The Rhizome of the Deaf Child

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides an analysis of the binary construction of human communication as it is represented in the debates about pediatric cochlear implantation. While the authors express their concern about interests that promote pathologizing assumptions about deafness and downplay the known challenges and limitations of cochlear implants, their goal in this article is to call attention to the complex and diverse ways deaf children and adults experience their communicative difference. Drawing from disability studies, deaf studies, the work of Deleuze and Guattari, and Charles Garoian’s 2013 The Prosthetic Pedagogy of Art, the authors scrutinize binary conceptualizations of spoken language and sign language, and deaf/Deaf and hearing. In place of binaries, the authors explore human communication in ways that denaturalize boundaries between, across, and within deaf and hearing communities. The authors draw from Garoian to tie Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of “anomaly” to Snoddon and Underwood’s 2013 discussion of “plurilingualism” to argue that communicative competence is always relational, emergent, and constantly shifting and that which is positioned as anomalous is that which simultaneously creates potential for the emergence of new ways of being. The authors invite readers to “enter the rhizome” and “navigate in-between spaces where bodies as multiplicities can thrive.”

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)562-574
Number of pages13
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2015

Fingerprint

disability studies
communicative competence
deafness
communication
spoken language
art
language
community
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anthropology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{97d6cabd375f4d9ca60b3759c97a3095,
title = "The Rhizome of the Deaf Child",
abstract = "This article provides an analysis of the binary construction of human communication as it is represented in the debates about pediatric cochlear implantation. While the authors express their concern about interests that promote pathologizing assumptions about deafness and downplay the known challenges and limitations of cochlear implants, their goal in this article is to call attention to the complex and diverse ways deaf children and adults experience their communicative difference. Drawing from disability studies, deaf studies, the work of Deleuze and Guattari, and Charles Garoian’s 2013 The Prosthetic Pedagogy of Art, the authors scrutinize binary conceptualizations of spoken language and sign language, and deaf/Deaf and hearing. In place of binaries, the authors explore human communication in ways that denaturalize boundaries between, across, and within deaf and hearing communities. The authors draw from Garoian to tie Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of “anomaly” to Snoddon and Underwood’s 2013 discussion of “plurilingualism” to argue that communicative competence is always relational, emergent, and constantly shifting and that which is positioned as anomalous is that which simultaneously creates potential for the emergence of new ways of being. The authors invite readers to “enter the rhizome” and “navigate in-between spaces where bodies as multiplicities can thrive.”",
author = "Valente, {Joseph M.} and Boldt, {Gail Louise}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1177/1077800415581885",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "562--574",
journal = "Qualitative Inquiry",
issn = "1077-8004",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

The Rhizome of the Deaf Child. / Valente, Joseph M.; Boldt, Gail Louise.

In: Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 21, No. 6, 15.07.2015, p. 562-574.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Rhizome of the Deaf Child

AU - Valente, Joseph M.

AU - Boldt, Gail Louise

PY - 2015/7/15

Y1 - 2015/7/15

N2 - This article provides an analysis of the binary construction of human communication as it is represented in the debates about pediatric cochlear implantation. While the authors express their concern about interests that promote pathologizing assumptions about deafness and downplay the known challenges and limitations of cochlear implants, their goal in this article is to call attention to the complex and diverse ways deaf children and adults experience their communicative difference. Drawing from disability studies, deaf studies, the work of Deleuze and Guattari, and Charles Garoian’s 2013 The Prosthetic Pedagogy of Art, the authors scrutinize binary conceptualizations of spoken language and sign language, and deaf/Deaf and hearing. In place of binaries, the authors explore human communication in ways that denaturalize boundaries between, across, and within deaf and hearing communities. The authors draw from Garoian to tie Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of “anomaly” to Snoddon and Underwood’s 2013 discussion of “plurilingualism” to argue that communicative competence is always relational, emergent, and constantly shifting and that which is positioned as anomalous is that which simultaneously creates potential for the emergence of new ways of being. The authors invite readers to “enter the rhizome” and “navigate in-between spaces where bodies as multiplicities can thrive.”

AB - This article provides an analysis of the binary construction of human communication as it is represented in the debates about pediatric cochlear implantation. While the authors express their concern about interests that promote pathologizing assumptions about deafness and downplay the known challenges and limitations of cochlear implants, their goal in this article is to call attention to the complex and diverse ways deaf children and adults experience their communicative difference. Drawing from disability studies, deaf studies, the work of Deleuze and Guattari, and Charles Garoian’s 2013 The Prosthetic Pedagogy of Art, the authors scrutinize binary conceptualizations of spoken language and sign language, and deaf/Deaf and hearing. In place of binaries, the authors explore human communication in ways that denaturalize boundaries between, across, and within deaf and hearing communities. The authors draw from Garoian to tie Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of “anomaly” to Snoddon and Underwood’s 2013 discussion of “plurilingualism” to argue that communicative competence is always relational, emergent, and constantly shifting and that which is positioned as anomalous is that which simultaneously creates potential for the emergence of new ways of being. The authors invite readers to “enter the rhizome” and “navigate in-between spaces where bodies as multiplicities can thrive.”

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930895196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930895196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077800415581885

DO - 10.1177/1077800415581885

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930895196

VL - 21

SP - 562

EP - 574

JO - Qualitative Inquiry

JF - Qualitative Inquiry

SN - 1077-8004

IS - 6

ER -