TY - JOUR
T1 - The roles of caregivers and friends in adolescent daily emotion dynamics
AU - Mak, Hio Wa
AU - Lydon-Staley, David M.
AU - Lunkenheimer, Erika
AU - Lai, Mark H.C.
AU - Fosco, Gregory M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The original FLOW Study was supported by Karl R. and Diane Wendle Fink Early Career Professor for the Study of Families. HWM acknowledges support from the National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH019391) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50 DA039838, T32 DA017629). DML acknowledges support from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (1K01DA047417−01A1) and the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation. ESL acknowledges support from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD097189). GMF acknowledges support from the Hillman Family Foundations. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of any of the funding agencies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Daily emotion dynamics provide valuable information about individuals’ emotion processes as they go about their lives. Emotion dynamics such as emotion levels (mean), emotion variability (degree of fluctuation), and emotion network density (strength of temporal connections among emotions) are associated with risks for various psychopathology in youth and adults. Prior work has shown that caregivers and friends play crucial socializing roles in adolescent emotional well-being, but less is known about their roles in daily emotion dynamics. This study examined whether caregiver emotion coaching, caregiver-adolescent closeness, and friendship quality were associated with adolescents’ emotion levels, emotion variability, and emotion network density. Further, we examined whether caregiver-adolescent closeness moderated the associations between coaching and emotion dynamics. Participants were 150 adolescents (61% girls; Mage = 14.75) and one of their caregivers (95% female; Mage = 43.35) who completed a baseline survey and 21 daily surveys. Results showed that caregiver emotion coaching interacted with caregiver-adolescent closeness in predicting emotion levels and variability. Specifically, when closeness was higher, emotion coaching was significantly associated with lower sadness and anger levels, higher happiness levels, and lower happiness variability. Caregiver emotion coaching, independent of closeness, was also associated with lower anxiety levels, lower sadness variability, and lower emotion network density. Friendship quality was significantly associated with lower levels of sadness, anxiety, and anger, higher levels of happiness, and lower variability in anxiety and anger. These findings suggest that caregivers and friends are central to everyday emotion levels and variability and a more flexible emotion system in adolescents.
AB - Daily emotion dynamics provide valuable information about individuals’ emotion processes as they go about their lives. Emotion dynamics such as emotion levels (mean), emotion variability (degree of fluctuation), and emotion network density (strength of temporal connections among emotions) are associated with risks for various psychopathology in youth and adults. Prior work has shown that caregivers and friends play crucial socializing roles in adolescent emotional well-being, but less is known about their roles in daily emotion dynamics. This study examined whether caregiver emotion coaching, caregiver-adolescent closeness, and friendship quality were associated with adolescents’ emotion levels, emotion variability, and emotion network density. Further, we examined whether caregiver-adolescent closeness moderated the associations between coaching and emotion dynamics. Participants were 150 adolescents (61% girls; Mage = 14.75) and one of their caregivers (95% female; Mage = 43.35) who completed a baseline survey and 21 daily surveys. Results showed that caregiver emotion coaching interacted with caregiver-adolescent closeness in predicting emotion levels and variability. Specifically, when closeness was higher, emotion coaching was significantly associated with lower sadness and anger levels, higher happiness levels, and lower happiness variability. Caregiver emotion coaching, independent of closeness, was also associated with lower anxiety levels, lower sadness variability, and lower emotion network density. Friendship quality was significantly associated with lower levels of sadness, anxiety, and anger, higher levels of happiness, and lower variability in anxiety and anger. These findings suggest that caregivers and friends are central to everyday emotion levels and variability and a more flexible emotion system in adolescents.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137889870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137889870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/sode.12637
DO - 10.1111/sode.12637
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137889870
SN - 0961-205X
VL - 32
SP - 263
EP - 282
JO - Social Development
JF - Social Development
IS - 1
ER -