The relationship between the content and the form of metaphorical statements

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent research suggests that the quality of a metaphorical topic-vehicle pairing should be the determinant to the choice of a proper grammatical form, nominal metaphor versus simile. Two studies examined the relationship between the quality of the content of a metaphorical statement and its grammatical form. Study 1 showed that the two grammatical forms did not differ in aptness when the quality of topic-vehicle pairs and the conventionality of vehicles, a factor associated with the quality of metaphorical expressions, were controlled. With an online comprehension measure, Study 2 found that high quality metaphorical pairings were easier to process than low quality metaphorical pairings in both the metaphor form and the simile form. For high quality metaphorical pairings, information related to both the topics and the vehicles was highly activated at an early stage of processing. The relations among factors involved in the interpretive process of metaphorical language are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-178
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Psycholinguistic Research
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Metaphor
Language
Research
metaphor
comprehension
determinants
language

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{e31f5eec52564796afaf92794b75a423,
title = "The relationship between the content and the form of metaphorical statements",
abstract = "Recent research suggests that the quality of a metaphorical topic-vehicle pairing should be the determinant to the choice of a proper grammatical form, nominal metaphor versus simile. Two studies examined the relationship between the quality of the content of a metaphorical statement and its grammatical form. Study 1 showed that the two grammatical forms did not differ in aptness when the quality of topic-vehicle pairs and the conventionality of vehicles, a factor associated with the quality of metaphorical expressions, were controlled. With an online comprehension measure, Study 2 found that high quality metaphorical pairings were easier to process than low quality metaphorical pairings in both the metaphor form and the simile form. For high quality metaphorical pairings, information related to both the topics and the vehicles was highly activated at an early stage of processing. The relations among factors involved in the interpretive process of metaphorical language are discussed.",
author = "Xu Xu",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10936-009-9131-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "165--178",
journal = "Journal of Psycholinguistic Research",
issn = "0090-6905",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

The relationship between the content and the form of metaphorical statements. / Xu, Xu.

In: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 39, No. 2, 01.01.2010, p. 165-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between the content and the form of metaphorical statements

AU - Xu, Xu

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Recent research suggests that the quality of a metaphorical topic-vehicle pairing should be the determinant to the choice of a proper grammatical form, nominal metaphor versus simile. Two studies examined the relationship between the quality of the content of a metaphorical statement and its grammatical form. Study 1 showed that the two grammatical forms did not differ in aptness when the quality of topic-vehicle pairs and the conventionality of vehicles, a factor associated with the quality of metaphorical expressions, were controlled. With an online comprehension measure, Study 2 found that high quality metaphorical pairings were easier to process than low quality metaphorical pairings in both the metaphor form and the simile form. For high quality metaphorical pairings, information related to both the topics and the vehicles was highly activated at an early stage of processing. The relations among factors involved in the interpretive process of metaphorical language are discussed.

AB - Recent research suggests that the quality of a metaphorical topic-vehicle pairing should be the determinant to the choice of a proper grammatical form, nominal metaphor versus simile. Two studies examined the relationship between the quality of the content of a metaphorical statement and its grammatical form. Study 1 showed that the two grammatical forms did not differ in aptness when the quality of topic-vehicle pairs and the conventionality of vehicles, a factor associated with the quality of metaphorical expressions, were controlled. With an online comprehension measure, Study 2 found that high quality metaphorical pairings were easier to process than low quality metaphorical pairings in both the metaphor form and the simile form. For high quality metaphorical pairings, information related to both the topics and the vehicles was highly activated at an early stage of processing. The relations among factors involved in the interpretive process of metaphorical language are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952089737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952089737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10936-009-9131-5

DO - 10.1007/s10936-009-9131-5

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 165

EP - 178

JO - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

JF - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

SN - 0090-6905

IS - 2

ER -