The Prototype for X Framework: Assessing Impact on Self-Reported Prototyping Behavior of Student Designers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A significant gap exists between engineering students' perceptions of prototypes and prototyping abilities and professionals' perceptions and abilities. Structured prototyping frameworks have recently been developed and proposed as a means to help students close this gap, but the effects of these frameworks on students' behavior have not been assessed. The purpose of this work is to investigate if and how a structured prototyping framework affects the self-reported prototyping behaviors of engineering students. Understanding how structured prototyping frameworks affect students can provide educators with a deeper understanding of the way their students adopt and understand design methods. A mixed method study is presented. A 15-item survey and two open-ended questions were distributed to 235 students in a junior-level mechanical engineering design class in order to capture self-reported prototyping behavior. Quantitative results indicate that significant differences in engineering students' prototyping behaviors exist across time and between groups. Results from qualitative analysis indicate that students in the control group focused solely on improving technical quality, while students in both experimental groups focused on a wider range of design qualities. This study is the first to demonstrate that a structured prototyping framework can affect engineering students' self-reported prototyping behaviors during design activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number042001
JournalJournal of Mechanical Design, Transactions Of the ASME
Volume141
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Students
Mechanical engineering

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

@article{54caf97bb1614bfca88d58f3f35e6063,
title = "The Prototype for X Framework: Assessing Impact on Self-Reported Prototyping Behavior of Student Designers",
abstract = "A significant gap exists between engineering students' perceptions of prototypes and prototyping abilities and professionals' perceptions and abilities. Structured prototyping frameworks have recently been developed and proposed as a means to help students close this gap, but the effects of these frameworks on students' behavior have not been assessed. The purpose of this work is to investigate if and how a structured prototyping framework affects the self-reported prototyping behaviors of engineering students. Understanding how structured prototyping frameworks affect students can provide educators with a deeper understanding of the way their students adopt and understand design methods. A mixed method study is presented. A 15-item survey and two open-ended questions were distributed to 235 students in a junior-level mechanical engineering design class in order to capture self-reported prototyping behavior. Quantitative results indicate that significant differences in engineering students' prototyping behaviors exist across time and between groups. Results from qualitative analysis indicate that students in the control group focused solely on improving technical quality, while students in both experimental groups focused on a wider range of design qualities. This study is the first to demonstrate that a structured prototyping framework can affect engineering students' self-reported prototyping behaviors during design activities.",
author = "Jessica Menold and Jablokow, {Kathryn Weed} and Simpson, {Timothy William}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.4041781",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
journal = "Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME",
issn = "1050-0472",
publisher = "ASME",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Prototype for X Framework

T2 - Assessing Impact on Self-Reported Prototyping Behavior of Student Designers

AU - Menold, Jessica

AU - Jablokow, Kathryn Weed

AU - Simpson, Timothy William

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - A significant gap exists between engineering students' perceptions of prototypes and prototyping abilities and professionals' perceptions and abilities. Structured prototyping frameworks have recently been developed and proposed as a means to help students close this gap, but the effects of these frameworks on students' behavior have not been assessed. The purpose of this work is to investigate if and how a structured prototyping framework affects the self-reported prototyping behaviors of engineering students. Understanding how structured prototyping frameworks affect students can provide educators with a deeper understanding of the way their students adopt and understand design methods. A mixed method study is presented. A 15-item survey and two open-ended questions were distributed to 235 students in a junior-level mechanical engineering design class in order to capture self-reported prototyping behavior. Quantitative results indicate that significant differences in engineering students' prototyping behaviors exist across time and between groups. Results from qualitative analysis indicate that students in the control group focused solely on improving technical quality, while students in both experimental groups focused on a wider range of design qualities. This study is the first to demonstrate that a structured prototyping framework can affect engineering students' self-reported prototyping behaviors during design activities.

AB - A significant gap exists between engineering students' perceptions of prototypes and prototyping abilities and professionals' perceptions and abilities. Structured prototyping frameworks have recently been developed and proposed as a means to help students close this gap, but the effects of these frameworks on students' behavior have not been assessed. The purpose of this work is to investigate if and how a structured prototyping framework affects the self-reported prototyping behaviors of engineering students. Understanding how structured prototyping frameworks affect students can provide educators with a deeper understanding of the way their students adopt and understand design methods. A mixed method study is presented. A 15-item survey and two open-ended questions were distributed to 235 students in a junior-level mechanical engineering design class in order to capture self-reported prototyping behavior. Quantitative results indicate that significant differences in engineering students' prototyping behaviors exist across time and between groups. Results from qualitative analysis indicate that students in the control group focused solely on improving technical quality, while students in both experimental groups focused on a wider range of design qualities. This study is the first to demonstrate that a structured prototyping framework can affect engineering students' self-reported prototyping behaviors during design activities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059934236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059934236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.4041781

DO - 10.1115/1.4041781

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059934236

VL - 141

JO - Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME

JF - Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME

SN - 1050-0472

IS - 4

M1 - 042001

ER -