The role of assessment and evaluation in IPM implementation

Carol L. Pilcher, Edwin G. Rajotte

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

IPM is, by many accounts, a highly successful program. Some claim that the achievements over the last 40 years have given the program a mark of success. In fact, IPM has been described as “one of the best answers to reducing chemical contamination of the environment and improving the safety of food while maintaining agricultural viability” (Rajotte, 1993, p. 297). Others argue that implementation has been slow and success has been limited. Wearing (1988) stated that IPM has not been successful because some IPM technologies have not been adopted by growers. This limited success has resulted in a weakening of political support and a stagnation of funding for IPM in the USA (Gray, 2001). What defines a successful IPM program? How do we assess the true worth of an IPM program? These questions can be answered by conducting an assessment of IPM programs through program evaluation. However, the starting point of any IPM evaluation is made with three goals in mind; economic, an assessment of the costs and benefits; environmental, impacts on soil, water and non-pest organisms; and social, an assessment of a program's impact on people's health and well-being. A historical review of IPM evaluation, Evaluation has been a component of some pest management programs, starting back in the 1940s. During this time (1940s to 1960s), program evaluations were used to assess the needs of clients and determine the future directions (Allen & Rajotte, 1990).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationIntegrated Pest Management
Subtitle of host publicationConcepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages479-488
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9780511626463
ISBN (Print)9780521875950
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

program evaluation
Program Evaluation
pest management
funding
food safety
growers
Pest Control
environmental impact
Food Safety
pollution
soil water
viability
economics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
organisms
Soil
Economics
Technology
Water
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Pilcher, C. L., & Rajotte, E. G. (2008). The role of assessment and evaluation in IPM implementation. In Integrated Pest Management: Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies (pp. 479-488). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626463.039
Pilcher, Carol L. ; Rajotte, Edwin G. / The role of assessment and evaluation in IPM implementation. Integrated Pest Management: Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies. Cambridge University Press, 2008. pp. 479-488
@inbook{a325de4b2b6943a8863e74e932bd6c23,
title = "The role of assessment and evaluation in IPM implementation",
abstract = "IPM is, by many accounts, a highly successful program. Some claim that the achievements over the last 40 years have given the program a mark of success. In fact, IPM has been described as “one of the best answers to reducing chemical contamination of the environment and improving the safety of food while maintaining agricultural viability” (Rajotte, 1993, p. 297). Others argue that implementation has been slow and success has been limited. Wearing (1988) stated that IPM has not been successful because some IPM technologies have not been adopted by growers. This limited success has resulted in a weakening of political support and a stagnation of funding for IPM in the USA (Gray, 2001). What defines a successful IPM program? How do we assess the true worth of an IPM program? These questions can be answered by conducting an assessment of IPM programs through program evaluation. However, the starting point of any IPM evaluation is made with three goals in mind; economic, an assessment of the costs and benefits; environmental, impacts on soil, water and non-pest organisms; and social, an assessment of a program's impact on people's health and well-being. A historical review of IPM evaluation, Evaluation has been a component of some pest management programs, starting back in the 1940s. During this time (1940s to 1960s), program evaluations were used to assess the needs of clients and determine the future directions (Allen & Rajotte, 1990).",
author = "Pilcher, {Carol L.} and Rajotte, {Edwin G.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511626463.039",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521875950",
pages = "479--488",
booktitle = "Integrated Pest Management",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Pilcher, CL & Rajotte, EG 2008, The role of assessment and evaluation in IPM implementation. in Integrated Pest Management: Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies. Cambridge University Press, pp. 479-488. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626463.039

The role of assessment and evaluation in IPM implementation. / Pilcher, Carol L.; Rajotte, Edwin G.

Integrated Pest Management: Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies. Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 479-488.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The role of assessment and evaluation in IPM implementation

AU - Pilcher, Carol L.

AU - Rajotte, Edwin G.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - IPM is, by many accounts, a highly successful program. Some claim that the achievements over the last 40 years have given the program a mark of success. In fact, IPM has been described as “one of the best answers to reducing chemical contamination of the environment and improving the safety of food while maintaining agricultural viability” (Rajotte, 1993, p. 297). Others argue that implementation has been slow and success has been limited. Wearing (1988) stated that IPM has not been successful because some IPM technologies have not been adopted by growers. This limited success has resulted in a weakening of political support and a stagnation of funding for IPM in the USA (Gray, 2001). What defines a successful IPM program? How do we assess the true worth of an IPM program? These questions can be answered by conducting an assessment of IPM programs through program evaluation. However, the starting point of any IPM evaluation is made with three goals in mind; economic, an assessment of the costs and benefits; environmental, impacts on soil, water and non-pest organisms; and social, an assessment of a program's impact on people's health and well-being. A historical review of IPM evaluation, Evaluation has been a component of some pest management programs, starting back in the 1940s. During this time (1940s to 1960s), program evaluations were used to assess the needs of clients and determine the future directions (Allen & Rajotte, 1990).

AB - IPM is, by many accounts, a highly successful program. Some claim that the achievements over the last 40 years have given the program a mark of success. In fact, IPM has been described as “one of the best answers to reducing chemical contamination of the environment and improving the safety of food while maintaining agricultural viability” (Rajotte, 1993, p. 297). Others argue that implementation has been slow and success has been limited. Wearing (1988) stated that IPM has not been successful because some IPM technologies have not been adopted by growers. This limited success has resulted in a weakening of political support and a stagnation of funding for IPM in the USA (Gray, 2001). What defines a successful IPM program? How do we assess the true worth of an IPM program? These questions can be answered by conducting an assessment of IPM programs through program evaluation. However, the starting point of any IPM evaluation is made with three goals in mind; economic, an assessment of the costs and benefits; environmental, impacts on soil, water and non-pest organisms; and social, an assessment of a program's impact on people's health and well-being. A historical review of IPM evaluation, Evaluation has been a component of some pest management programs, starting back in the 1940s. During this time (1940s to 1960s), program evaluations were used to assess the needs of clients and determine the future directions (Allen & Rajotte, 1990).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927097015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927097015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511626463.039

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511626463.039

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84927097015

SN - 9780521875950

SP - 479

EP - 488

BT - Integrated Pest Management

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Pilcher CL, Rajotte EG. The role of assessment and evaluation in IPM implementation. In Integrated Pest Management: Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies. Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 479-488 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626463.039