The sampling and estimation of marine paleodiversity patterns: Implications of a Pliocene model

James W. Valentine, David Jablonski, Andrew Zachary Krug, Sarah K. Berke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data that accurately capture the spatial structure of biodiversity are required for many paleobiological questions, from assessments of changing provinciality and the role of geographic ranges in extinction and originations, to estimates of global taxonomic or morphological diversity through time. Studies of temporal changes in diversity and global biogeographic patterns have attempted to overcome fossil sampling biases through sampling standardization protocols, but such approaches must ultimately be limited by available literature and museum collections. One approach to evaluating such limits is to compare results from the fossil record with models of past diversity patterns informed by modern relationships between diversity and climatic factors. Here we use present-day patterns for marine bivalves, combined with data on the geologic ages and distributions of extant taxa, to develop a model for Pliocene diversity patterns, which is then compared with diversity patterns retrieved from the literature as compiled by the Paleobiology Database (PaleoDB). The published Pliocene bivalve data (PaleoDB) lack the first-order spatial structure required to generate the modern biogeography within the time available (<3 Myr). Instead, the published data (raw and standardized) show global diversity maxima in the Tropical West Atlantic, followed closely by a peak in the cool-temperate East Atlantic. Either today's tropical West Pacific diversity peak, double that of any other tropical region, is a purely Pleistocene phenomenon-highly unlikely given the geologic ages of extant genera and the topology of molecular phylogenies-or the paleontological literature is such a distorted sample of tropical Pliocene diversity that current sampling standardization methods cannot compensate for existing biases. A rigorous understanding of large-scale spatial and temporal diversity patterns will require new approaches that can compensate for such strong bias, presumably by drawing more fully on our understanding of the factors that underlie the deployment of diversity today.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalPaleobiology
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

Pliocene
paleobiology
Bivalvia
sampling
standardization
bivalve
fossils
Databases
sampling bias
Museums
Selection Bias
Biodiversity
Age Distribution
climatic factors
Phylogeny
tropical region
fossil record
biogeography
topology
museum

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Valentine, James W. ; Jablonski, David ; Krug, Andrew Zachary ; Berke, Sarah K. / The sampling and estimation of marine paleodiversity patterns : Implications of a Pliocene model. In: Paleobiology. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 1-20.
@article{4672059bbc794abe92602ac13134b22e,
title = "The sampling and estimation of marine paleodiversity patterns: Implications of a Pliocene model",
abstract = "Data that accurately capture the spatial structure of biodiversity are required for many paleobiological questions, from assessments of changing provinciality and the role of geographic ranges in extinction and originations, to estimates of global taxonomic or morphological diversity through time. Studies of temporal changes in diversity and global biogeographic patterns have attempted to overcome fossil sampling biases through sampling standardization protocols, but such approaches must ultimately be limited by available literature and museum collections. One approach to evaluating such limits is to compare results from the fossil record with models of past diversity patterns informed by modern relationships between diversity and climatic factors. Here we use present-day patterns for marine bivalves, combined with data on the geologic ages and distributions of extant taxa, to develop a model for Pliocene diversity patterns, which is then compared with diversity patterns retrieved from the literature as compiled by the Paleobiology Database (PaleoDB). The published Pliocene bivalve data (PaleoDB) lack the first-order spatial structure required to generate the modern biogeography within the time available (<3 Myr). Instead, the published data (raw and standardized) show global diversity maxima in the Tropical West Atlantic, followed closely by a peak in the cool-temperate East Atlantic. Either today's tropical West Pacific diversity peak, double that of any other tropical region, is a purely Pleistocene phenomenon-highly unlikely given the geologic ages of extant genera and the topology of molecular phylogenies-or the paleontological literature is such a distorted sample of tropical Pliocene diversity that current sampling standardization methods cannot compensate for existing biases. A rigorous understanding of large-scale spatial and temporal diversity patterns will require new approaches that can compensate for such strong bias, presumably by drawing more fully on our understanding of the factors that underlie the deployment of diversity today.",
author = "Valentine, {James W.} and David Jablonski and Krug, {Andrew Zachary} and Berke, {Sarah K.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1666/0094-8373-39.1.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Paleobiology",
issn = "0094-8373",
publisher = "Paleontological Society",
number = "1",

}

The sampling and estimation of marine paleodiversity patterns : Implications of a Pliocene model. / Valentine, James W.; Jablonski, David; Krug, Andrew Zachary; Berke, Sarah K.

In: Paleobiology, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.12.2012, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The sampling and estimation of marine paleodiversity patterns

T2 - Implications of a Pliocene model

AU - Valentine, James W.

AU - Jablonski, David

AU - Krug, Andrew Zachary

AU - Berke, Sarah K.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Data that accurately capture the spatial structure of biodiversity are required for many paleobiological questions, from assessments of changing provinciality and the role of geographic ranges in extinction and originations, to estimates of global taxonomic or morphological diversity through time. Studies of temporal changes in diversity and global biogeographic patterns have attempted to overcome fossil sampling biases through sampling standardization protocols, but such approaches must ultimately be limited by available literature and museum collections. One approach to evaluating such limits is to compare results from the fossil record with models of past diversity patterns informed by modern relationships between diversity and climatic factors. Here we use present-day patterns for marine bivalves, combined with data on the geologic ages and distributions of extant taxa, to develop a model for Pliocene diversity patterns, which is then compared with diversity patterns retrieved from the literature as compiled by the Paleobiology Database (PaleoDB). The published Pliocene bivalve data (PaleoDB) lack the first-order spatial structure required to generate the modern biogeography within the time available (<3 Myr). Instead, the published data (raw and standardized) show global diversity maxima in the Tropical West Atlantic, followed closely by a peak in the cool-temperate East Atlantic. Either today's tropical West Pacific diversity peak, double that of any other tropical region, is a purely Pleistocene phenomenon-highly unlikely given the geologic ages of extant genera and the topology of molecular phylogenies-or the paleontological literature is such a distorted sample of tropical Pliocene diversity that current sampling standardization methods cannot compensate for existing biases. A rigorous understanding of large-scale spatial and temporal diversity patterns will require new approaches that can compensate for such strong bias, presumably by drawing more fully on our understanding of the factors that underlie the deployment of diversity today.

AB - Data that accurately capture the spatial structure of biodiversity are required for many paleobiological questions, from assessments of changing provinciality and the role of geographic ranges in extinction and originations, to estimates of global taxonomic or morphological diversity through time. Studies of temporal changes in diversity and global biogeographic patterns have attempted to overcome fossil sampling biases through sampling standardization protocols, but such approaches must ultimately be limited by available literature and museum collections. One approach to evaluating such limits is to compare results from the fossil record with models of past diversity patterns informed by modern relationships between diversity and climatic factors. Here we use present-day patterns for marine bivalves, combined with data on the geologic ages and distributions of extant taxa, to develop a model for Pliocene diversity patterns, which is then compared with diversity patterns retrieved from the literature as compiled by the Paleobiology Database (PaleoDB). The published Pliocene bivalve data (PaleoDB) lack the first-order spatial structure required to generate the modern biogeography within the time available (<3 Myr). Instead, the published data (raw and standardized) show global diversity maxima in the Tropical West Atlantic, followed closely by a peak in the cool-temperate East Atlantic. Either today's tropical West Pacific diversity peak, double that of any other tropical region, is a purely Pleistocene phenomenon-highly unlikely given the geologic ages of extant genera and the topology of molecular phylogenies-or the paleontological literature is such a distorted sample of tropical Pliocene diversity that current sampling standardization methods cannot compensate for existing biases. A rigorous understanding of large-scale spatial and temporal diversity patterns will require new approaches that can compensate for such strong bias, presumably by drawing more fully on our understanding of the factors that underlie the deployment of diversity today.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872161870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872161870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1666/0094-8373-39.1.1

DO - 10.1666/0094-8373-39.1.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84872161870

VL - 39

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Paleobiology

JF - Paleobiology

SN - 0094-8373

IS - 1

ER -