The response of catarrhine primates to Pleistocene environmental fluctuations in East Asia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Examination of the patterns of distribution for five catarrhine genera (Gigantopithecus, Pongo, Hylobates, Macaca, and Rhinopithecus) during the Pleistocene and Holecene in China indicates that the geographical ranges of individual genera shifted independently of one another in response to conditions of incrsaing seasonlity. All genera examined saw their distributions shift southward, with the shifting subtropical and tropical zones, during the pleistocene. This occurred earlier in the pleistocene for the larger apes, and later for smaller forms. This apparent paradox is readily explained by the inability of large-bodied apes to satisfy the high metabolic demands of a relatively large brain as well those of an abosolutely larger body, Monkeys were somewhat less affected and their greater relative success is attributed to their abilities to survive in more highly seasonal environment by exploiting a wider variety of Plant foods and to produce offapring more quickly, thanks to shorter gestation times and shorter interbirth intervals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-37
Number of pages9
JournalPrimates
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Pongidae
East Asia
Primates
Pongo
Hylobates
food plants
subtropics
Macaca
monkeys
tropics
pregnancy
brain
China
Rhinopithecus

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

@article{7d94d57856e64083883049ccb372d09e,
title = "The response of catarrhine primates to Pleistocene environmental fluctuations in East Asia",
abstract = "Examination of the patterns of distribution for five catarrhine genera (Gigantopithecus, Pongo, Hylobates, Macaca, and Rhinopithecus) during the Pleistocene and Holecene in China indicates that the geographical ranges of individual genera shifted independently of one another in response to conditions of incrsaing seasonlity. All genera examined saw their distributions shift southward, with the shifting subtropical and tropical zones, during the pleistocene. This occurred earlier in the pleistocene for the larger apes, and later for smaller forms. This apparent paradox is readily explained by the inability of large-bodied apes to satisfy the high metabolic demands of a relatively large brain as well those of an abosolutely larger body, Monkeys were somewhat less affected and their greater relative success is attributed to their abilities to survive in more highly seasonal environment by exploiting a wider variety of Plant foods and to produce offapring more quickly, thanks to shorter gestation times and shorter interbirth intervals.",
author = "Jablonski, {Nina G.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF02557741",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "29--37",
journal = "Primates",
issn = "0032-8332",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "1",

}

The response of catarrhine primates to Pleistocene environmental fluctuations in East Asia. / Jablonski, Nina G.

In: Primates, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.01.1998, p. 29-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The response of catarrhine primates to Pleistocene environmental fluctuations in East Asia

AU - Jablonski, Nina G.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Examination of the patterns of distribution for five catarrhine genera (Gigantopithecus, Pongo, Hylobates, Macaca, and Rhinopithecus) during the Pleistocene and Holecene in China indicates that the geographical ranges of individual genera shifted independently of one another in response to conditions of incrsaing seasonlity. All genera examined saw their distributions shift southward, with the shifting subtropical and tropical zones, during the pleistocene. This occurred earlier in the pleistocene for the larger apes, and later for smaller forms. This apparent paradox is readily explained by the inability of large-bodied apes to satisfy the high metabolic demands of a relatively large brain as well those of an abosolutely larger body, Monkeys were somewhat less affected and their greater relative success is attributed to their abilities to survive in more highly seasonal environment by exploiting a wider variety of Plant foods and to produce offapring more quickly, thanks to shorter gestation times and shorter interbirth intervals.

AB - Examination of the patterns of distribution for five catarrhine genera (Gigantopithecus, Pongo, Hylobates, Macaca, and Rhinopithecus) during the Pleistocene and Holecene in China indicates that the geographical ranges of individual genera shifted independently of one another in response to conditions of incrsaing seasonlity. All genera examined saw their distributions shift southward, with the shifting subtropical and tropical zones, during the pleistocene. This occurred earlier in the pleistocene for the larger apes, and later for smaller forms. This apparent paradox is readily explained by the inability of large-bodied apes to satisfy the high metabolic demands of a relatively large brain as well those of an abosolutely larger body, Monkeys were somewhat less affected and their greater relative success is attributed to their abilities to survive in more highly seasonal environment by exploiting a wider variety of Plant foods and to produce offapring more quickly, thanks to shorter gestation times and shorter interbirth intervals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031748617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031748617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02557741

DO - 10.1007/BF02557741

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031748617

VL - 39

SP - 29

EP - 37

JO - Primates

JF - Primates

SN - 0032-8332

IS - 1

ER -