The relationship between self-other rating agreement and influence tactics and organizational processes

Yair Berson, John Joseph Sosik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the extent to which subordinates' perceptions of soft (i.e., consultation, ingratiation, inspirational appeals), hard (i.e., legitimating, pressure, exchange), and rational persuasion influence tactics were associated with the self-awareness of 144 Israeli telecommunications managers. Self-awareness was operationalized by categorizing managers as overestimators, underestimators, in-agreement/poor or in agreement/good based on the difference between the manager's and his or her subordinates' rating of the manager's charismatic leadership (Atwater & Yammarino, 1997). Results indicated that underestimators tended to use more rational persuasion than overestimators and in-agreement/poor managers. Overestimators tended to use fewer soft tactics than underestimators and in-agreement/good managers. In-agreement/ good managers tended to use more exchange tactics and outperformed overestimators and in-agreement/poor managers in championing a climate of innovation and quality. The practical implications of these results are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)675-698
Number of pages24
JournalGroup and Organization Management
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

Persuasive Communication
Telecommunications
Climate
Referral and Consultation
Pressure
Influence tactics
Rating
Managers
Organizational processes
Tactics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{931023a310a140f598d80ecd674a0ec8,
title = "The relationship between self-other rating agreement and influence tactics and organizational processes",
abstract = "This study examined the extent to which subordinates' perceptions of soft (i.e., consultation, ingratiation, inspirational appeals), hard (i.e., legitimating, pressure, exchange), and rational persuasion influence tactics were associated with the self-awareness of 144 Israeli telecommunications managers. Self-awareness was operationalized by categorizing managers as overestimators, underestimators, in-agreement/poor or in agreement/good based on the difference between the manager's and his or her subordinates' rating of the manager's charismatic leadership (Atwater & Yammarino, 1997). Results indicated that underestimators tended to use more rational persuasion than overestimators and in-agreement/poor managers. Overestimators tended to use fewer soft tactics than underestimators and in-agreement/good managers. In-agreement/ good managers tended to use more exchange tactics and outperformed overestimators and in-agreement/poor managers in championing a climate of innovation and quality. The practical implications of these results are discussed.",
author = "Yair Berson and Sosik, {John Joseph}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1059601106288068",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "675--698",
journal = "Group and Organization Management",
issn = "1059-6011",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

The relationship between self-other rating agreement and influence tactics and organizational processes. / Berson, Yair; Sosik, John Joseph.

In: Group and Organization Management, Vol. 32, No. 6, 01.12.2007, p. 675-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between self-other rating agreement and influence tactics and organizational processes

AU - Berson, Yair

AU - Sosik, John Joseph

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - This study examined the extent to which subordinates' perceptions of soft (i.e., consultation, ingratiation, inspirational appeals), hard (i.e., legitimating, pressure, exchange), and rational persuasion influence tactics were associated with the self-awareness of 144 Israeli telecommunications managers. Self-awareness was operationalized by categorizing managers as overestimators, underestimators, in-agreement/poor or in agreement/good based on the difference between the manager's and his or her subordinates' rating of the manager's charismatic leadership (Atwater & Yammarino, 1997). Results indicated that underestimators tended to use more rational persuasion than overestimators and in-agreement/poor managers. Overestimators tended to use fewer soft tactics than underestimators and in-agreement/good managers. In-agreement/ good managers tended to use more exchange tactics and outperformed overestimators and in-agreement/poor managers in championing a climate of innovation and quality. The practical implications of these results are discussed.

AB - This study examined the extent to which subordinates' perceptions of soft (i.e., consultation, ingratiation, inspirational appeals), hard (i.e., legitimating, pressure, exchange), and rational persuasion influence tactics were associated with the self-awareness of 144 Israeli telecommunications managers. Self-awareness was operationalized by categorizing managers as overestimators, underestimators, in-agreement/poor or in agreement/good based on the difference between the manager's and his or her subordinates' rating of the manager's charismatic leadership (Atwater & Yammarino, 1997). Results indicated that underestimators tended to use more rational persuasion than overestimators and in-agreement/poor managers. Overestimators tended to use fewer soft tactics than underestimators and in-agreement/good managers. In-agreement/ good managers tended to use more exchange tactics and outperformed overestimators and in-agreement/poor managers in championing a climate of innovation and quality. The practical implications of these results are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35648938222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35648938222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1059601106288068

DO - 10.1177/1059601106288068

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 675

EP - 698

JO - Group and Organization Management

JF - Group and Organization Management

SN - 1059-6011

IS - 6

ER -