The scientific openness decision model: "Gaming" the technological and scientific outcomes

Gregory McMillan, Alfredo Mauri, Debra L. Casey

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Open innovation has been examined a great deal in the last few years in the technology management and innovation literature, but its critical aspect - scientific openness - has been debated for centuries. The purpose of this paper is to elucidate the arguments for and against scientific openness. Using concepts from game theory, we develop the Scientific Openness Decision Model linking the strategic decision for openness/secrecy and the resultant business environment. We then empirically test that model using data from 118 companies across 54 industries. Openness, measured by scientific publications, is found to be a strong predictor of both positive technological and scientific outcomes for firms. These findings are examined to determine the relative merits of a strategy of scientific openness versus secrecy, and future research possibilities are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-142
Number of pages11
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume86
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Confidentiality
Game Theory
Innovation
Publications
Industry
Game theory
Technology
Gaming
Openness
Decision model

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{80a930f32d1345b0a5acc30e6716ab04,
title = "The scientific openness decision model: {"}Gaming{"} the technological and scientific outcomes",
abstract = "Open innovation has been examined a great deal in the last few years in the technology management and innovation literature, but its critical aspect - scientific openness - has been debated for centuries. The purpose of this paper is to elucidate the arguments for and against scientific openness. Using concepts from game theory, we develop the Scientific Openness Decision Model linking the strategic decision for openness/secrecy and the resultant business environment. We then empirically test that model using data from 118 companies across 54 industries. Openness, measured by scientific publications, is found to be a strong predictor of both positive technological and scientific outcomes for firms. These findings are examined to determine the relative merits of a strategy of scientific openness versus secrecy, and future research possibilities are discussed.",
author = "Gregory McMillan and Alfredo Mauri and Casey, {Debra L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "132--142",
journal = "Technological Forecasting and Social Change",
issn = "0040-1625",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

The scientific openness decision model : "Gaming" the technological and scientific outcomes. / McMillan, Gregory; Mauri, Alfredo; Casey, Debra L.

In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 86, 01.01.2014, p. 132-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - The scientific openness decision model

T2 - "Gaming" the technological and scientific outcomes

AU - McMillan, Gregory

AU - Mauri, Alfredo

AU - Casey, Debra L.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Open innovation has been examined a great deal in the last few years in the technology management and innovation literature, but its critical aspect - scientific openness - has been debated for centuries. The purpose of this paper is to elucidate the arguments for and against scientific openness. Using concepts from game theory, we develop the Scientific Openness Decision Model linking the strategic decision for openness/secrecy and the resultant business environment. We then empirically test that model using data from 118 companies across 54 industries. Openness, measured by scientific publications, is found to be a strong predictor of both positive technological and scientific outcomes for firms. These findings are examined to determine the relative merits of a strategy of scientific openness versus secrecy, and future research possibilities are discussed.

AB - Open innovation has been examined a great deal in the last few years in the technology management and innovation literature, but its critical aspect - scientific openness - has been debated for centuries. The purpose of this paper is to elucidate the arguments for and against scientific openness. Using concepts from game theory, we develop the Scientific Openness Decision Model linking the strategic decision for openness/secrecy and the resultant business environment. We then empirically test that model using data from 118 companies across 54 industries. Openness, measured by scientific publications, is found to be a strong predictor of both positive technological and scientific outcomes for firms. These findings are examined to determine the relative merits of a strategy of scientific openness versus secrecy, and future research possibilities are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902103459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902103459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.021

DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.021

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84902103459

VL - 86

SP - 132

EP - 142

JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

SN - 0040-1625

ER -