TY - JOUR
T1 - The Racial Position of European Immigrants 1883–1941
T2 - Evidence from Lynching in the Midwest
AU - Rigby, David
AU - Seguin, Charles
N1 - Funding Information:
Charles Seguin acknowledges the support of a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship while this research was being conducted, and a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant. We thank E. M. Beck and Stewart Tolnay for helpful advice on data collection; Michael Pfeifer for sharing his lynching data; Andy Andrews for his support of the project; Frank Baumgartner, Hana Brown, Brandon Gorman, Atiya Husain, Aliza Luft, Peter Owens, and members of the Race Workshop at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for comments and guidance on earlier drafts.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Southern Sociological Society 2018.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - The racial position of European immigrants in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries vis-à-vis blacks and whites is debated. Some argue that many European immigrant groups were initially considered nonwhite, while others argue that they were almost always considered white, if sometimes still from a distinct intrawhite racial category. Using a new dataset of all lynchings in the American Midwest from 1883 to 1941, we explore differences in collective violence enacted upon three groups: native-born whites, blacks, and European immigrants. We find that European immigrants were lynched in ways, and at rates, much more similar to that of native whites than to those of blacks. Blacks in the Midwest were lynched at roughly 30 times the rate of native-born whites and European immigrants, and were sometimes ritually burned in massive “spectacle lynchings” while native whites and European immigrants were never burned. We find suggestive evidence that European immigrants were perceived to have posed threats to the political order. Our results suggest that, in the American Midwest, despite nativist othering, European immigrants were fully on the white side of the color line, and were protected from collective violence by their white status.
AB - The racial position of European immigrants in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries vis-à-vis blacks and whites is debated. Some argue that many European immigrant groups were initially considered nonwhite, while others argue that they were almost always considered white, if sometimes still from a distinct intrawhite racial category. Using a new dataset of all lynchings in the American Midwest from 1883 to 1941, we explore differences in collective violence enacted upon three groups: native-born whites, blacks, and European immigrants. We find that European immigrants were lynched in ways, and at rates, much more similar to that of native whites than to those of blacks. Blacks in the Midwest were lynched at roughly 30 times the rate of native-born whites and European immigrants, and were sometimes ritually burned in massive “spectacle lynchings” while native whites and European immigrants were never burned. We find suggestive evidence that European immigrants were perceived to have posed threats to the political order. Our results suggest that, in the American Midwest, despite nativist othering, European immigrants were fully on the white side of the color line, and were protected from collective violence by their white status.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048788936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048788936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2329496518780921
DO - 10.1177/2329496518780921
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85048788936
VL - 5
SP - 438
EP - 457
JO - Social Currents
JF - Social Currents
SN - 2329-4965
IS - 5
ER -