Abstract
Much of the vast research on corporate control over the past 30 years as well as many of the policy recommendations that have found their way into the securities law over the past 60 years are premised on the separation of ownership from control in public corporations. Thorstein Veblen first raised this issue in 1923 when he wrote of “absentee ownership” (Veblen, 1964). It was also the central concern of Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means in their hugely influential book The Modern Corporation and Private Property written in 1932. They warned that the separation of ownership and control “destroys the very foundation on which the economic order of the past three centuries has rested” and asserted that the “[d]ispersion in the ownership of separate enterprises … has already proceeded far, it is rapidly increasing, and appears to be an inevitable development” (Berle and Means, 1932) of the modern corporate system. More recently, academics such as Michael Jensen and Mark Roe have argued that a wide variety of tax incentives, antitrust policies, regulations, and political pressures, rather than anything inherent in capitalism, has led to the rise of what Roe calls “strong managers and weak owners. Although the premise of the separation of ownership from management plays such a central role, little, if any, evidence has been presented to support the proposition that managerial ownership has declined over time.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Economic Nature of the Firm |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Reader, Third Edition |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 313-326 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780511817410 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780521193948 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2012 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
Cite this
}
The rise in managerial stock ownership. / Holderness, Clifford G.; Kroszner, Randall S.; Sheehan, Dennis P.
The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader, Third Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2012. p. 313-326.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
TY - CHAP
T1 - The rise in managerial stock ownership
AU - Holderness, Clifford G.
AU - Kroszner, Randall S.
AU - Sheehan, Dennis P.
PY - 2012/1/1
Y1 - 2012/1/1
N2 - Much of the vast research on corporate control over the past 30 years as well as many of the policy recommendations that have found their way into the securities law over the past 60 years are premised on the separation of ownership from control in public corporations. Thorstein Veblen first raised this issue in 1923 when he wrote of “absentee ownership” (Veblen, 1964). It was also the central concern of Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means in their hugely influential book The Modern Corporation and Private Property written in 1932. They warned that the separation of ownership and control “destroys the very foundation on which the economic order of the past three centuries has rested” and asserted that the “[d]ispersion in the ownership of separate enterprises … has already proceeded far, it is rapidly increasing, and appears to be an inevitable development” (Berle and Means, 1932) of the modern corporate system. More recently, academics such as Michael Jensen and Mark Roe have argued that a wide variety of tax incentives, antitrust policies, regulations, and political pressures, rather than anything inherent in capitalism, has led to the rise of what Roe calls “strong managers and weak owners. Although the premise of the separation of ownership from management plays such a central role, little, if any, evidence has been presented to support the proposition that managerial ownership has declined over time.
AB - Much of the vast research on corporate control over the past 30 years as well as many of the policy recommendations that have found their way into the securities law over the past 60 years are premised on the separation of ownership from control in public corporations. Thorstein Veblen first raised this issue in 1923 when he wrote of “absentee ownership” (Veblen, 1964). It was also the central concern of Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means in their hugely influential book The Modern Corporation and Private Property written in 1932. They warned that the separation of ownership and control “destroys the very foundation on which the economic order of the past three centuries has rested” and asserted that the “[d]ispersion in the ownership of separate enterprises … has already proceeded far, it is rapidly increasing, and appears to be an inevitable development” (Berle and Means, 1932) of the modern corporate system. More recently, academics such as Michael Jensen and Mark Roe have argued that a wide variety of tax incentives, antitrust policies, regulations, and political pressures, rather than anything inherent in capitalism, has led to the rise of what Roe calls “strong managers and weak owners. Although the premise of the separation of ownership from management plays such a central role, little, if any, evidence has been presented to support the proposition that managerial ownership has declined over time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925664505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925664505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511817410.025
DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511817410.025
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84925664505
SN - 9780521193948
SP - 313
EP - 326
BT - The Economic Nature of the Firm
PB - Cambridge University Press
ER -