The relevance of politically relevant dyads

Douglas William Lemke, William Reed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

116 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Relevant dyads are pairs of contiguous states or pairs of states including at least one major power. They are argued to be the population of dyads at risk of international conflict and are increasingly commonly used as the cases analyzed by conflict researchers. Does reliance on relevant dyads (a nonrandom sample of all dyads) introduce threats to valid inference? The authors argue that relevant dyad usage might introduce related problems of measurement error and selection bias and investigate whether there is evidence of such potential problems existing in actual relevant dyad data sets. Results show evidence for both types of potential problems, but neither problem substantively affects estimates of conflict relationships. Therefore, relevant dyad usage is not especially objectionable due to either of these problems, and retrospective sampling might be an even more profitable course for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-144
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

dyad
international conflict
Dyads
evidence
threat
trend

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{c0cb1e8804a049a2bf071de8e613a689,
title = "The relevance of politically relevant dyads",
abstract = "Relevant dyads are pairs of contiguous states or pairs of states including at least one major power. They are argued to be the population of dyads at risk of international conflict and are increasingly commonly used as the cases analyzed by conflict researchers. Does reliance on relevant dyads (a nonrandom sample of all dyads) introduce threats to valid inference? The authors argue that relevant dyad usage might introduce related problems of measurement error and selection bias and investigate whether there is evidence of such potential problems existing in actual relevant dyad data sets. Results show evidence for both types of potential problems, but neither problem substantively affects estimates of conflict relationships. Therefore, relevant dyad usage is not especially objectionable due to either of these problems, and retrospective sampling might be an even more profitable course for future research.",
author = "Lemke, {Douglas William} and William Reed",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022002701045001006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "126--144",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

The relevance of politically relevant dyads. / Lemke, Douglas William; Reed, William.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 126-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relevance of politically relevant dyads

AU - Lemke, Douglas William

AU - Reed, William

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Relevant dyads are pairs of contiguous states or pairs of states including at least one major power. They are argued to be the population of dyads at risk of international conflict and are increasingly commonly used as the cases analyzed by conflict researchers. Does reliance on relevant dyads (a nonrandom sample of all dyads) introduce threats to valid inference? The authors argue that relevant dyad usage might introduce related problems of measurement error and selection bias and investigate whether there is evidence of such potential problems existing in actual relevant dyad data sets. Results show evidence for both types of potential problems, but neither problem substantively affects estimates of conflict relationships. Therefore, relevant dyad usage is not especially objectionable due to either of these problems, and retrospective sampling might be an even more profitable course for future research.

AB - Relevant dyads are pairs of contiguous states or pairs of states including at least one major power. They are argued to be the population of dyads at risk of international conflict and are increasingly commonly used as the cases analyzed by conflict researchers. Does reliance on relevant dyads (a nonrandom sample of all dyads) introduce threats to valid inference? The authors argue that relevant dyad usage might introduce related problems of measurement error and selection bias and investigate whether there is evidence of such potential problems existing in actual relevant dyad data sets. Results show evidence for both types of potential problems, but neither problem substantively affects estimates of conflict relationships. Therefore, relevant dyad usage is not especially objectionable due to either of these problems, and retrospective sampling might be an even more profitable course for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035242045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035242045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002701045001006

DO - 10.1177/0022002701045001006

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 126

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 1

ER -