2 - An essay in honor of Richard S. Robin

AU - Colapietro, Vincent M.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - The author joins the efforts of Richard S. Robin in "Classical American Pragmatism and Pragmatism's Proof" to bring into sharp focus some of the most salient features of Peirce's elusive proof (but ones rarely, if ever, thematized in discussions of this topic). Robin offers a strongly pragmatic reading of Peirce's endeavor to prove pragmatism, taking advantage of a distinction Peirce draws himself in R 596 ("Reason's Rules"), that between elucidation and proof. He does so by attending carefully to what Peirce is doing in this endeavor (i.e., by considering critically the pragmatics of proof), going so far as to suggest that there is possibly even a performative dimension to the Peircean proof. What is the upshot? The proof of the pudding is in the eating, not in the recipe. Accordingly, a formal proof can only be part of the story; an equally important part is the largely implicit context wherein the deliberative exercise of rational agency, specifically in reference to the practice of inquiry, aims at a greater measure of heuristic self-control. But this carries implications for what form a proof of pragmatism most appropriately takes.

AB - The author joins the efforts of Richard S. Robin in "Classical American Pragmatism and Pragmatism's Proof" to bring into sharp focus some of the most salient features of Peirce's elusive proof (but ones rarely, if ever, thematized in discussions of this topic). Robin offers a strongly pragmatic reading of Peirce's endeavor to prove pragmatism, taking advantage of a distinction Peirce draws himself in R 596 ("Reason's Rules"), that between elucidation and proof. He does so by attending carefully to what Peirce is doing in this endeavor (i.e., by considering critically the pragmatics of proof), going so far as to suggest that there is possibly even a performative dimension to the Peircean proof. What is the upshot? The proof of the pudding is in the eating, not in the recipe. Accordingly, a formal proof can only be part of the story; an equally important part is the largely implicit context wherein the deliberative exercise of rational agency, specifically in reference to the practice of inquiry, aims at a greater measure of heuristic self-control. But this carries implications for what form a proof of pragmatism most appropriately takes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873677694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873677694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.48.3.285

DO - 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.48.3.285

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873677694

VL - 48

SP - 285

EP - 309

JO - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society

JF - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society

SN - 0009-1774

IS - 3

ER -