The role of intentionality and iconicity in children's developing comprehension and production of cartographic symbols

Lauren J. Myers, Lynn Susan Liben

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The contribution of intentionality understanding to symbolic development was examined. Actors added colored dots to a map, displaying either symbolic or aesthetic intentions. In Study 1, most children (5-6 years) understood actors' intentions, but when asked which graphic would help find hidden objects, most selected the incorrect (aesthetic) one whose dot color matched referent color. On a similar task in Study 2, 5- and 6-year-olds systematically picked incorrectly, 9- and 10-year-olds picked correctly, and 7- and 8-year-olds showed mixed performance. When referent color matched neither symbolic nor aesthetic dot colors, children performed better overall, but only the oldest children universally selected the correct graphic and justified choices with intentionality. Results bear on theory of mind, symbolic understanding, and map understanding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)668-684
Number of pages17
JournalChild Development
Volume79
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Fingerprint

symbol
aesthetics
comprehension
Color
Esthetics
Theory of Mind
performance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{2ab9610ec3e04d44b8fe9d2010726d51,
title = "The role of intentionality and iconicity in children's developing comprehension and production of cartographic symbols",
abstract = "The contribution of intentionality understanding to symbolic development was examined. Actors added colored dots to a map, displaying either symbolic or aesthetic intentions. In Study 1, most children (5-6 years) understood actors' intentions, but when asked which graphic would help find hidden objects, most selected the incorrect (aesthetic) one whose dot color matched referent color. On a similar task in Study 2, 5- and 6-year-olds systematically picked incorrectly, 9- and 10-year-olds picked correctly, and 7- and 8-year-olds showed mixed performance. When referent color matched neither symbolic nor aesthetic dot colors, children performed better overall, but only the oldest children universally selected the correct graphic and justified choices with intentionality. Results bear on theory of mind, symbolic understanding, and map understanding.",
author = "Myers, {Lauren J.} and Liben, {Lynn Susan}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01150.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "668--684",
journal = "Child Development",
issn = "0009-3920",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

The role of intentionality and iconicity in children's developing comprehension and production of cartographic symbols. / Myers, Lauren J.; Liben, Lynn Susan.

In: Child Development, Vol. 79, No. 3, 01.05.2008, p. 668-684.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of intentionality and iconicity in children's developing comprehension and production of cartographic symbols

AU - Myers, Lauren J.

AU - Liben, Lynn Susan

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - The contribution of intentionality understanding to symbolic development was examined. Actors added colored dots to a map, displaying either symbolic or aesthetic intentions. In Study 1, most children (5-6 years) understood actors' intentions, but when asked which graphic would help find hidden objects, most selected the incorrect (aesthetic) one whose dot color matched referent color. On a similar task in Study 2, 5- and 6-year-olds systematically picked incorrectly, 9- and 10-year-olds picked correctly, and 7- and 8-year-olds showed mixed performance. When referent color matched neither symbolic nor aesthetic dot colors, children performed better overall, but only the oldest children universally selected the correct graphic and justified choices with intentionality. Results bear on theory of mind, symbolic understanding, and map understanding.

AB - The contribution of intentionality understanding to symbolic development was examined. Actors added colored dots to a map, displaying either symbolic or aesthetic intentions. In Study 1, most children (5-6 years) understood actors' intentions, but when asked which graphic would help find hidden objects, most selected the incorrect (aesthetic) one whose dot color matched referent color. On a similar task in Study 2, 5- and 6-year-olds systematically picked incorrectly, 9- and 10-year-olds picked correctly, and 7- and 8-year-olds showed mixed performance. When referent color matched neither symbolic nor aesthetic dot colors, children performed better overall, but only the oldest children universally selected the correct graphic and justified choices with intentionality. Results bear on theory of mind, symbolic understanding, and map understanding.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43749104424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43749104424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01150.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01150.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18489420

AN - SCOPUS:43749104424

VL - 79

SP - 668

EP - 684

JO - Child Development

JF - Child Development

SN - 0009-3920

IS - 3

ER -