The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment

Judith F. Kroll, Janet G. Van Hell, Natasha Tokowicz, David W. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

184 Scopus citations

Abstract

Brysbaert and Duyck (this issue) suggest that it is time to abandon the Revised Hierarchical Model (Kroll and Stewart, 1994) in favor of connectionist models such as BIA+ (Dijkstra and Van Heuven, 2002) that more accurately account for the recent evidence on non-selective access in bilingual word recognition. In this brief response, we first review the history of the Revised Hierarchical Model (RHM), consider the set of issues that it was proposed to address and then evaluate the evidence that supports and fails to support the initial claims of the model. Although fifteen years of new research findings require a number of revisions to the RHM, we argue that the central issues to which the model was addressed, the way in which new lexical forms are mapped to meaning and the consequence of language learning history for lexical processing, cannot be accounted for solely within models of word recognition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-381
Number of pages9
JournalBilingualism
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this