The rhetoric of American Indian activism in the 1960s and 1970s

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Political rhetoric in a democracy is, in at least some sense, educative and constitutive even as it is instrumentally persuasive. For members of ethnic, racial, or cultural groups that lie outside of the dominant culture, the educative processes that underlie policy advocacy require attention to specific cultures, traditions, historical experiences, and group interests. Thus, even though all out‐groups share many common challenges, they all face unique situations as well. This essay explores these rhetorical challenges and some of the strategies designed to meet them through an examination of the political rhetoric of American Indian activists from the 1972 Trail of Broken Treaties through the 1973 siege at Wounded Knee, South Dakota. Particular attention is paid to the question of audience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-136
Number of pages17
JournalCommunication Quarterly
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

International cooperation
American Indian
rhetoric
group interest
outgroup
treaty
democracy
examination
experience
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{38d8c3acd8ff4584b29a780d3ab401e8,
title = "The rhetoric of American Indian activism in the 1960s and 1970s",
abstract = "Political rhetoric in a democracy is, in at least some sense, educative and constitutive even as it is instrumentally persuasive. For members of ethnic, racial, or cultural groups that lie outside of the dominant culture, the educative processes that underlie policy advocacy require attention to specific cultures, traditions, historical experiences, and group interests. Thus, even though all out‐groups share many common challenges, they all face unique situations as well. This essay explores these rhetorical challenges and some of the strategies designed to meet them through an examination of the political rhetoric of American Indian activists from the 1972 Trail of Broken Treaties through the 1973 siege at Wounded Knee, South Dakota. Particular attention is paid to the question of audience.",
author = "Sanchez, {John Philip} and Mary Stuckey",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01463370009385586",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "120--136",
journal = "Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0146-3373",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

The rhetoric of American Indian activism in the 1960s and 1970s. / Sanchez, John Philip; Stuckey, Mary.

In: Communication Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.01.2000, p. 120-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rhetoric of American Indian activism in the 1960s and 1970s

AU - Sanchez, John Philip

AU - Stuckey, Mary

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Political rhetoric in a democracy is, in at least some sense, educative and constitutive even as it is instrumentally persuasive. For members of ethnic, racial, or cultural groups that lie outside of the dominant culture, the educative processes that underlie policy advocacy require attention to specific cultures, traditions, historical experiences, and group interests. Thus, even though all out‐groups share many common challenges, they all face unique situations as well. This essay explores these rhetorical challenges and some of the strategies designed to meet them through an examination of the political rhetoric of American Indian activists from the 1972 Trail of Broken Treaties through the 1973 siege at Wounded Knee, South Dakota. Particular attention is paid to the question of audience.

AB - Political rhetoric in a democracy is, in at least some sense, educative and constitutive even as it is instrumentally persuasive. For members of ethnic, racial, or cultural groups that lie outside of the dominant culture, the educative processes that underlie policy advocacy require attention to specific cultures, traditions, historical experiences, and group interests. Thus, even though all out‐groups share many common challenges, they all face unique situations as well. This essay explores these rhetorical challenges and some of the strategies designed to meet them through an examination of the political rhetoric of American Indian activists from the 1972 Trail of Broken Treaties through the 1973 siege at Wounded Knee, South Dakota. Particular attention is paid to the question of audience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547605646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547605646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01463370009385586

DO - 10.1080/01463370009385586

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 120

EP - 136

JO - Communication Quarterly

JF - Communication Quarterly

SN - 0146-3373

IS - 2

ER -