The Prototype for X (PFX) framework: Assessing the impact of PFX on desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Each year, companies spend billions of dollars on product research and design. Studies indicate that anywhere from 40-50% of those resources are wasted on cancelled products or those which yield poor results. The largest sunk cost of product development occurs during the prototyping phase of the design process, yet engineering design research has largely overlooked this pivotal stage in the design process. This study is a portion of a larger project based on a new theoretical framework for prototyping called Prototype for X or PFX. PFX draws from Human-Centered Design (HCD), Design Thinking (DT), and Design for X (DFX) frameworks and methods to enhance the design process and enable designers to prototype more effectively. Among the anticipated impacts of PFX are increases in user satisfaction, technical quality, and manufacturability of end designs. The research described in this paper marks the first step in testing the impact of PFX on final design outcomes. Results from a between-subjects analysis indicate that PFX methods helped increase the desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs. These results imply that teams introduced to PFX methods produced prototypes that outperformed designs from the control teams across user satisfaction, perceived value, and manufacturability metrics. These results improve our understanding of the prototyping process and highlight the potential impact that structured prototyping methods could have on end designs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication28th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
ISBN (Electronic)9780791850190
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
EventASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2016 - Charlotte, United States
Duration: Aug 21 2016Aug 24 2016

Publication series

NameProceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
Volume7

Other

OtherASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2016
CountryUnited States
CityCharlotte
Period8/21/168/24/16

Fingerprint

Viability
Prototype
Prototyping
Design Process
User Satisfaction
Human-centered Design
Framework
Design
Process Design
Product Development
Engineering Design
Product development
Imply
Metric
Testing
Resources
Costs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Menold, J., Simpson, T. W., & Jablokow, K. W. (2016). The Prototype for X (PFX) framework: Assessing the impact of PFX on desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs. In 28th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; Vol. 7). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC201660225
Menold, Jessica ; Simpson, Timothy W. ; Jablokow, Kathryn W. / The Prototype for X (PFX) framework : Assessing the impact of PFX on desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs. 28th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2016. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference).
@inproceedings{66b95b4480f24e08b7d7aaeb3730590b,
title = "The Prototype for X (PFX) framework: Assessing the impact of PFX on desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs",
abstract = "Each year, companies spend billions of dollars on product research and design. Studies indicate that anywhere from 40-50{\%} of those resources are wasted on cancelled products or those which yield poor results. The largest sunk cost of product development occurs during the prototyping phase of the design process, yet engineering design research has largely overlooked this pivotal stage in the design process. This study is a portion of a larger project based on a new theoretical framework for prototyping called Prototype for X or PFX. PFX draws from Human-Centered Design (HCD), Design Thinking (DT), and Design for X (DFX) frameworks and methods to enhance the design process and enable designers to prototype more effectively. Among the anticipated impacts of PFX are increases in user satisfaction, technical quality, and manufacturability of end designs. The research described in this paper marks the first step in testing the impact of PFX on final design outcomes. Results from a between-subjects analysis indicate that PFX methods helped increase the desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs. These results imply that teams introduced to PFX methods produced prototypes that outperformed designs from the control teams across user satisfaction, perceived value, and manufacturability metrics. These results improve our understanding of the prototyping process and highlight the potential impact that structured prototyping methods could have on end designs.",
author = "Jessica Menold and Simpson, {Timothy W.} and Jablokow, {Kathryn W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/DETC201660225",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)",
booktitle = "28th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology",

}

Menold, J, Simpson, TW & Jablokow, KW 2016, The Prototype for X (PFX) framework: Assessing the impact of PFX on desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs. in 28th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, vol. 7, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2016, Charlotte, United States, 8/21/16. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC201660225

The Prototype for X (PFX) framework : Assessing the impact of PFX on desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs. / Menold, Jessica; Simpson, Timothy W.; Jablokow, Kathryn W.

28th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2016. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; Vol. 7).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - The Prototype for X (PFX) framework

T2 - Assessing the impact of PFX on desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs

AU - Menold, Jessica

AU - Simpson, Timothy W.

AU - Jablokow, Kathryn W.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Each year, companies spend billions of dollars on product research and design. Studies indicate that anywhere from 40-50% of those resources are wasted on cancelled products or those which yield poor results. The largest sunk cost of product development occurs during the prototyping phase of the design process, yet engineering design research has largely overlooked this pivotal stage in the design process. This study is a portion of a larger project based on a new theoretical framework for prototyping called Prototype for X or PFX. PFX draws from Human-Centered Design (HCD), Design Thinking (DT), and Design for X (DFX) frameworks and methods to enhance the design process and enable designers to prototype more effectively. Among the anticipated impacts of PFX are increases in user satisfaction, technical quality, and manufacturability of end designs. The research described in this paper marks the first step in testing the impact of PFX on final design outcomes. Results from a between-subjects analysis indicate that PFX methods helped increase the desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs. These results imply that teams introduced to PFX methods produced prototypes that outperformed designs from the control teams across user satisfaction, perceived value, and manufacturability metrics. These results improve our understanding of the prototyping process and highlight the potential impact that structured prototyping methods could have on end designs.

AB - Each year, companies spend billions of dollars on product research and design. Studies indicate that anywhere from 40-50% of those resources are wasted on cancelled products or those which yield poor results. The largest sunk cost of product development occurs during the prototyping phase of the design process, yet engineering design research has largely overlooked this pivotal stage in the design process. This study is a portion of a larger project based on a new theoretical framework for prototyping called Prototype for X or PFX. PFX draws from Human-Centered Design (HCD), Design Thinking (DT), and Design for X (DFX) frameworks and methods to enhance the design process and enable designers to prototype more effectively. Among the anticipated impacts of PFX are increases in user satisfaction, technical quality, and manufacturability of end designs. The research described in this paper marks the first step in testing the impact of PFX on final design outcomes. Results from a between-subjects analysis indicate that PFX methods helped increase the desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs. These results imply that teams introduced to PFX methods produced prototypes that outperformed designs from the control teams across user satisfaction, perceived value, and manufacturability metrics. These results improve our understanding of the prototyping process and highlight the potential impact that structured prototyping methods could have on end designs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007278931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007278931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/DETC201660225

DO - 10.1115/DETC201660225

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85007278931

T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

BT - 28th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

ER -

Menold J, Simpson TW, Jablokow KW. The Prototype for X (PFX) framework: Assessing the impact of PFX on desirability, feasibility, and viability of end designs. In 28th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 2016. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC201660225